Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Atheist Men: Smarter, and more Faithful

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Atheist Men: Smarter, and more Faithful

    Why you'd be stupid to cheat on your wife: Unfaithful men have lower IQs, say scientists


    Not too clever: Cheryl Cole has split from cheating husband Ashley, who is unlikely to win Mastermind, according to scientists
    Deceitful and despicable is one description that wronged wives could apply to their cheating husbands.

    Plain stupid is another. For scientists have concluded that men who sleep around are likely to have lower IQs.

    It is a finding likely to prove of interest to Cheryl Cole as she contemplates her errant partner Ashley's unfaithful ways.

    Dr Satoshi Kanazawa, an evolutionary psychologist from the London School of Economics and Political Science, said the smarter a man is, the less likely he is to cheat on his partner.

    His theory is based on the assertion that through evolutionary history, men have always been 'mildly polygamous'.

    That has changed today, however, and Dr Kanazawa explained that entering a sexually exclusive relationship is an 'evolutionarily novel' development for them.

    According to his theory, intelligent people are more likely to adopt what in evolutionary terms are new practices - to become 'more evolved'.
    Therefore, in the case of fidelity, men who cannot adapt and end up succumbing to temptation and cheating are likely to be more stupid.
    'The theory predicts that more intelligent men are more likely to value sexual exclusivity than less intelligent men,' he explained.

    According to his theory, the link between fidelity and intelligence does not apply to women because they have always been expected to be faithful to one mate - even in polygamous societies.

    'I want a quick divorce': Cheryl Cole calls time on her marriage to Ashley
    Barack Obama offers shamed golfer Tiger Woods encouragement in personal phone call of support

    Dr Kanazawa's research, in the journal Social Psychology Quarterly, also claims that intelligent people are less likely to believe in God or hold conservative views.


    Analysing the American National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, he found young adults who regarded themselves as 'very liberal' had an average IQ of 106, while those who saw themselves as 'very conservative' had an average IQ of 95.

    Golfer Tiger Woods is now most famous for his serial philandering, while Paul Newman, who died in 2008, was widely thought of as Hollywood's most faithful husband. Scientists believe Newman's way of life is 'evolutionarily novel'
    Dr Kanazawa's theory holds that self-interested, conservative attitudes are primitive in evolutionary terms, while selfless, liberal views are more advanced and linked with intelligence.

    Similarly, those who identified themselves as 'not at all religious' had an average IQ of 103, while those who saw themselves as 'very religious' had an average IQ of 97.

    According to Dr Kanazawa, that is down to people who are smarter being more open to new ideas.

    Those who are less intelligent cling to belief in God, a relic of our evolutionary past, he added.

    'Humans are evolutionarily designed to be paranoid and they believe in God because they are paranoid.

    'This innate bias towards paranoia served humans well when self-preservation and protection of their families and clans depended on extreme vigilance to all potential dangers.

    ‘So, more intelligent children are likely to grow up to go against their natural evolutionary tendency to believe in God and they become atheists.'


    Read more: Men who cheat on their wives are 'less intelligent than faithful husbands' | Mail Online

  • #2
    Atheism is cult created by materialists

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by graveyardofempires View Post
      Atheism is cult created by materialists
      atheism is a cult created by wanna be philoshophers and "know it all"s. These people sell their souls for a small worldly gain.

      Comment


      • #4
        atheism is a personal belief... it is not created by anyone.. if someone doesnt believe in God/Gods that is their concern...
        Frater aliquis in fide nec fratrem humanitatis


        Comment


        • #5
          Kanazawa's theories on race and intelligence are controversial. Kanazawa has argued that Asian cultural traditions and/or character inhibit Asian scientific creativity[13] and that "political correctness" is a bigger threat to American evolutionary psychology than religious fundamentalism.[14] As a result, he has been accused of promoting "racist stereotypes".[15] In 2006 Kanazawa published a controversial paper suggesting that poor health of people in some nations is the result, not of poverty, but rather lower IQ.[16][17] In the British Journal of Health Psychology George T. H. Ellison wrote that the theory is based on flawed assumptions, questionable data, inappropriate analyses and biased interpretations. Ellison wrote that Kanazawa mistook statistical associations for evidence of causality and falsely concluded that populations in sub-Saharan Africa are less healthy because they are unintelligent and not because they are poor.[18] Kevin Denny wrote similar criticisms regarding the IQ data and stated that African Americans should have similar IQs when compared to the sub-Saharan African population and that Kanazawa should have measured the distance between areas in a topographical fashion.[19] P.Z. Myers, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Minnesota, has called Kanazawa "the great idiot of social science."[20]




          This Dr also said: "Commenting on the War on Terror, Kanazawa claimed that "there is one resource that our enemies have in abundance but we don’t: hate. Hatred of enemies has always been a proximate emotional motive for war throughout human evolutionary history." He then offers the following thought experiment: "Imagine that, on September 11, 2001, when the Twin Towers came down, the President of the United States was not George W. Bush, but Ann Coulter. What would have happened then? On September 12, President Coulter would have ordered the US military forces to drop 35 nuclear bombs throughout the Middle East, killing all of our actual and potential enemy combatants, and their wives and children. On September 13, the war would have been over and won, without a single American life lost. Yes, we need a woman in the White House,"

          he has also been claiming that attractive people are 26% less likely to have male offspring which has been totally debunked by Andrew Gelman

          NOW YOU KNOW WHAT TYPE WACKY INSANE PEOPLE MAZLOOMYARMASOOD GET THERE INFORMATION FROM HAHAHA..
          ----------

          *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

          Originally posted by Karachi
          like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

          Comment


          • #6
            This is obviously a flawed study that is based tangentially on other studies that have shown that higher IQ is associated with less promiscuity... it just added Atheism and faithfullness for extra kick.

            Stephan Jay Gould categorically proved that IQ studies are not SCIENTIFIC or EMPIRACL since the measured variable is not measurable to begin with. There is no "entity" for intelligence in a human being which you can measure. Most IQ studies are based on how cultured you are. So if Newton were to do the IQ tests of today he would score a messily 100. Don't fool yourself into thinking that this proves that you, Mi6 or Mazloom, are faithful or intelligent.

            Comment

            Working...
            X