Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pashtunistan Dispute 1898-1989

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pashtunistan Dispute 1898-1989

    Pashtunistan

    Since 1947 question of the legitimacy of the Durand Line and Pashtun nationalism have been major concerns in Pak-Afghan relations. These controversies spoiled the relations between the two countries whenever Afghanistan excited sub-nationalism of Pashtunistan in Pakistan, as it did in 1948, 1949, 1955, 1961, and 1973. Such actions led to sporadic border clashes.

    The words Pashtunistan [55,000 google hits], Pakhtunistan [31,000], Pashtoonistan [11,000], Pakhtoonistan, Pukhtunistan, and Pathanistan are variants of the same word, adopted form the words Pashtun, Pakhtoon, Pukhtun and Pathan. The hard sound is used in the north, whereas the soft one in the south. The word “Pathan” is the Indian variant adopted by the British.

    The Pashtunistan shown on some Afghan maps embraces both territory inhabited by Pathans but also the whole of Balochistan south of Quetta. There is a clear and distinct difference between Baluchis and Pashtuns. The inclusion of Balochistan is strange, since its population consists of Baluchis, Brahuis, Jats, as well as some other peoples, none of who are regarded as Pashtuns.

    In the original state named Afghanistan, dating back to 1747, the Pashtun ethnic group constituted an overwhelming majority. Until the late nineteenth century, Afghanistan was a fragile confederation of Pashtun tribes, and the word "Afghan" was used as a synonym for Pashtun.

    Even while under the Moghul Empire, native Afghan Pashtun tribes were beginning to gain power and exercise influence over increasing areas of the country. In the 18th century, one of these tribal confederations, the Durrani, was granted authority over their homelands around present-day Kandahar. Their leader, Ahmad Shah Durrani, went on to form a Muslim empire in the late 18thcentury that was second in area only to the Turks' Ottoman Empire. After Ahmad Shah's death, the empire was beset by rebellions on the part of local tribal chiefs, causing Ahmad Shah's son Timur tomove the capital from Kandahar to Kabul in 1776. Ahmad Shah's grandson Zaman seized the throne after his father's death in 1793.

    Zaman was interested in reestablishing power in Indian , but the British, who were well established in India by this time, persuaded the Shah of Persia to divert Zaman's attention from Indian by threatening the western side of his empire. The Shah obliged and Zaman hurried back to Afghanistan in 1800 to defend his land. His own brother, who agreed to work with the Shah, defeated him. This kind of struggle for power – tribe against tribe, family against family, brother against brother –characterizes the inter-tribal relationships among the Afghans, and continued as their territory became crucial to the interests of greater powers, most notably the czarist Russians in the north and the British in the south.

    Around 1880, Abdurrahman Khan, a Durrani Pashtun and a fine soldier who had learned military strategy from a British mentor, declared himself Emir of Kabul. During the next 10 years, he engaged in a series of battles with tribal leaders, gaining control over area after area until he controlled almostall of modern Afghanistan. Constrained by the competing dictates of powerful Russian and British empires to his north and south, as well as Persia, Abdurrahman concentrated on establishing a single kingdom. To do so, he had to break the power still held by local tribes. He accomplished this in part by forcing movements of enemy Pashtuns to non-Pashtun areas north of the Hindu Kush, where their descendents still live. Another of his strategies to divide the tribes was to establish provincial governorships withboundaries that did not coincide with tribal boundaries.

    Two areas -- Pashtunistan and Baluchistan -- have long complicated Afghanistan's relations with Pakistan. Controversies involving these areas date back to the establishment of the Durand Line in 1893 dividing Pashtun and Baluch tribes living in Afghanistan from those living in what later became Pakistan. The Durand Line is the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan — an artificial division that the Afghan Government does not recognize. The Durand Line treaty worked by the British was signed in 1893 and was to stay in force for one hundred years. Even if the treaty were ratified by a legal legislative body in Afghanistan, its validity would have been expired in 1993 and there is no record of it ever having been revived.

    The Durand Line generally tried to follow tribal boundaries, e.g., by separating those tribes which go to market to Peshawar, Kohat, Bannu, Tank and Quetta from those with economic links with Khurassan, i.e., those having Kabul, Ghazni, and Kandahar as their market towns. Only in two cases, with the Mohmands and the Waziris, were tribes divided by the new border.

    During the time of the British occupation of Indian , the pashtun nomads [kuchi] were still using the lowlands of Indian as their winter pastures. The increasing presence of a stable government led to a limitation and regulation of the nomad’s movements in the area, which led to a reduction in the number of afghan nomads wintering in Indian . Trade conventions between Afghanistan and British Indian caused an increase in formal trade to the expense of the more ‘informal trade’ carried out by the nomads.

    In 1901 the British created a new administrative area, the North-West Frontier Province, which they detached from the Punjab. This new province was divided into Settled Districts and Tribal Agencies, with the latter ruled by a British political agent who reported directly to Delhi. In 1934 Britain extended self-government to the North-West Frontier Province. By this time, the Indian National Congress (Congress Party), which many Muslims saw as a predominately Hindu organization, had expanded its political activities to include the province.

    In 1921, the Afghans concluded a treaty of friendship with the new Bolshevik regime in the SovietUnion. Afghanistan became one of the first nations to recognize the Soviet government, and a special relationship evolved between the two governments that lasted until December 1979, when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan. Amanullah was open to European influence, and pushed for educational reform and the emancipation of women. These proposals infuriated the Muslim religious leaders, and resulted intribal revolts that led to the seizure of Kabul and Amanullah's abdication in 1929.

    Over the next 40 years, a series of cautious and moderate governments under the Afghan monarchy brought political stability to the country, and allowed it to make substantial strides toward modernization and national unity. Always, however, there was substantial resistance to any attemptsat social change from the conservative religious elements of the society. While the monarchy wasalways Pashtun, it was the non-Pashtun, Dari-speaking Afghans who provided the more liberal, Western-looking influences in the country.

    The idea of Pashtunistan remains strong in Pakistan’s secular Pashtun political party, the Awami National Party (ANP). The ANP is led by Asfandyar Wali Khan, and represents the political descendent of the Khudai Khidmatgar (“Red Shirt”) movement of the legendary Abdul Ghafar Khan, the “Frontier Ghandi.” Abdul Ghafar Khan of the NWFP, fondly called Badshah (King) Khan, organized the Red Shirt Party, also known as the Khudai Khidmatgar Party, which was officially linked to the Indian National Congress Party. Khan filled the stage as the most prominent nationalist Muslim. The Pashtun nationalistic fervor — the "Pashtunistan movement" — was mainly organized by the Khudai Khidmatgars or 'Red Shirts.'

    The Pathan (Pashtoons or Pakhtoons) constitute about sixty percent of the total population of Afghanistan which is about 17.6 million. Their major concentrations are in the provinces along the Durand Line. Both the tribal and settled areas along the Durand Line in Pakistan are also largely populated by Pashtoons. The Kabul rulers tried to make political capital out of this. They asserted affinities with Pashtoons in Pakistan and thereby claimed rights in NWFP up to the Indus river and to the south in Baluchistan upto the Makran Coast including the port of Karachi. In a way they wanted to revive the empire of Ahmad Shah Durrani of the 19th century. That would break the geographical compulsion of the landlocked Afghanistan. For the furtherance of this scheme Kabul government found support from two neighbours of Pakistan, that is, Indian and the Soviet Union.
    Last edited by Manzareh; 01-12-2011, 01:05 PM.
    ----------

    *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

    Originally posted by Karachi
    like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

  • #2
    Are fellow "Iranic" brothers sure did us a favor. Thanks for slowly dilapidating are empire with your fellow Caucasians (British).

    How I wish Afghanistan just merged with Iran.

    Nice article btw.

    Comment


    • #3
      Hmm !!
      yao warokay ghwandi baagh ao pa khwa ye seen rawan!

      Comment


      • #4
        Hold on people the saga continues!

        Pashtunistan - 1946-1947

        When the Indian independence struggle intensified, Afghanistan stepped up efforts to reclaim NWFP, FATA and parts of Balochistan lost to the Sikhs and the British in the 19th century. The fertile NWFP offered a hope to replace the British subsidies for the economic survival of the Afghan state. Afghanistan actively supported Faqir Ipi in FATA and political groups in both NWFP and Balochistan to position itself favorably with the Pushtoons.

        In 1946, when the British government announced its firm resolves to transfer its sovereignty over the sub-continent, the Afghan government advanced territorial claims on the British Indian Empire, demanding the restoration of a large area of the sub-continent on the ground that, with the withdrawal of the British, the 1893 treaty would lapse automatically, thereby claiming that the boundary of Afghanistan in the east was that delimited by Ahmad Shah Durrani’s Empire (1747-73). Kabul laid claim to part of northern areas where the Pashtuns live, and even non-Pashtun area of Balochistan, perhaps reaching as far as even the Arabian Sea.

        Pakistan rejected extra-territorial claims of Kabul as untenable. To begin with the Pathans living in NWFP and Balauchistan frustrated lndo-Afghan machinations when the Indian National Congress in collaboration with some officers of the British Political Service sponsored the idea of "self-determination" for Pakistani Pashtoors in 1946. Likewise in 1947 people of NWFP and Baluchistan in two separate referenda over-whelmingly voted for Pakistan. The Kabul Government and its agents and collaborators however continued to agitate for Pakhtoonistan.

        In 1947, just before it was decided to hold referendum in North West Frontier Province (NWFP) the then Chief Minister of the Province who was heading a Congress Ministry made frantic efforts to have a third option of an independent Pakhtoon State be included in the proposed referendum but Mountbatten refused. Despite the fact that Nehru once admitted to Mountbatten quite candidly that NWFP could not possibly stand by itself, the Congress Committee of the NWFP along with the Red Shirts passed a resolution for the establishment of a Free Pathan State and asked the Central Committee to influence Mountbatten.

        The 'Pashhtoonistan' question was raised by Kabul with His Majesty's Government of India

        (HMG) in June 1947. That was on the eve of British departure from South Asia and the creation of the independent states of India and Pakistan. However, the Afghan govenment was not reconciled. They would not accept the validity of the Durand Line, drawn in 1893, on the grounds that Amir Abdur Rahman had acquiesced to it under duress. But the fact remained that the line was owned and recognized by the successors of Amir Abdur Rahman, as inter-state boundary between Afghanistan and British India. In 1919, Amir Amanullah revalidated the Durand Line in the famous Treaty of Rawalpindi. The position of the Durand Line was once again confirmed in the Afghan-British Treaty of 1921. In 1930, King Nadir Shah confirmed the existing Durand Line to the British Government.

        In June 1947, when the provinces and princely states were to chose between India and Pakistan, the Indian National Congress sought to detach the NWFP from Pakistan. First came the demand by the Indian National Congress Working Committee that the voters’ choice in NWFP be widened to include independence, and idea rejected by Lord Mountbatten. Afghanistan sent a note to Delhi and London on July 3, 1947 demanding that people of the NWFP and Balochistan in areas west of the River Indus (a land inhabited by Afghans) should be given the right to decide whether their future should lie with India, Afghanistan, or be independent. In July 1947, the British held a referendum in the Settled Districts of the province offering the population the choice of either joining an independent India or a now-inevitable Pakistan. An estimated 56 percent of the eligible voters participated and over 90 percent elected to join Pakistan. A loya jirgah was held in the Tribal Agencies. Offered a choice between joining India or Pakistan, the tribes declared their preference for the latter.
        ----------

        *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

        Originally posted by Karachi
        like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

        Comment


        • #5
          Pashtunistan - 1947-1955


          Afghanistan vigorously protested the inclusion of Pashtun and Baluch areas within Pakistan without providing the inhabitants with an opportunity for self-determination. The Durrani monarchy went to the extent of opposing Pakistan’s admission to the United Nations and raised irredentist claims to the Pashto speaking areas of NWFP and Balochistan provinces of Pakistan. A ‘Pakhtunistan’ flag was raised in Kabul, alongside the Afghan national flag, as early as September 2, 1947.

          The partitioning and the creation of Pakistan caused a lot of the nomad’s business partners to flee to India, which further damaged the nomad’s trade. The regulation of movement across the border became even more tight under the Pakistani government. Since 1947, this problem has led to incidents along the border, with extensive disruption of normal trade patterns.

          Although both Afghanistan and Pakistan made conciliatory gestures, the matter remained unresolved. In one of the government's attempts to suppress tribal uprisings in 1949, a Pakistani Air Force plane bombed a village just across the frontier. In response, the Afghan government called a loya jirgah, which promptly declared that it recognized "neither the imaginary Durand nor any similar line" and that all agreements -- from the 1893 Durand agreement onward -- pertaining to the issue were void.

          In Kabul on July 26, 1949, the Afghan Government convened a hand-picked Loya Jirga. It included the members of National Assembly. The Afghan parliament made a proclamation against Pakistan, and in favor of the Pashtuns’ right of self-determination. In disregard to the established global norms and international laws, it passed a resolution, rejecting, unilaterally, all treaties, conventions, and agreements concluded between the Afghan government and the British India government. The Jirga passed a resolution in support of Pchtoonistan and declared the 1893 Durand Agreement, the Anglo-Afghan Pact of 1905, the Independence Treaty of Rawalpindi of 1919, the Anglo-Afghan Treaty of 1921 and other treaties and agreements in regard to international border between Afghanistan and Pakistan (based on Durand Line) and in regard to the status of the Pashtoons (Pathans) as null and void, having no legal implication. In addition, to reaffirm this abrogation, Pashtunistan Day was declared to be officially celebrated every year on August 31.
          On 12 August 1949, a group of Afridi tribesmen was called in a meeting in Tirah tribal territory to establish a Pakhtoon Assembly. Another isolated meeting at Razmak in Waziristan, elected the Faqir of Ipi, as "President of Pashtoonistan". He had earlier served as Chairman of the "Provisional Assembly of Independent Pashtoonistan". It was known that the Faqir Ipi had been in league with the Red Shirts or the Khudai Khidmatgars of Abdul Ghaffar Khan.

          The issue of an international boundary through Pashtun areas was of great importance to policymakers in Kabul. Pakistan halted vital transshipments of petroleum to Afghanistan for about three months in 1950, presumably in retaliation for Afghan tribal attacks across the border. At this time, Afghan government interest shifted to offers of aid from the Soviet Union and in July 1950 it signed a major agreement with the Soviet Union.

          Afghanistan became more active as it moved two armored divisions and its air force along the Afghan-Pakistan border, presumably with a hope that it might give moral support to certain tribal interests on the Pakistan side of the Durand Line. The Afghan campaign reached its climax when, in 1950, Afghan King Zahir Shah made an anti-Pakistan speech at a celebration in Kabul. The Afghanistan flag was hoisted, as anti-Pakistan leaflets were dropped by the Afghan air force into tribal areas. Ultimately, on January 9, 1950, Liaquat Ali Khan, the Prime Minister of Pakistan, condemned Afghanistan for its hostilities in the parliament.

          In the summer of 1950, armed clashes occured between Afghanistan and Pakistan in the neighborhood of Gwazha, north of Quetta. On September 30, 1950, a more serious incident took place when a large Afghan force (commanded by a brigadier and supported by artillery and machine guns,) invaded Pakistan in Dobandi area, about 30 miles north east of Chaman. In the initial thrust they cleared a border security post of section strength comprising twelve persons and occupied the Bogra Pass(about four miles inside the Pakistan territory.) Their objective, it seemed, was to cut off the strategic Chaman-Quetta railway line passing through the Khojak Pass. On October 5, they were driven out by Pakistan Army which was supported by Pakistan Air Force. On October 7, Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan said in the Parliament that "having utterly failed to suborn the loyalty of our tribesmen, they have started organizing raids into our territory by Afghan tribesmen and elements of the Afghan Army".

          During 1950 and 1951, Afghan nationals continued raiding of and on across the border into Pakistan along the Durand Line. Irregular forces led by a local Pashtun leader crossed the border in 1950 and 1951 to back Afghan claims.

          Pakistan Government dealt with these raids effectively. Pakistan's government refused to accept the Afghan assertion that it had no control over these men, and both nations' ambassadors were withdrawn, but were exchanged again a few months later. It also lodged protests with the Government of Afghanistan. Pakistan in a counter-move took some measures with regard to Afghan transit trade which passed through the port of Karachi. The pressure thus began telling on the land-locked Afghanistan. About that time a "Radio Free Afghanistan" also started broadcasting programs to dissidents in Afghanistan. This new tit-for-tat policy paid dividends and forays from across the Durand Line were reduced in frequency. Meanwhile, most foreign countries assumed a neutral and dis-interested posture to Pak-Afghan differences. This also held true for the USA which was fast replacing Britain in the Middle East and South Asia.

          In 1955 Pakistan decided to amalgamate the NWFP into the newly formed province of West Pakistan. The Afghan government denounced the merger of West Pakistan’s provinces, Tribal Territories and Princely States. On March 30, 1955, this led to an ugly incident, when Afghan demonstrators attacked and looted the Pakistani embassy in Kabul, and the Pakistan flag was torn down. Mobs ransacked the Pakistani consulates in Jalalabad and Kandahar. After Pakistan's Embassy in Afghanistan was attacked, Pakistan retaliated by strangling Afghan's landlocked economy.

          Normal trade and diplomatic relations were resumed between Afghanistan and Pakistan on September 9, 1955. But a report on November 16, 1955 disseminated by the White House said, “the Afghan government is strongly - even irrationally - committed to its Pashtunistan policy, which seeks as a minimum ‘self determination’ or ‘autonomy’ for the Pashtuns in north-western Pakistan. Although the Afghans officially deny any interest in extending Afghanistan’s borders, the campaign undoubtedly has irredentist overtones.”

          The links between the political leaders of the North-West Frontier Province and the Hindu leaders of Congress were such that a majority in the North-West Frontier Province assembly originally voted to go with India in the partition, a decision which probably would have been rejected by the voting majority in the province.
          President Sardar Muhammad Daud Khan remarked that the “British did a wrong thing many years ago and we have been fighting to rectify it. Until that is done the struggle will continue
          ----------

          *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

          Originally posted by Karachi
          like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

          Comment


          • #6
            Pashtunistan - 1961-1963


            The Pakhtunistan issue, a massive interference in the affairs of Afghanistan’s southeastern neighbour Pakistan, was given state support by King Zahir Shah, Amanullah’s grandson. The ruling family strangled a short era of liberalization in the late 1940s in 1953, when Prince Daud Khan, the king's cousin, became prime minister. He wanted to expand Afghanistan, to include the Pashtun areas and population of Pakistan. Sardar Daud Khan was a strong proponent of Pashtun nationalism and a serious Pakhtunistan activist. But this very issue was to precipitate Daud’s downfall. The Pashtunistan question was pursued with hardline fervor by Prince Mohammad Daud in early 1960's.

            In 1960, the dispute heated up again, when Afghan irregular and Army troops dressed up as tribesmen, penetrating the Pakistan side of the Durand Line in the Bajour area, about 70 miles north of Peshawar. This led to the closing down of Pakistani consulates in Afghanistan in August 1961.

            The most serious crisis lasted from September 1961 to June 1963, when diplomatic, trade, transit, and consular relations between the countries were suspended. The Pashtunistan conflict which erupted in 1961-1963 effectively led to a closure of the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Running out of patience with Afghan agitation, Pakistan closed the border in August 1961. Afghanistan and Pakistan severed relations on September 6, 1961 and traffic between the two countries came to a halt. Afghanistan was thereby obliged to depend more heavily on the Soviet Union for trade and transit facilities.

            The closure of the border with Pakistan over the Pashtunistan conflict in 1960-61 led to a change of the winter pastures from Pakistan to Afghanistan. As a result Afghan nomads were cut off from their winter grazing grounds and were forced to either abandon pastoralism or relocate to winter grazing areas within Afghanistan. During the first year, and then with lesser intensity in 1962, nomads actually fought with each other as they competed for new winter grasslands, and farmers resisted the nomads who established winter quarters near their villages. This led to a reshuffling of pasture user’s rights in these new winter locations, from which ripple effects are still visible today in the provinces bordering Pakistan. Many of the wealthier pashtun nomads [kuchi] abandoned livestock production at this point, and invested in other businesses, which is one of the reasons why many wealthy kuchi are involved in the transportation business nowadays.

            By 1963, it became clear that neither Daoud Khan nor Ayub Khan, then ruler of Pakistan, would yield and to settle the issue one of them would have to be removed from power. Afghanistan's economy was suffering from the dispute and in March 1963, with the backing of the royal family, King Zahir Shah sought Daoud Khan's resignation on the basis that the country'seconomy was deteriorating as a result of his position regarding the Pashtun tribes in Pakistan. Daoud Khan resigned in March 1963 and was succeeded by Dr. Mohammed Yousuf as Prime Minister of Afghanistan. The change improved the atmosphere and diplomatic relations were restored in May 1963. The border was also reopened by Pakistan in May 1963.

            The United States has always supported Pakistan on the issues of the Durand Line and Pashtunistan. According to the U.S. State Department, “The Pashtunistan campaign is as farcical stunt on the part of the Royal Family to promote its own interests.”
            ----------

            *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

            Originally posted by Karachi
            like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

            Comment


            • #7
              Pashtunistan - 1973-1979


              Afghanistan has been an independent nation since August 19, 1919, after the British relinquished control. A monarchy ruled from 1919 until a military coup in 1973. For many years Afghanistan never posed any military threat to Pakistan. During the reign of Afghan King Zahir Shah, Pakistan did not face a threatening military posture from Afghanistan that would require a force deployment on the Durand Line. This was the case even during the two wars with India in 1965 and 1971. Following the overthrow of Zahir Shah in 1973, the new Daud regime raised the issue of Pashtunistan, and for the first time moved the Afghan Army closer to the borders with Pakistan, which resulted in reciprocal Pakistani deployments. A large portion of the Afghan army was deployed along the Durand line. The 1973 coup by Daud in Afghanistan coincided with uprisings in tribal areas in parts of

              Baluchistan and NWFP actively supported by Afghan Intelligence.
              On July 17, 1973 Prince Mohammad Daud, 65-year old first cousin of King Mohammad Zahir (and former strongman Prime Minister of Afghanistan 1953-63) executed a brilliantly organized takeover of the country, supported primarily by a small number of dissident military officers. Daoud’s comeback was a return to traditional strongman rule and he was a particularly appealing figure to military officers. As prime minister, Daoud had obtained large supplies of modern arms from the Soviet Union and he had been a former army officer himself. Also, his strong position on the Pashtunistan issue had not been forgotten by conservative Pashtun officers.

              The main foreign policy question in the region for new regime was what to do about the Pashtunistan question, which Presumably he will adopt strong position against recent divide-and-rule tactics of bhutto in nwfp and baluchistan, but if he learned anything from his expirience of 10 years ago, he will apply this policy more judiciously, perhaps in fashion resembling his predecessors of recent years at least in short term future.

              By November 1973 Pakistan and Afghanistan continued to move slowly and steadily toward confrontation over the Pashtunistan issue. Each of the three players — Kabul, Islamabad, and the Pathan population of Pakistan’s Northwest Frontier Province — was acting under strong domestic compulsions which are largely unrelated to the issue itself but which will continue to fuel rising tensions. Athough the situation is not critical, there were no signs that any side of the triangle is disposed to seek accommodation.

              In Kabul, President Daud was locked in contests of strength with rival elements of his own government and with other centers of Afghan power. Daud, a leading proponent of the thesis that Afghanistan is the political manifestation of the Pashtun people and that Afghanistan therefore has a legitimate interest in Pakistan's Pashtun areas, probably would not push his irredentist policies to confrontation with Pakistan on the basis of his convictions alone. Given his uncertain domestic position, however, the issue may become the only point of agreement between him and his own government and between the government and the Afghan people. Daud already has locked himself into what is tantamount to an ultimatum to Pakistan over its actions in its tribal provinces, and his domestic future may depend on his ability to maintain an aggressive posture.

              Wali Khan, the political leader of Pakistan's Pathans and head of the opposition National Awami Party (NAP), has waged a long and unsuccessful struggle against the expansion of central government authority in Pakistan's tribal provinces. Bhutto's government, through maneuver and coercion, has systematically reduced Wali's power. Wali's statements attested to Pathan frustrations; they also suggested he may have concluded that the invocation of the Pashtunistan issue was his only remaining hope to retain his position and that concern over a possible clash with Afghanistan over this issue may induce Bhutto to make new concessions--notably the restoration of governments in the two tribal provinces to NAP control.

              For his part, Bhutto demonstrated little tolerance for any form of opposition and, mindful of Bangladesh, was especially intolerant of opposition based an ethnic lines. The introduction of the Pashtunistan issue into Pakistan's domestic equation not only confirmed his suspicions of Pathan secessionism but also provided him the pretext to take repressive measures against his political opposition. In order to nip the issue in the bud both at home and in Kabul, Bhutto felt that he must consistently react forcefully in response to NAP or Afghan statements on Pathan rights.

              The Daud regime for the first time moved forces closer to the Pakistan border, which resulted into reciprocal deployment from Pakistan. But by 1976 Daud realized that his policies towards Pakistan were causing his government more harm than good. Daud agreed to recognize the Durand Line as the boundary between Pakistan and Afghanistan. However, before the agreement was signed, Bhutto was removed by General Zia-ul-Haq in a 1977 military coup d'état. A similar agreement was then reached between General Zia and Daud, but this time Daud’s overthrow by Soviet-backed forces in April 1978 derailed the settlement.

              Demands associated with Pashtunistan lost much of their meaning following the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in December 1979, following which the Durand Line became quite porous, with a massive influx of Afghan refugees into Pakistan.
              ----------

              *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

              Originally posted by Karachi
              like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

              Comment


              • #8
                Pashtunistan - 1979 - 2010

                By the late 1970s, Pakistan had settled the insurgencies in Baluchistan and Pashtunistan, but when the Soviets invaded Afghanistan they installed a communist regime that was openly hostile to Pakistan. Pakistan did not fear outright attack from the much weaker Afghan military, but India’s support for Afghanistan’s claims on Pakistani territory had long created unrest among Pakistani military planners, who dreaded the prospect of a major two-front war.

                The Soviet backed Kabul regime raised the question of the Durand Line, that is, the rightful boundary between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Since raising the Pashtunistan issue on the day of the coup, the Daud Government issued a series of public statements and private demarches alleging Pakistani "provocations" which could lead to "serious consequences" and to which Afghanistan "cannot remain indifferent": delivered a strong attack at the Algiers nonaligned conference on Pakistan's treatment of the Pathans; and arrested and detained a body of Pakistan's Frontier Scouts which strayed across Afghanistan's borders.
                In response, Pakistan: announced that nomadic Afghan tribesmen, who normally winter in Pakistan, will not be permitted to enter without "travel documents," which have never been issued to them before; reinforced its border with Afghanistan by deploying two fighter squadrons to Quetta, two infantry battalions to the Quetta border, and army units to replace border guards elsewhere; indeed, President Bhutto confirmed to Ambassador Helms that he was abandoning Pakistan's policy of rear deployment for the army; reactivated a dormant army roadbuilding project close to the border.

                Wali contributed to tensions by implying publicly that he is moving toward secession and that he would seek outside assistance in a confrontation with Bhutto. Bhutto’s reaction has been to arrest about 500 of Wali's NAP supporters.

                Kabul's "forward policy" had been implemented with words, but the rhetoric had been inflammatory and provocative. Pakistan's reaction, while short of belligerence, has been reinforced with military moves. Both governments have assured us that they seek a peaceful solution and good relations, but neither has made moves to seek from, or to give to, the other assurances of peaceful intent. At present, Afghanistan and Pakistan are heading toward confrontation, and their domestic compulsions appear sufficiently strong to drive them farther down this road in the coming months.

                Wali Khan, son of Abdul Ghafar Khan [the “Frontier Ghandi”] pursued a pragmatic line for a Pashtun homeland, but was mostly ambiguous under the banner of the National Awami Party (NAP). Evenutally, the relative prosperity of the Pashtuns, and their increased integration into the armed forces and among federal administrative elites, led to Pashtunistan dying a natural death.

                By the late-1990s, the Taliban eraa in Afghanistan fostered a Pashtun Nationalism, albeit of an Islamic character, and tribal leaders of the NWFP started viewing themselves as Muslims and Pashtuns. They did not want to secede from Pakistan, but wanted autonomy with regard to language, identity, and political aspirations. They provided Kabul with ample opportunity to raise the Pashtunistan issue even more vigorously.

                September 11th changed the situation of Pashtunistan. After the Taliban’s overthrow in 2001 and India’s return to the Afghan scene, Pakistan began to fear that New Delhi’s renewed presence would reactivate the Afghan claim to “Greater Pashtunistan.”

                In July 2003 there were clashes between Pakistan and Afghan security forces, and the Pakistani embassy in Kabul was ransacked on July 8, 2003. About two-thousand Afghans, including some government officials, took to the streets of Kabul to protest alleged border incursions by Pakistani troops. Several dozen protesters broke away from the rally and entered the Pakistani embassy. Afghan officials say the group smashed windows and other furniture, but no staff members were hurt. Local security forces quickly evicted the protesters and sealed off the diplomatic mission.

                The November 2008 Global Trends 2025 report by Thomas Fingar, the US Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Analysis, suggested that "The future of Pakistan is a wildcard in considering the trajectory of neighboring Afghanistan. Pakistan’s Northwest Frontier Province and tribal areas probably will continue to be poorly governed and the source or supporter of cross-border instability. If Pakistan is unable to hold together until 2025, a broader coalescence of Pashtun tribes is likely to emerge and act together to erase the Durand Line, maximizing Pashtun space at the expense of Punjabis in Pakistan and Tajiks and others in Afghanistan.

                Alternatively, the Taliban and other Islamist activists might prove able to overawe at least some tribal politics."
                ----------

                *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

                Originally posted by Karachi
                like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

                Comment


                • #9
                  Why was their even a referendum in creating Pakistan? Clearly Punjab and Pashtunistan belong to the Afghans, and it should have been returnee to them. India gotten their freedom, and it was for the Hindus. The Muslim Punjab"s and Baluch should have been returned to and reunited with the Afghan nation/Empire. I don't wanna appear and Pakistan, but creating an "independent" Muslim nation in original Afghan land was wrong. And clearly shows what is wrong with Muslims, and their anti-unity nature.

                  Instead of two separate Muslim nations, it should have/could have been an empire. Russia would have thinking twice to try to invade a united Afghan/Punjab/Baluch empire, Taliban would have never existed, and we coulda set am example in uniting all Muslims under one banner, but look what happened.
                  afsus!
                  Last edited by کیش; 01-12-2011, 11:30 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Idiot that would be a dream too good to be true, but my friend us muslims cant even sacrifice a 'name' everynation has its pride and doesnt want to be called under another nations banner, all muslims in that region should have united current afghanistan,pakistan even stretched out to Iran under 1 sole empire of muslims, by now we'd be a superpower..my dear Idiot this is so unimaginable to not have civil wars that we would call your theory 'wild'.. but after my wish for this 'wild theory' and cannot unite all the muslims then i wish for a sole pashtun country, not afghanistan, not pakistan but pashtunistan
                    ----------

                    *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

                    Originally posted by Karachi
                    like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Manzareh View Post
                      Idiot that would be a dream too good to be true, but my friend us muslims cant even sacrifice a 'name' everynation has its pride and doesnt want to be called under another nations banner, all muslims in that region should have united current afghanistan,pakistan even stretched out to Iran under 1 sole empire of muslims, by now we'd be a superpower..my dear Idiot this is so unimaginable to not have civil wars that we would call your theory 'wild'.. but after my wish for this 'wild theory' and cannot unite all the muslims then i wish for a sole pashtun country, not afghanistan, not pakistan but pashtunistan
                      I know, unfortunately this will never happen. My dad so hates Pakistan, that he will never change. He hates Pakistan, and am not even talking about Punjab (he likes Punjabis and Sindhi"s) but like places/people from KP, FATA, and Baluchistan. He doesn't view them as Pashtuns anymore, I have arguments with him about this, he just went to Afghanistan and unfortunately we last talked on a bad note.

                      We aren't just disunited as ever, but both peoples are the laughing stock of the world.

                      Damn.
                      Last edited by کیش; 01-13-2011, 11:39 AM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Idiot View Post
                        Why was their even a referendum in creating Pakistan? Clearly Punjab and Pashtunistan belong to the Afghans, and it should have been returnee to them. India gotten their freedom, and it was for the Hindus. The Muslim Punjab"s and Baluch should have been returned to and reunited with the Afghan nation/Empire. I don't wanna appear and Pakistan, but creating an "independent" Muslim nation in original Afghan land was wrong. And clearly shows what is wrong with Muslims, and their anti-unity nature.

                        Instead of two separate Muslim nations, it should have/could have been an empire. Russia would have thinking twice to try to invade a united Afghan/Punjab/Baluch empire, Taliban would have never existed, and we coulda set am example in uniting all Muslims under one banner, but look what happened.
                        afsus!
                        jinah and other anti muslim movements happened
                        they came and destroyd this same dream of muslims instead created a buffer state between Afghanistan and india because they were scared that Afghanistan will once Again come for India ,so they created this little monster to devide the muslims under the banner of seculerism and nationalism.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Manzareh View Post
                          Idiot that would be a dream too good to be true, but my friend us muslims cant even sacrifice a 'name' everynation has its pride and doesnt want to be called under another nations banner, all muslims in that region should have united current afghanistan,pakistan even stretched out to Iran under 1 sole empire of muslims, by now we'd be a superpower..my dear Idiot this is so unimaginable to not have civil wars that we would call your theory 'wild'.. but after my wish for this 'wild theory' and cannot unite all the muslims then i wish for a sole pashtun country, not afghanistan, not pakistan but pashtunistan
                          lol you compare afghanistan to punjab and iran
                          you are as ignorant as a rock.

                          there will never ever be a pashtunistan,a pashtun only country because the whole term is racist.Pukhtunkhwa on the otherhand is a good name,which means side of pashtuns or pro pashtun.
                          once again let me remind you,when you abuse or deny Afghanistan its like abusing and denying your own mother.So choose your words carefully.
                          there will be inshallah a muslim united ummah but first we need pashtun unity and than we can have our tajik brothers to look to tajikistan for our national and muslim benefits,uzbeks to uzbekistan,turkmen to turkmenistan punjabis to india etc etc

                          stop margenalizing us

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Idiot View Post
                            I know, unfortunately this will never happen. My dad so hates Pakistan, that he will never change. He hates Pakistan, and am not even talking about Punjab (he likes Punjabis and Sindhi"s) but like places/people from KP, FATA, and Baluchistan. He doesn't view them as Pashtuns anymore, I have arguments with him about this, he just went to Afghanistan and unfortunately we last talked on a bad note.

                            We aren't just disunited as ever, but both peoples are the laughing stock of the world.

                            Damn.
                            the way i see it
                            it will happen like this:durrand line will be erased pukhtunkhwa up to jalalabad kunar laghman,to the middle paktia paktika,down to kandahar,ghazni helmand will be cultural centre of pukhtane.

                            there will be media,universities,and this all in Pukhto.we have pukhtane who are bilangual in pashto and urdu so they can serve as contact to far right over the pukhtunkhwa and pashtuns speaking pashto dari can be contact to far left Afghans who speak dari.
                            the other ethnicities can will be pro pukhtane once we show them how seriouse this is .
                            the tajiks can have better contacts with tajikistan under the name of Islam but work for th ebetter ment of the Afghan nation,uzbek to uzbekistan,turkment to turkmenistan,the remaining can work internally.
                            kabul will eb neutral city with all types of people living in it,so will be Islamabad.
                            Inshallah

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Idiot View Post
                              I know, unfortunately this will never happen. My dad so hates Pakistan, that he will never change. He hates Pakistan, and am not even talking about Punjab (he likes Punjabis and Sindhi"s) but like places/people from KP, FATA, and Baluchistan. He doesn't view them as Pashtuns anymore, I have arguments with him about this, he just went to Afghanistan and unfortunately we last talked on a bad note.

                              We aren't just disunited as ever, but both peoples are the laughing stock of the world.

                              Damn.

                              As a brother would i advise you to speak to your dad, lifes too short for grudges, patna's and wrana's..people have their own opinions its normal even if you dont agree.
                              ----------

                              *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

                              Originally posted by Karachi
                              like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X