Originally posted by gulalai
View Post
That (i.e., limited alphabet)might limit the efficiency of the software somewhat...Still, it is interesting how accurately did it categorize the words... As for introducing gaps, that is obvious looking at the limited alphabet employed to represent protien sequencing...One way to tackle this limitation would be to break words into syllables (smaller lexical units) and feed the software syllables rather (but then similarities accross syllable boundaries probably wouldn't be counted for)...
Anyhow, interesting...
@Omar Usman, these software are just symbol processing systems and are blind to the meaning of the data they process ---what they do is just to look for patterns/(sub) sequences in the character-sequences fed to them...

dar kha
Comment