The Collapse of the Theory of Evolution in 20 Questions

[Afghanistan2010]

Asalam alykum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh,

the absolute defeat of the evolution theory in 20 questions in Arabic, Deutsch, Español, Français, Türkçe, Indonesia, Azerbaijani

share it forward please


http://www.harunyahya.com/20questions01.php

Introduction

THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION has been around for 150 years, and has had a great influence on the way people look at the world. It proposes the lie that they came into this world as the result of chance and that they are a "species of animal." Furthermore, it teaches them that the only law in life is a selfish struggle for survival and to stay alive. The effects of this idea can be clearly seen in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries: people's increasing selfishness, the moral degeneration in society, the rapid spread of self-interest, ruthlessness, and violence, the development of totalitarian and bloody ideologies such as fascism and communism, social and individual crises as people grow distant from the morality of religion,…
The social results of the theory of evolution have been examined in other books of this author. (see Harun Yahya's The Disasters Darwinism Brought to Humanity, Communism Lies in Ambush, The Black Magic of Darwinism, and The Religion of Darwinism). It is revealed in these books that this theory, which claims to be "scientific," actually has no scientific basis at all, that it is a scenario stubbornly defended in the face of all the facts, consisting of nothing but superstitions.
It is essential that those who wish to learn about the true nature of the theory of evolution and the Darwinian "worldview" that has systematically dragged the world towards violence, savagery, ruthlessness, and conflict for the last 150 years turn to those books.
This book will consider the invalidity of the theory of evolution at a more general level. Evolutionists' claims on certain matters will be responded to with questions that are frequently asked, the meanings of which are not entirely understood. The answers provided in this book can be found in more scientific detail in those of this author's books such as The Evolution Deceit, and Darwinism Refuted.

[Badlun]

Being a lazy Muslim he has tried unsuccessfully to reject the social,philosophical and other non non-scientific aspects of the theory of Evolution but has not rejected the concept that Evolution is the change across successive generations in the heritable characteristics of biological populations.

Similarly he has failed to reject that Evolutionary processes which you give rise to diversity at every level of biological organisation, including species, individual organisms and molecules such as DNA and proteins. He has not refuted repeated speciation , natural selection and that the divergence of life can be traced through shared sets of biochemical and morphological traits, or by shared DNA sequences.

He has not produced any evidence that the homologous traits and sequences are more similar among species that share a more recent common ancestor, and can be used to reconstruct evolutionary histories, using both existing species and the fossil record. Existing patterns of biodiversity have been shaped both by speciation and by extinction.

[Alchemist]

Being a lazy Muslim he has tried unsuccessfully to reject the social,philosophical and other non non-scientific aspects of the theory of Evolution but has not rejected the concept that Evolution is the change across successive generations in the heritable characteristics of biological populations.

prove it

Similarly he has failed to reject that Evolutionary processes which you give rise to diversity at every level of biological organisation, including species, individual organisms and molecules such as DNA and proteins. He has not refuted repeated speciation , natural selection and that the divergence of life can be traced through shared sets of biochemical and morphological traits, or by shared DNA sequences.

natural selection has never been observed!

dna sequences are presumed to match on the premise that phlyogenetic tree is true...new data disproves the idea of a "tree" ...

He has not produced any evidence that the homologous traits and sequences are more similar among species that share a more recent common ancestor, and can be used to reconstruct evolutionary histories, using both existing species and the fossil record. Existing patterns of biodiversity have been shaped both by speciation and by extinction.

what is dubbed homologous or analogous is conjectural and arbitrary...again it is presumed to be true ...but it does not prove evolution.





are u stupid?....i mean do u have a background in biology?

cos..if u don't...don't waste time here.

[Soldat_Amir]

Why don't you convince me you can defeat Ozymedias in this topic then maybe I will take you seriously which most of you have failed at doing and resorted to name calling.

[Afghanistan2010]

If he is able to discuss the certain questions and explain to us which are not possible by him or any other scientists because they even themselves admit that there are many things that doesn't fit with the theory and which makes the theory questionable.

resistancy of bacteria,
the seestars, urchins and and
the funniest of them that when a evolutionist answers you regarding the head of the giraffe why it is so lol.

[Badlun]

I am not a biologist having a PhD but I ahve studied biology as one major in my graduate studies. I consider Evolution to be far better and more scientific fact and theory than creationism. Rather it is a fact and not just a theory as said below

Today, nearly all biologists acknowledge that evolution is a fact. The term theory is no longer appropriate except when referring to the various models that attempt to explain how life evolves... it is important to understand that the current questions about how life evolves in no way implies any disagreement over the fact of evolution.
- Neil A. Campbell, Biology 2nd ed., 1990, Benjamin/Cummings, p. 434

Also

Since Darwin's time, massive additional evidence has accumulated supporting the fact of evolution--that all living organisms present on earth today have arisen from earlier forms in the course of earth's long history. Indeed, all of modern biology is an affirmation of this relatedness of the many species of living things and of their gradual divergence from one another over the course of time. Since the publication of The Origin of Species, the important question, scientifically speaking, about evolution has not been whether it has taken place. That is no longer an issue among the vast majority of modern biologists. Today, the central and still fascinating questions for biologists concern the mechanisms by which evolution occurs.
- Helena Curtis and N. Sue Barnes, Biology 5th ed. 1989, Worth Publishers, p. 972

Theistic evolution is also the theological aspect of this theory.Survival of the fittest can be a good stimulus for Muslims instead of following fatalism and blind determinism.

[Leonine]

hasnt natural selection been observed in darwin's finches?

[Alchemist]

hasnt natural selection been observed in darwin's finches?

^ no darwin's finches are all of the same species...they are only classified by where they live, what they mainly feed on...but hybrids betw

[Alchemist]

I am not a biologist having a PhD but I ahve studied biology as one major in my graduate studies. I consider Evolution to be far better and more scientific fact and theory than creationism. Rather it is a fact and not just a theory as said below

tomatoe/tomato

Today, nearly all biologists acknowledge that evolution is a fact. The term theory is no longer appropriate except when referring to the various models that attempt to explain how life evolves... it is important to understand that the current questions about how life evolves in no way implies any disagreement over the fact of evolution.
- Neil A. Campbell, Biology 2nd ed., 1990, Benjamin/Cummings, p. 434

LOL

Why do all these guys turn to Talkorigin.com ...as if it is their bible?

In any case, the argument is fallacious. Most people used to believe that the earth was the centre of the universe, that didn't mean they were right. Popularity doesn't equate to truth.

Talk to me about facts...because I can produce a list of scientists who will tell you that they are sceptical of darwinisms.

Also

Since Darwin's time, massive additional evidence has accumulated supporting the fact of evolution--that all living organisms present on earth today have arisen from earlier forms in the course of earth's long history. Indeed, all of modern biology is an affirmation of this relatedness of the many species of living things and of their gradual divergence from one another over the course of time. Since the publication of The Origin of Species, the important question, scientifically speaking, about evolution has not been whether it has taken place. That is no longer an issue among the vast majority of modern biologists. Today, the central and still fascinating questions for biologists concern the mechanisms by which evolution occurs.
- Helena Curtis and N. Sue Barnes, Biology 5th ed. 1989, Worth Publishers, p. 972

Show me the evidence?

As a matter of fact, much of Darwin's hypothesis have been nullified and most still open ended which is why most "evolutionists" had to modify it and re-present it as "neo-darwinism". The original theory of Darwin was lamarkian...years after a "theist" named Mendal showed that heritable traits do not change and are passed down intact darwinists had to change their tune . Then Gould and his like had to invent nonsense theories like "punctuated equilibrium" to account for the lack of "transitional fossils" that Darwin predicted.

Theistic evolution is also the theological aspect of this theory.Survival of the fittest can be a good stimulus for Muslims instead of following fatalism and blind determinism.

irrelevant nonsense.



You are quoting 20 year old text books... I think your knowledge of the sciences needs to be updated before you peruse this debate.

[Alchemist]

Why don't you convince me you can defeat Ozymedias in this topic then maybe I will take you seriously which most of you have failed at doing and resorted to name calling.

ozy ??

LOL

he ran with his tail between his legs...after I gave him a schooling.

The fool didn't even know that he shared 50% DNA with his father... he found it hard to believe since he was convinced that he shared 95% with chimpanzees LOL


You guys are jokers...