Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Scientist Says Immortality Only 20 Years Away

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Scientist Says Immortality Only 20 Years Away

    Ray Kurzweil, a world-renowned scientist and author of The Singularity is Near, thinks the world as we know it will be unrecognizable in 20 years.

    One of the changes he thinks are possible: Scientists may finally crack immortality.

    "I and many other scientists now believe that in around 20 years we will have the means to reprogramme our bodies' stone-age software so we can halt, then reverse, aging," he writes in The Sun. "Then nanotechnology will let us live for ever. Ultimately, nanobots will replace blood cells and do their work thousands of times more effectively."

    Kurzweil, whose fans include Bill Gates adn Bill Clinton, makes a number of other substantial claims, such as humans being able to replace all failing organs with artificial ones. He says we'll be able to scuba dive for hours without oxygen, and write entire books within minutes thanks to advanced nanotechnology.

    Oh, virtual sex will also be commonplace in the not-so-distant future.

    Kurzweil's absurd-sounding proclamations stem from the fact that technological progress is growing at an exponential rate.

    "Computer technology and our understanding of genes — our body’s software programs — are accelerating at an incredible rate," he writes. His theory of the Law of Accelerating Returns, suggests there will be another "billion-fold" increase in technology over the next quarter century.

    "In reality, the time needed for technology to double is constantly decreasing," Inc's Kevin Bailey explains. "The next thing to realize with an exponential curve, is that at a certain point progress relative to time skyrockets up. The increase in technology that once took 20 years now takes 10, and then 5, and then 2.5, and then 1.25, and then .75 years, and then on and on. Kurzweil claims that we are right at the beginning of the sharp upturn that's characteristic of exponential curves."

    Kurzweil thinks we're just beginning to tap into the possibilities artificial intelligence can bring, and the advancements will only get more wild. We're already using it in small ways to help us land airplanes and conduct searches on Google.

    "These technologies should not seem at all fanciful," says Kurzweil. "Our phones now perform tasks we wouldn’t have dreamed possible 20 years ago. When I was a student in 1965, my university’s only computer cost £7million and was huge."

    Kurzweil concludes, "We can look forward to a world where humans become cyborgs, with artificial limbs and organs."

    Please follow Business Insider on Twitter and Facebook.

    Join the conversation about this story »


  • #2
    Just imagine, people producing and raising many generations in the same life-span. The implication of this would be huge overpopulation and strain on resources being some.
    Last edited by Toramana; 07-16-2012, 07:32 PM.

    Comment


    • #3
      this is the problem with science and scientists. they are all individuals with individual desires. so, we get things like atomic bombs, toxic chemicals etc, being created and now immortality. whether it is needed or not.
      no consideration for the big overall picture, just someones personal desire of what they want to create.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by faye View Post
        this is the problem with science and scientists. they are all individuals with individual desires. so, we get things like atomic bombs, toxic chemicals etc, being created and now immortality. whether it is needed or not.
        no consideration for the big overall picture, just someones personal desire of what they want to create.
        Some scientists argue, their primary duty is to pursue the truth without moral considerations coming into play. Others say, moral considerations are important in scientific exploration.

        Comment


        • #5
          yes. i think the discoveries of some scientists can be amazing. i love and admire some of their capabilities and knowledge but to allow these people to have so much free range is questionable. some of the rubbish they create is obscene.
          depleted uranium and many other poisons which is then used and abused by others.
          not enough of these scientists are whistleblowing to warn against the dangers of some of their inventions.

          Comment


          • #6
            faye you wouldn't be here in your ripe old age of the 60's if it weren't for these scientists exploring how to improve health.

            Why do people fear knowledge so much just because knowledge has been abused by some people?
            [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

            2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by faye View Post
              yes. i think the discoveries of some scientists can be amazing. i love and admire some of their capabilities and knowledge but to allow these people to have so much free range is questionable. some of the rubbish they create is obscene.
              depleted uranium and many other poisons which is then used and abused by others.
              not enough of these scientists are whistleblowing to warn against the dangers of some of their inventions.
              I think they should be allowed to do scientific investigation for that is also important to asses the dangerous implications of inventions but the implementation/application of their knowledge should be subject to moral considerations.

              But who wouldn't like immortality or longevity though there are also risks associated with that e.g., boredom caused by long life, longer suffering due to incurable diseases, etc.

              Comment


              • #8
                revo, you have no proof of that statement. that is the classic xtremist claim of a scientifically minded bigot
                many people lived to ripe old ages without scientific interferences. eg:check on the people of hunza and other tribal groups with centenarian,s around the world.
                so who hates knowledge?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Faye, in so much as western society is concerned, people didn't live that long on average.
                  [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                  2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    oh, that's your proof?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      lol, yeah usually that's how it works, epidemiological studies. It's ok even all the new age hoopla you're into was rooted in some rudimentary forms of science.
                      [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                      2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        i think that is an ad-hominem. am i correct? assist me with my gaining of knowledge, oh mutazeal

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
                          faye you wouldn't be here in your ripe old age of the 60's if it weren't for these scientists exploring how to improve health.

                          Why do people fear knowledge so much just because knowledge has been abused by some people?
                          Yeah knowledge abused by people like YOU.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            i think that is also an ad-hominem, friend. behave yourself, young man!!!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by faye View Post
                              i think that is an ad-hominem. am i correct? assist me with my gaining of knowledge, oh mutazeal
                              no because I am not arguing you're "wrong" because you believe in new age hoopla , but that the same stuff you endorse were actually early forms of science.
                              [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                              2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X