you are what they call a drama queen.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Liberty for Pashtun Woman
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Mabrooka, LOL, its mubarika a still common name in swabi. but she was from swat.Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View PostGhairatmand Pashtoons from Afghanistan not people who doled out Bibi Mabrooka to Babur, use this word for someone who lacks namous. it's a much more crass way of describing benamous. I generally dislike using this term, but in this case when someone is doing chaploosi after a prunish aging "farangay" cougar, it fits. How ironic you mentioned oedipal complex; but identify this woman as your mother and yet we find you hot under the collar to be her heroic Romeo. I don't want to even begin to examine what Freudian issues you're projecting here.
Anyways my morani khpelwan is from Yemen, we never had any issue with Jews, keep grasping though.
That great ghazi of Islam had 10 wives (4 short of MO) but I dont recall him getting a yemeni, probably did not need that alliance to allow his army to pass safely. However Legend has it, that a yousafzai grandpa did bring a arab grandma on the way back from hajj and thus injected some much needed arabic DNA amongst our midst. I wonder if he grabbed a bedouin or she was a shudra from dehli and he pretended she was Mo's great grand daughter, like hajis filling 'abay zamzam' from the local 'khuwarr' and pretended they dragged the 50 gallon gerican from hijaz.
And I forgot about the jews, yes you are right mohammad had them eradicated from arabia (included yemen) in his lifetime, what did you call it, yes purged, thats right. If that is not an issue than what is. I think to rectify that, descendent's of those slaughtered in Khaiber ie every jew should be given 32 acres and a mule (or three arabai/yemeni toor-sarri if they would accept something of a lesser value) in hijaz.Last edited by Baygham; 03-08-2011, 02:12 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Baygham View PostMabrooka, LOL, its mubarika a still common name in swabi. but she was from swat.
That great ghazi of Islam had 10 wives (4 short of MO) but I dont recall him getting a yemeni, probably did not need that alliance to allow his army to pass safely. However Legend has it, that a yousafzai grandpa did bring a arab grandma on the way back from hajj and thus injected some much needed arabic DNA amongst our midst. I wonder if he grabbed a bedouin or she was a shudra from dehli and he pretended she was Mo's great grand daughter, like hajis filling 'abay zamzam' from the local 'khuwarr' and pretended they dragged the 50 gallon gerican from hijaz.
And I forgot about the jews, yes you are right mohammad had them eradicated from arabia (included yemen) in his lifetime, what did you call it, yes purged, thats right. If that is not an issue than what is. I think to rectify that, descendent's of those slaughtered in Khaiber ie every jew should be given 32 acres and a mule (or three arabai/yemeni toor-sarri if they would accept something of a lesser value) in hijaz.
haha you're a deceitful and manipulative critter; but I won't let your corrupt underhanded agenda distort or misrepresent another issue and take this out of context; when I said purged I mean behavior and practices, not people.
Even then however you're completely wrong, the Bani Quraiza and Bani Nadhir were trying to exterminate the Muslims, Muslims acted preemptively when it was revealed they were plotting with the Quraish. And even then the ruling to kill the perpetrators in these clans was not done by Muhammad(saw)'s dictates it was done by the dictates of Jewish Law, because when it was asked of them "what would the Jews have done in the case of defeating the Muslims?" They replied "kill off the males". So it was decided by their own decision for their fate.
EVEN THEN, Numerous of the Sahaba were Jews from Bani Quraiza or Bani Nadhir.
So another bogus warped portrayal of history shunned and debunked.
Now Yemen, Yemen has ALWAYS had Jews, look up Yemenite Jews. Only in the last century had tensions between Yemenite Jews and Muslims had ever become an issue; for the most part of 1400 years, they lived in Yemen no problem. Intrinsic Jewish animosity is an IMPERIALISTICALLY manufactured illusion, something you seem to want to perpetuate with Muslims in general.
Comment
-
We are talking about ISLAM NOT ARABS. It is you that is twisting this, I have asked you few questions if you have any answers for them then it is time that you spit them out. Other wise change your name to Teezana and shut the hell up.Originally posted by Toramana View PostEdge, you are a bogus person not hesistant to twist disciplines of knowledges to further the Arab agenda...may be due to typical Arab inferiority complex....
If said anything more about me, I will be very very tough with you....
Comment
-
I have been preaching this for a long time. Americans should apply sharia law for war as per the sunnah in iraq and afghanistan.Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View Posthaha you're a deceitful and manipulative critter; but I won't let your corrupt underhanded agenda distort or misrepresent another issue and take this out of context; when I said purged I mean behavior and practices, not people.
Even then however you're completely wrong, the Bani Quraiza and Bani Nadhir were trying to exterminate the Muslims, Muslims acted preemptively when it was revealed they were plotting with the Quraish. And even then the ruling to kill the perpetrators in these clans was not done by Muhammad(saw)'s dictates it was done by the dictates of Jewish Law, because when it was asked of them "what would the Jews have done in the case of defeating the Muslims?" They replied "kill off the males". So it was decided by their own decision for their fate.
EVEN THEN, Numerous of the Sahaba were Jews from Bani Quraiza or Bani Nadhir.
So another bogus warped portrayal of history shunned and debunked.
Now Yemen, Yemen has ALWAYS had Jews, look up Yemenite Jews. Only in the last century had tensions between Yemenite Jews and Muslims had ever become an issue; for the most part of 1400 years, they lived in Yemen no problem. Intrinsic Jewish animosity is an IMPERIALISTICALLY manufactured illusion, something you seem to want to perpetuate with Muslims in general.
As per the chief mullah, they would round up the males, distribute the women amongst the soldiers (only the good looking young and able), and impose jazia on the ugly and leftovers. What do you think, will that satisfy you and your dream of american islam will come to fruition.Last edited by Baygham; 03-08-2011, 11:12 AM.
Comment
-
Basically when the Jews were proven guilty and were going to be sentenced they asked for the sentencing to be done according to the Jewish Law.Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View Posthaha you're a deceitful and manipulative critter; but I won't let your corrupt underhanded agenda distort or misrepresent another issue and take this out of context; when I said purged I mean behavior and practices, not people.
Even then however you're completely wrong, the Bani Quraiza and Bani Nadhir were trying to exterminate the Muslims, Muslims acted preemptively when it was revealed they were plotting with the Quraish. And even then the ruling to kill the perpetrators in these clans was not done by Muhammad(saw)'s dictates it was done by the dictates of Jewish Law, because when it was asked of them "what would the Jews have done in the case of defeating the Muslims?" They replied "kill off the males". So it was decided by their own decision for their fate.
EVEN THEN, Numerous of the Sahaba were Jews from Bani Quraiza or Bani Nadhir.
So another bogus warped portrayal of history shunned and debunked.
Now Yemen, Yemen has ALWAYS had Jews, look up Yemenite Jews. Only in the last century had tensions between Yemenite Jews and Muslims had ever become an issue; for the most part of 1400 years, they lived in Yemen no problem. Intrinsic Jewish animosity is an IMPERIALISTICALLY manufactured illusion, something you seem to want to perpetuate with Muslims in general.
The sentencing was then passed on to one from their own tribe, who was a Sahabi, and he gave the sentence ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF JEWS.
Now if this moron is twisting this piece of history then he is taking all of us for stupids cause he think we are like his dope head friends that will give a wah wah at his every Islam bashing.
Really is this all these Islam Bashers have got left to throw at us.
Bunch of retards.
Comment
-
The difference is though, Americans are the PERPETRATORS, where as the Muslims were the reactors. Muslims wanted to live and let live, Bani Nadhir and Quraiza, just wouldn't have it. So what was done had to be done or else Nadhir and Quraiza would simply continue, Muslims gave these groups numerous chances to reconcile. If they had not had consistent plots to exterminate Muslims in the first place none of this would have happened.Originally posted by Baygham View PostI have been preaching this for a long time. Americans should apply sharia law for war as per the sunnah in iraq and afghanistan.
As per the chief mullah, they would round up the males, distribute the women amongst the soldiers (only the good looking young and able), and impose jazia on the ugly and leftovers. What do you think, will that satisfy you and your dream of american islam will come to fruition.
Just like in traffic only one person has the right of way. The right of way here goes to the non-corrupt. America, in all it's genocide of Natives who were simply resisting a foreign invader, destroying mass swaths of forests, polluting nature to no ends, wasting resources to no end, cultivating a decadent society. I think it's clear they would not have the right of way here.
And correction, there is no "Sunnah" as you described, the verdict was not an Islamic Law but a Law the Jews wanted for themselves. So you're wrong by a technicality
Comment
-
If muhammad did it, it is sunnah, you can apologize all you want.Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View PostThe difference is though, Americans are the PERPETRATORS, where as the Muslims were the reactors. Muslims wanted to live and let live, Bani Nadhir and Quraiza, just wouldn't have it. So what was done had to be done or else Nadhir and Quraiza would simply continue, Muslims gave these groups numerous chances to reconcile. If they had not had consistent plots to exterminate Muslims in the first place none of this would have happened.
Just like in traffic only one person has the right of way. The right of way here goes to the non-corrupt. America, in all it's genocide of Natives who were simply resisting a foreign invader, destroying mass swaths of forests, polluting nature to no ends, wasting resources to no end, cultivating a decadent society. I think it's clear they would not have the right of way here.
And correction, there is no "Sunnah" as you described, the verdict was not an Islamic Law but a Law the Jews wanted for themselves. So you're wrong by a technicality
Captive jews, slaughter, that is sunnah. And for war booty, Get the beautiful married safiya aged only 17, kill her father and husband and get her in bed that very night. You can call it a love marriage, I dont care, do have the guts to call a spade a spade. As they say if it quacks like a duck and looks like a duck it is a duck. You can quote 10thousand hadith and have 1000 ilhams and 'wahi's' it will still remain a rape and war booty.
There is no role model here, this is the exact behaviour taliban did to muslims war booty in kabul, the mujahideen before them, the paki muslim soldiers in bangladesh, even today, as we speak, the liberators in Libya are slaughtering african blacks (including arab muslim black sudanese migrant workers) and raping the women. Perfect sunnah.Last edited by Baygham; 03-08-2011, 03:04 PM.
Comment
-
are you talking about yourself again.Originally posted by Bayghamgo blow yourself up so the hoors can unplug you so you calm down. It has backed up too much you need a release, dont see it happening here in this hell hole dunya, that will require too much effort, its quite easy up there. Pooof one minute and the next minute you will be teleported to the company of 72 luscious ........................., for the rest read your scripture.
i could reply with the same level as you but no i will not because thats exactly the point of lowlife vermins such as you.
it make sme happy to know no person in real life exists such as you so you come on the internet to have your pathetic life.
now go back into the hole you came from.
Comment
-
You know what comes to mind when you read this idiot's posts..?Originally posted by Baygham View PostIf muhammad did it, it is sunnah, you can apologize all you want.
Captive jews, slaughter, that is sunnah. And for war booty, Get the beautiful married safiya aged only 17, kill her father and husband and get her in bed that very night. You can call it a love marriage, I dont care, do have the guts to call a spade a spade. As they say if it quacks like a duck and looks like a duck it is a duck. You can quote 10thousand hadith and have 1000 ilhams and 'wahi's' it will still remain a rape and war booty.
There is no role model here, this is the exact behaviour taliban did to muslims war booty in kabul, the mujahideen before them, the paki muslim soldiers in bangladesh, even today, as we speak, the liberators in Libya are slaughtering african blacks (including arab muslim black sudanese migrant workers) and raping the women. Perfect sunnah.
A road runner with its head stuck up its ass.
He is all over the place, he makes no sense with his pseudo philosophical intellectualism. His knowledge of history is that of a crack-cocaine addict trying to speed read the world history in 10 minutes. I bet he jerks off after writing every post, as bull ****ting gives him a sense of value, a reason for existence.
JEWS ASKED FOR THE PUNISHMENT TO BE FROM JEWISH LAW AND IT WAS DECIDED BY A SAHABI WHO WAS ONE OF THEM.
It was their desire not the desire of Prophet Muhammed so it does not constitute as Sunnah. If anything only thing that can be Sunnah here is that Prophet Muhammed respected their desire of being sentenced according to their own religion. It shows religious tolerance of Prophet Muhammed.
Do you get it now?
Which part of this you do not understand? Or more realistically you just simply dont want to understand and want to mislead others too.
Now about Ummul Momineen Safiya (Rta) and her age at the time of marriage, She had been married to Kinana ibn al-Rabi before She married Muhammad (saw). Prophet Muhammed could have had her like a slave but He decided to give her the honour of a Wife.
She never expressed any regret about her decision of marrying Prophet Muhammad so who are you to show regrets on her behalf? In fact if anything She saw a dream about marrying Prophet Muhammad (saww) and when she told this dream to her then husband Kinana ibn al-Rabi, he struck her on face out of jelousy as he knew that this dream means that she will marry Prophet Muhammed.
She lived to an old age and enjoyed a very good life. So I don’t know where did you get the idea that She was not happy with the marriage with Prophet Muhammad (saww)?
It is just your malicious agenda to spread propaganda about Islam….
And that makes me wonder that who is it that you are working for and why is this forum being provided to idiots like you…. Or is this the very reason why this Pashtun Forum is set for…? In the light of all this War on Islam (war on terrorism) and the propaganda against Islam on internet the mind begs the question that why would idiots like you given a free reign to spread propaganda????
Last edited by Guest; 03-08-2011, 05:30 PM.
Comment
-
now let's play this out in real-time.Originally posted by Sangeen View PostYou know what comes to mind when you read this idiot's posts..?
A road runner with its head stuck up its ass.
He is all over the place, he makes no sense with his pseudo philosophical intellectualism. His knowledge of history is that of a crack-cocaine addict trying to speed read the world history in 10 minutes. I bet he jerks off after writing every post, as bull ****ting gives him a sense of value, a reason for existence.
JEWS ASKED FOR THE PUNISHMENT TO BE FROM JEWISH LAW AND IT WAS DECIDED BY A SAHABI WHO WAS ONE OF THEM.
It was their desire not the desire of Prophet Muhammed so it does not constitute as Sunnah. If anything only thing that can be Sunnah here is that Prophet Muhammed respected their desire of being sentenced according to their own religion. It shows religious tolerance of Prophet Muhammed.
Do you get it now?
Which part of this you do not understand? Or more realistically you just simply dont want to understand and want to mislead others too.
Now about Ummul Momineen Safiya (Rta) and her age at the time of marriage, She had been married to Kinana ibn al-Rabi before She married Muhammad (saw). Prophet Muhammed could have had her like a slave but He decided to give her the honour of a Wife.
She never expressed any regret about her decision of marrying Prophet Muhammad so who are you to show regrets on her behalf? In fact if anything She saw a dream about marrying Prophet Muhammad (saww) and when she told this dream to her then husband Kinana ibn al-Rabi, he struck her on face out of jelousy as he knew that this dream means that she will marry Prophet Muhammed.
She lived to an old age and enjoyed a very good life. So I don’t know where did you get the idea that She was not happy with the marriage with Prophet Muhammad (saww)?
It is just your malicious agenda to spread propaganda about Islam….
And that makes me wonder that who is it that you are working for and why is this forum being provided to idiots like you…. Or is this the very reason why this Pashtun Forum is set for…? In the light of all this War on Islam (war on terrorism) and the propaganda against Islam on internet the mind begs the question that why would idiots like you given a free reign to spread propaganda????
Gen. Tommy Franks running the mighty US Army Conquered the town of Jalalabad and captured 500 talibans and their families.
They were lined up, and asked what is the appropriate punishment for the mess they had created until then. Zalmay khalilzad, went over, being a pashtoon himself and asked the captured mullah omar. Omar stated that if he had caught ZK and Tommy he would chop the head off as that is their way. ZK returned and told this to tommy who had them all blasted (humanely according to talib tradition and with their consent).
Mullah omar had a young son who had a beautiful 17 year old wife. On seeing her ZK wanted to sleep with her. So he checked the war booty laws and per that law he could have her but collin powell came over and saw her too and the two started fighting. When zk realized that collin powell will outrank him he ran to Tommy frank and told him. 'Tommy there is this knockout 17 year old, why dont you assign her to yourself, she is their royalty and only worthy of you. Tommy frank called her over and was amazed at her beauty. In the mean time her father and husband were being slaughtered according to taliban tradition and per their wishes across the field. She was taken to a make shift church and married to the aged tommy who consumed the marriage that night.
Allah is great.Last edited by Baygham; 03-08-2011, 06:28 PM.
Comment
-
A Few extremely important and relevant pieces of background information
A.) the Afghans are fighting/repelling a foreign invader who is imposing itself in their country (we'll debate whether they're doing so legitimately elsewhere)
B.) the Banu Nadhir and Banu Quraiza were planning the mass extermination of Muslims. who in that situation were the active aggressors.
C.) They broke a treaty where they said they would not try to harm Muslims in anyway and yet did and were planning to do so.
D.) No Such treaty exists with the Americans. who in this situation are the active aggressor.
E.) Americans embrace a morally corrupt dysfunctional way of life with legal statutes to sanction and protect it.
F.) Banu Nadir and Banu Quraiza were tribes who strayed from the moral path of their ancestors and lived in decadence.
G.) The decision was something Banu Quraiza and Banu Nadhir, WANTED; it wasn't imposed, but requested!
H.) Saffiya, the woman in question, had a dream which by her own admission symbolizes her desire to be married to Muhammad (saw); not exactly someone who had unwilling intentions.
"It is related that she bore the mark of a bruise upon her eye; when the Prophet asked her tenderly the cause, she told him that, being yet Kināna's bride, she saw in a dream as if the moon had fallen from the heavens into her lap; and that when she told it to Kināna, he struck her violently, saying: 'What is this thy dream but that thou covetest the new king of the Ḥijāz, the Prophet, for thy husband!' The mark of the blow was the same which Moḥammad saw." cf. Muir (1912) pp. 378-379
Now factor all these in to your histrionic nonsense spewing machine, and see what you come up with
Comment
-
Originally posted by Baygham View Postnow let's play this out in real-time.
Gen. Tommy Franks running the mighty US Army Conquered the town of Jalalabad and captured 500 talibans and their families.
They were lined up, and asked what is the appropriate punishment for the mess they had created until then. Zalmay khalilzad, went over, being a pashtoon himself and asked the captured mullah omar. Omar stated that if he had caught ZK and Tommy he would chop the head off as that is their way. ZK returned and told this to tommy who had them all blasted (humanely according to talib tradition and with their consent).
Mullah omar had a young son who had a beautiful 17 year old wife. On seeing her ZK wanted to sleep with her. So he checked the war booty laws and per that law he could have her but collin powell came over and saw her too and the two started fighting. When zk realized that collin powell will outrank him he ran to Tommy frank and told him. 'Tommy there is this knockout 17 year old, why dont you assign her to yourself, she is their royalty and only worthy of you. Tommy frank called her over and was amazed at her beauty. In the mean time her father and husband were being slaughtered according to taliban tradition and per their wishes across the field. She was taken to a make shift church and married to the aged tommy who consumed the marriage that night.
Allah is great.
except the fact that the taliban and US never had an alliance together and agreed upon terms. so yeah, not really.There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.
Sayyid Qutb
Comment
-
Originally posted by Baygham View Postnow let's play this out in real-time.
Gen. Tommy Franks running the mighty US Army Conquered the town of Jalalabad and captured 500 talibans and their families.
They were lined up, and asked what is the appropriate punishment for the mess they had created until then. Zalmay khalilzad, went over, being a pashtoon himself and asked the captured mullah omar. Omar stated that if he had caught ZK and Tommy he would chop the head off as that is their way. ZK returned and told this to tommy who had them all blasted (humanely according to talib tradition and with their consent).
Mullah omar had a young son who had a beautiful 17 year old wife. On seeing her ZK wanted to sleep with her. So he checked the war booty laws and per that law he could have her but collin powell came over and saw her too and the two started fighting. When zk realized that collin powell will outrank him he ran to Tommy frank and told him. 'Tommy there is this knockout 17 year old, why dont you assign her to yourself, she is their royalty and only worthy of you. Tommy frank called her over and was amazed at her beauty. In the mean time her father and husband were being slaughtered according to taliban tradition and per their wishes across the field. She was taken to a make shift church and married to the aged tommy who consumed the marriage that night.
Allah is great.
@ Edge, graveyardofempires, Randof etc......
I don't really understand that why is it that you guys are giving him the legitimacy of being worthy of a conversation?
Honestly ... he is literately swearing at our Mother and we still go back to him and say ... oh but no it was like this.... oh no it was like that .... but let me explain it bit better to you...
When someone swear at our Mother and Sister in Bazar we should not just stand there and give him the reasons that ... No Please you misunderstood the situation my Mother is not a bad woman or my sister is not a bad woman... sir can i please correct you here ... i have few more reasons that I could give you to change your mind about my Izat.
Do you really think he is a Pashtun?
Do you really think he is one of us that has "just" lost the plot? ???????
.... Have some akal and dont give him the pleasure of disrespecting you any more. you know it very well that no matter what argument you give him he will use that opportunity to throw more abuse at you. So why give him the opportunity????????
All what he is doing here is the thing that is unthinkable for a Pashtun... Abusing our own Mother....... So he is doing it for those that are at the edge so that they can feel more confident in opening the gates of further abuse. Its like come here let me show you how you do it..... that is how you jump into a conversation and that is How you go to the core of tenets of Islam and abuse them... But the main ingredient is someone to carry a conversation with... someone that can listen to you.... someone to continue the dialogue with you .... otherwise you will be left barking like a mad dog in the middle of the night that no one bothers engaging with.
He is that Dog and we are giving him the respect of a human being by talking to him.
We explained things to him ... and he showed that it is not that he is lost but in fact that he has an agenda.... so now stop being an ingredient to his game.
Last edited by Guest; 03-09-2011, 12:17 AM.
Comment

Comment