Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1684 - Pashtun Sunnis revolt against Shia Persians

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 1684 - Pashtun Sunnis revolt against Shia Persians

    1684

    The Shia Persian Safavids rule Afghanistan
    With brutality they continue attempts to forcefully convert Pashtuns from Sunni to Shia Islam

    Mirwais Hotaki A pashtun intellectual studies carefully all the military weaknesses of the Persians while he spent time there in their courts

    1708
    • Mirwais began organizing his countrymen for a major uprising,
    • In the same year a large part of the Persian garrison was on an expedition outside the city, his men killed the greater number of them, including Gurgin Khan (a famous persian commander)
    • After Gurgin Khan was killed along with his army, the Hotaki tribe took control of the city and the province.
    • Mirwais and his rebels then defeated a large Persian army of 35,000 sent to regain control over the area. of whom only some 700 escaped

    1713.

    An­other Persian army commanded by Rustam Khán was also defeated by the Pashtuns, who thus secured possession of the whole province of Qandahár and becomes independent
    Pashtuns then dispute within each other and oppose each other’s tribes.


    [Mirwais Hotaki, succeeded by his son Mahmud - future emperor of Persia]
    ----------

    *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

    Originally posted by Karachi
    like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

  • #2
    my family has made a movie about this.
    next time i go to germany i,ll ask for the dvd.

    Comment


    • #3
      Really, id love to see that, i will be pestering you about it.
      ----------

      *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

      Originally posted by Karachi
      like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

      Comment


      • #4
        ^
        im sure there will be a wedding this month so i,ll have to go to germany.
        matter of fact i,ll call him right now.

        Comment


        • #5
          thats quite soon! manana
          ----------

          *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

          Originally posted by Karachi
          like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

          Comment


          • #6
            Manzareh,
            I am enjoying your recent threads on our history - keep it up!

            Here is another good one as well.
            Mahmud Hotaki - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

            I had a question though. It says he made the Kandahar region independent. What about other nearby provinces? I once saw a map as to how not only did he make Kandahar independent of Persian influence, but they in return invaded and ruled the Persians for about a decade.

            In 1720, Mahmud and the Ghilzais defeated the rival ethnic Afghan tribe of the Abdalis. However, Mahmud had designs on the Persian empire itself. He had already launched an expedition against Kerman in 1719 and in 1721 he besieged the city again. Failing in this attempt and in another siege on Yazd, in early 1722, Mahmud turned his attention to the shah's capital Isfahan, after first defeating the Persians at the Battle of Gulnabad. Rather than biding his time within the city and resisting a siege in which the small Afghan army was unlikely to succeed, Soltan Hosein marched out to meet Mahmud's force at Golnabad. Here, on March 8, the Persian royal army was thoroughly routed and fled back to Isfahan in disarray. The shah was urged to escape to the provinces to raise more troops but he decided to remain in the capital which was now encircled by the Afghans. Mahmud's siege of Isfahan lasted from March to October, 1722. Lacking artillery, he was forced to resort to a long blockade in the hope of starving the Persians into submission. Soltan Hosein's command during the siege displayed his customary lack of decisiveness and the loyalty of his provincial governors wavered in the face of such incompetence. Starvation and disease finally forced Isfahan into submission (it is estimated that 80,000 of its inhabitants died during the siege). On October 23, Soltan Hosein abdicated and acknowledged Mahmud as the new shah of Persia.
            Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.

            A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai

            For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."


            The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!

            -Ferishta, 1560–1620

            Comment


            • #7
              i think the original backround of gurgin was not persian but somewhere from the caucasian region
              sadly i dont find any afghan sources about the hotak dynasty or the parsiwan safavids on the internet just sources from westerners or parsiwans
              Last edited by PashtunClanMember; 01-28-2018, 04:11 AM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by PashtunClanMember View Post
                i think the original backround of gurgin was not persian but somewhere from the caucasian region
                Gurgin Khan was a Georgian. He is also known as George XI of Kartli. He was also a Christian, but pretended to convert to Islam to gain influence as a Safavid subject.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Why does KIllzai's troll profile keep trying to dig up old threads?

                  Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


                  Originally posted by ذو الفقار
                  don’t try to be smart.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Sarbani View Post
                    Gurgin Khan was a Georgian. He is also known as George XI of Kartli. He was also a Christian, but pretended to convert to Islam to gain influence as a Safavid subject.
                    sources claim that the afghans under the hotaks had no rifles no canons and defeated a full equipt persian safavid army outnumbered with no real equipment just with bows and spears how is that possible?
                    and this gurgin was famous for defeating rebellions and for ruling over other countrys for the persians but he and his army was defeated by the afghans. maybe the afghans back in the day was other people than the afghans today,maybe they was blessed with something that the afghans today not have, who knows.
                    Last edited by PashtunClanMember; 01-28-2018, 11:32 PM.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X