Pashtun obsession with ARYAN

[KhalsaWarrior]

Roadrunner, since you seem to be the pre-eminent forum authority on 'Aryan' constructs, why dont you do us all lesser beings a favor and share a bit of your knowledge?

For the wise-cracks and demeaning comments about other members knowledge you surprisingly show little maturity when it comes to backing up your statements.

[کیش]

the word indian stems from the indus which stems from the word hindu, an ancient word which persian and greeks called sub-continental people.

with that said, india prior to the british takeover did consist of small kingdoms but they were always identified collectively as one whole; india.

you people are wild conpsiracy enthusiasts. you dont like modern, world-wide accepted recollections of hisotry but like to devise your own outrageous nonsense.

Modern day borders and countries were all practically made by the British. From Africa to East Asia.

[qunduz92]

^ what is your point?

[roadrunner]

Roadrunner, since you seem to be the pre-eminent forum authority on 'Aryan' constructs, why dont you do us all lesser beings a favor and share a bit of your knowledge?

For the wise-cracks and demeaning comments about other members knowledge you surprisingly show little maturity when it comes to backing up your statements.

I have shared some.

I have thought about sharing more knowledge with you. But it's a question of balancing the positives of sharing that knowledge with the negatives of it.

I can only see negatives in sharing it at the moment.

But what I've said so far on Indus, Iran, India, Archemids is I think alright to share.

[کیش]

the word indian stems from the indus which stems from the word hindu, an ancient word which persian and greeks called sub-continental people.

with that said, india prior to the british takeover did consist of small kingdoms but they were always identified collectively as one whole; india.

you people are wild conpsiracy enthusiasts. you dont like modern, world-wide accepted recollections of hisotry but like to devise your own outrageous nonsense.

My point is that, your statement is false. Of course we don't line the "modern world-wide acceptance of history" since every other country has problems with their "accepted border".

Also, your world wide acceptance of history are comprised of what westerners say. I take their words with a grain of iodized sodium.

[qunduz92]

border disputes are then backed up by modern recollections of history as well though.

and salt consists of ionically bonded molecules of sodium and chloride. idiozation has nothing to do with it. lol

see now i can give you a taste of your own medicine.

[KhalsaWarrior]

I have shared some.

I have thought about sharing more knowledge with you. But it's a question of balancing the positives of sharing that knowledge with the negatives of it.

I can only see negatives in sharing it at the moment.

But what I've said so far on Indus, Iran, India, Archemids is I think alright to share.

Whatever I have heard from you, however opposite they be to my knowledge, I would like to know your opinion on the matter in clear terms. Lets make a deal, I will open a separate thread stating my version of the 'Aryan' origin and you could debunk it with your views. Or alternatively, we could do the reverse?