Originally posted by Badlun
View Post
About the omitted nouns I do understand a sentence is incomplete without them, but when making a conjugation chart they are routinely omitted and the user can insert the nouns as they see fit. Given that I was asking about conjugation here, I omitted the nouns for that reason.
I guess the crux of everything is saying that, as an example, these two sentences in English would be said the exact same way:
- I was reading (a) book
- I am reading (a) book
I believe you would say that both of these sentences would either be said as "Ze yaw kitaab lawalum."
OR you would add ligya to the first sentence and the second sentence remain as "Ze yaw kitaab lawalum."
I think that sums up what your saying and I think it can be said differently.
For example, I think "What were you saying" can be said as "Si day wayil" instead of adding ligya.
Also, as to the ماضی استمراری ,this tense is closer to the past continuous and not what you mentioned in the above post. Maazeih is in the past, and istrimraareih is continuous or still happening. Something like "I was reading" I believe more accurately falls in this category, i.e., Was = Past, Reading = Continuous (the action hasn't concluded yet like it would if you said "read").
I think some conjugation charts label this as imperfect but I think it's more accurately the past continuous.
As to the gender of the noun changing the endings, I believe most casual speakers simply use the masculine in most instances, is their available a conjugation in the active voice of a verb using a noun that is feminine?
And my mistake about mistyping "ze" for "maw," in my first post.
I

Comment