I am starting this thread to share my understanding about the predominance of Dari in Afghanistan generally and in Kabul in particular. Accordingly, the historical, political and social conditions/factors that played their role in promoting Dari will be discussed.
Historical Reasons
Historically, the province of Kabul has been the source of bureaucracy for the numerous rulers of Afghanistan. That the Afghan/Pashtun rulers relied on the educated elites of Kabul (as any other rulers of Afghanistan did before the Pashtuns) to construct a functional bureaucracy was neither their fault nor was it fault of the Pashtuns; it was rather a dictate of the contemporary conditions. There are four historical reasons why Dari predominated the Afghan state: firstly, the Dari-speakers of Kabul had been the white-collar job holders and had developed skills in bureaucracy and management; secondly, Pashtuns were mainly preoccupied with forming the state of Afghanistan and were busy in political consultations and wars that were necessary to forcefully win over different tribes and ethnicities that were opposed to forming a state; thirdly, Pashtun had had no experience in running bureaucracies; fourthly and lastly, Pashto, as a language, had not developed a bureaucratic jargon.
Historical Reasons
Historically, the province of Kabul has been the source of bureaucracy for the numerous rulers of Afghanistan. That the Afghan/Pashtun rulers relied on the educated elites of Kabul (as any other rulers of Afghanistan did before the Pashtuns) to construct a functional bureaucracy was neither their fault nor was it fault of the Pashtuns; it was rather a dictate of the contemporary conditions. There are four historical reasons why Dari predominated the Afghan state: firstly, the Dari-speakers of Kabul had been the white-collar job holders and had developed skills in bureaucracy and management; secondly, Pashtuns were mainly preoccupied with forming the state of Afghanistan and were busy in political consultations and wars that were necessary to forcefully win over different tribes and ethnicities that were opposed to forming a state; thirdly, Pashtun had had no experience in running bureaucracies; fourthly and lastly, Pashto, as a language, had not developed a bureaucratic jargon.

Comment