Is Subservience to Non-Pashtuns Against our Culture?

[erlangner]

There can be something like unifictaion on the basis of religion for example OIC etc and its head can be from some other country, where Afghans (pashtuns) will have the freedom to say good bye anytime. However to have government of others on our land seems too much unacceptable, and we can see the consequences of Arabs and Punjabi rule although they are in the background, but our land is destroyed.

I will not say who are dallagan and who are not, but in my opinion it will be difficult to decide for soemone else ruling me in my own land.

[Nadir Shah]

I am aware I was just referring to the fact that Shlombay can sometimes become our resident Qandahari Emperor, LOL



I agree completely, though I would like the said ruler to be an Afghan Good Muslim.

Malgariya, your new malicious campaign is to divide the Pashtun/Afghans along tribal lines. The tribal card or factor is largely misplaced in the 21st century.

[Nadir Shah]

Sangar, but you also have to realize historically when someone rules they work for there people.

A Tajik would not care about Pashto for example.

Not true. This scenario would emerge if a government is overwhelmigly Tajik, which is not possible. When there is the rule of law and constitution, then both the languages shall enjoy equal status.

[Nadir Shah]

well, Pashtuns ruled the whole region. They built palaces, roads and more in India, Northern Afghanistan, modern day Pakistan.

So why can't a non-Pashtun do the same ting?

Why didn't Pashtun rulers do anything beneficial for Pashtuns?

Which Pashtun ruler modernized our economy? Which Pashtun ruler built roads and infrastructure? Which Pashtun ruler modernized our education?

NONE!

While we are proud of our "Pashtun rulers", we are blind to their short comings. Especially their lack of effort in serving our country. Developing it to something modern, progressed and strong.

Malgariya, one cannot blame the Pashtuns at all. The Pashtun/Afghan Watan has been the centre of imperialist wars since the days of Ahmed Shah Baba. Tsarist Russia v British and so on. One cannot expect Afghanistan to be an Asian Tiger with the kind of situation we have faced.

[Nadir Shah]

Ianus,
but if we failed so many times it's time for change aint it?

Malgariya, we did not fail. The only time we had peace in Afghanistan, from 1933 to 1973, we were moving towards a constitutional monarchy and stability.
And I like change. Change is good. What sort of change do you want, though?

[Nadir Shah]

I want a Pashtun to bring change into the status of us Pashtuns and Pashto.

right now in this Karzai regime we have taken a hit.

Malgariya, how have we taken a hit? Are we worse of than we were in the days of the Fassad and civil war?

[erlangner]

More or less all are agreed on this, not to be subserviant.

Bas daghassay yao neem pakkay sarae igonore kawallay ham shi. Kedae shi, ghareeb de jannat heela karay wee, ao musalmanae pa haq ke ye vote warkarray wee.

[erlangner]

Erlangner if only it was practical in Pakistan all have agreed to be subserviant.

I did not understand what you mean?

[Dukhtar-e-Kabul]

Why does a Pashtun have to rule Afghanistan? Why cant a nice,caring Tajik rule it?