NUTRITIONAL ANALYSIS AND IN SITU DIGESTION KINETICS OF GRASSES
Abstract
This study was conducted to ascertain the nutritional value, mineral profile, gross energy and in situ digestion kinetics of 10 different irrigated grasses (Malai grass/Blue Panic, Barru/Johnson grass, Mott grass, Khas Khas grass/Vetiver, Lemon grass, Dhaman grass/Bulled grass, Kallar grass, Rhodes grass, Khabal grass/Bermuda grass, Swank grass having botanical names as Panicum antidotale, Sorghum halepense, Pennisetum purpureum, Vetiveria zizanioides,Cymbopogon citrates, Cenchrus ciliaris,Leptochloa fusca,Chloris gayana, Cynodon dactylon, Panicum colunum respectively). The grasses were cut at pre-bloom stage and dried separately in forced air oven at 55Co for further analyses. After getting DM, the samples were analyzed for chemical value, mineral profile, gross energy and in situ digestion kinetics. The dry matter (DM) contents varied from 11.38% for C. gayana to 38.42% for V. zizanioides. Highest (14.28%) crude protein (CP) was observed for P. antidotale and lowest (7.90%) for P. colunum. The gross energy value of grasses ranged from 3654.28 Kcal/kg for P. antidotale to 2799 Kcal/kg for C. citrates. The C. gayana contained maximum Ca (4 g/kg DM), whereas, minimum (1.6 g/kg DM) Ca was noticed in C. ciliaris and C. dactylon. The value of Mg varied from 0.84 g/kg for L. fusca to 0.264 g/kg for C. ciliaris. Maximum Na was observed in L. fusca which was 10.5 g/kg while minimum Na was observed in V. zizanioides and C. citrates which was 2.5 g/kg DM. The amount of K varied from 27.2 g/kg to 11.6 g/kg (P. colunum to L. fusca respectively). Value of P ranged maximum in P. purpureum and C. gayana (0.59 g/kg DM) to C. ciliaris (0.14 g/kg DM). Highest DM digestibility value was observed for C. ciliaris (73.3%) while the lowest was for V. zizanioides (29.5%). Highest nutrient detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility value was observed for P. antidotale (67.96%) while the lowest was for L. fusca (27.37%). The data of the present study regarding DM, CP, NDF, ADF, ash, gross energy and mineral profile revealed that the nutritional value of grasses is worth if to feed the ruminants. The shorter lag time, faster rate of digestion and high extent of digestion further rank these grasses to feed ruminants for productive purposes. However, additional research is warranted to evaluate these grasses for secondary metabolites (Tannins, Saponins, total Phenolics and also Hydrocyanic acid) which are health hazards for ruminants.

Comment