Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Survey : human remains findings (1,9 Mil old) contradicts Evolution theories

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by faye View Post
    doesn't species differentiation, mean they can't procreate?
    Molecularly speciation is the formation of a new gene which becomes so different in the population that it no longer transmit the old genes to offspring. That's why quite often when you have a horse and donkey mate, they form a mule, the mule is sterile. It has information coded which is no longer compatible either of the original species.

    Comment


    • #17
      a female mule can sometimes reproduce with a hinny. that is not sterile.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by faye View Post
        a female mule can sometimes reproduce with a hinny. that is not sterile.
        that's the keyword, that's why I said often, not always, but the rate and frequency of reproduceability is not nearly as great as those mating from either parent species ....agreed?

        Comment


        • #19
          haha... that was from a quick google. well you taught me something now. i never knew about the mule not being able to reproduce with another mule and never heard of a hinny before.

          Comment


          • #20
            well eventually species become so differentiated that they can no longer mate, but mating and the ability to with parent species demonstrates genetic drift

            Comment


            • #21
              i won't drift on that at the moment. i was just reading about wolpoffs multiple evolution theory. intersting. you guys sure have to be able to remember a lot of things for all of these studies.
              be terrible after all that effort to find that it is wrong.

              Comment


              • #22
                well Faye I'm not an evolutionary biologist, I just have a functional understanding of how evolution operates (watch Mustafa walk in to jump all over me). But I do have more information than someone like Alchemist, or people who have not had any basic information on evolutionary biology.

                If you want a complete and rigorous explanation of how it works what I suggest is to actually discuss it with evolutionary biologists or people who study it. I have a few people you could correspond with. In fact one of them I'm trying to set up a debate with Mustafa aka Alchemist, because none of us are as knowledgeable as he is and he hs effectively refuted every source we present as being a sham (I'm being sarcastic about that by the way), so we'll see how his arguments stand the test of scrutiny with someone directly involved in the field. so he can inform them how he has refuted evolution.

                However I'm sure they'll happily discuss it with you as well.

                Comment


                • #23
                  i definitely find it all very interesting and that is how you should present, instead of proving to win.
                  but i am most interested in the quantum mechanics stuff, to see where that goes.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    that's a different topic....but one I find fascinating as well

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View Post
                      that's a different topic....but one I find fascinating as well
                      My son,

                      again and again you try to change the contradicting theory with other falsehood without any clear book or revelation.

                      my son,

                      i have many times discussion with atheist who came with the same idea like you and other supporters of evolution but stil couldnt convince not just me but even themselves how the first cell came ...but these neo christians said it was by god and then a self evolution happend,but i asked them and where did adam came from ? while he had no parents and will never happen....and i asked them about stone age ? which never ever took place because there are no evidence that people lived like animals rather they lived a civilized life.


                      my son,

                      the evoultion is greatly discribed by people like neil shubin and others,i came around books like "the inner fish" or "Good and Evil - by a german autor"....but they are contradicting themselves because like the inner fish neil shubin has a fav issue which talks about a fish that started to walk on land ( this thing stil exists it is called devilsnake or so in europe ) but he found the same remains of this animal and presented it as a first sign of the fish that went on land...but he could not explain many things he failed in his falsehood rather shaytan made him and other followers of evolution their thing good but they are followers of iblis.

                      my son , no one until now could explain evolution because this is all a fairy tale.
                      High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View Post
                        Molecularly speciation is the formation of a new gene which becomes so different in the population that it no longer transmit the old genes to offspring. That's why quite often when you have a horse and donkey mate, they form a mule, the mule is sterile. It has information coded which is no longer compatible either of the original species.
                        LOL

                        old genes?

                        wow ...

                        please stfu and stop butchering biology.


                        the mule can't procreate because it has 63 chromosomes ...thats an odd number, you need an even number to create two gamest to form pairs of chromsomes!

                        this bs about old genes not being able to pass because of "new genes" ...shows how ignorant you are.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          i.e. can no longer transmit genes to offspring .....ergo, the two parents groups have undergone specification.


                          dimwit

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            oooooh yes and alchemist ......would you like to participate in a debate on evolution with people who are experts in biology and/or related subjects and do research in this field

                            since you know you're so much more knowledgeable than a light weight like myself in the subject (sarcasm).

                            tell me what you think ...and we'll broadcast your arguments via youtube .....would you agree to participate?

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Afghanistan2010 View Post
                              My son,

                              again and again you try to change the contradicting theory with other falsehood without any clear book or revelation.

                              my son,

                              i have many times discussion with atheist who came with the same idea like you and other supporters of evolution but stil couldnt convince not just me but even themselves how the first cell came ...but these neo christians said it was by god and then a self evolution happend,but i asked them and where did adam came from ? while he had no parents and will never happen....and i asked them about stone age ? which never ever took place because there are no evidence that people lived like animals rather they lived a civilized life.


                              my son,

                              the evoultion is greatly discribed by people like neil shubin and others,i came around books like "the inner fish" or "Good and Evil - by a german autor"....but they are contradicting themselves because like the inner fish neil shubin has a fav issue which talks about a fish that started to walk on land ( this thing stil exists it is called devilsnake or so in europe ) but he found the same remains of this animal and presented it as a first sign of the fish that went on land...but he could not explain many things he failed in his falsehood rather shaytan made him and other followers of evolution their thing good but they are followers of iblis.

                              my son , no one until now could explain evolution because this is all a fairy tale.

                              We have observed instances of evolution actually occurring ....now stop peaking out of ignorance please.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View Post
                                i.e. can no longer transmit genes to offspring .....ergo, the two parents groups have undergone specification.


                                dimwit
                                dimwit?

                                You can't even compose a proper biology statement and you want to host a youtube debate?

                                specification?ftw does that even mean?
                                the two parent groups have undergone speciation? LOL
                                because a mule is born of a donkey and a horse that is proof of what? that the donkey and the horse's common ancestor was a mule?


                                A light weight?
                                Buddy...you are not even a contender, let alone an amature feather weight. You keep punching your self in the face and I don't even have to lift a finger...just observe you make an ass out of yourself.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X