Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ghandi's letters to Hitler

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ghandi's letters to Hitler

    Letter to Adolf Hitler, July 23, 1939

    Letter to Adolf Hitler
    As at Wardha, C. P., INDIA,
    July 23, 1939
    DEAR FRIEND,
    Friends have been urging me to write to you for the sake of humanity. But I have resisted their request, because of the feeling that any letter from me would be an impertinence. Something tells me that I must not calculate and that I must make my appeal for whatever it may be worth.
    It is quite clear that you are today the one person in the world who can prevent a war which may reduce humanity to a savage state. Must you pay that price for an object however worthy it may appear to you to be? Will you listen to the appeal of one who has deliberately shunned the method of war not without considerable success? Any way I anticipate your forgiveness, if I have erred in writing to you.
    I remain,
    Your sincere friend,

    M. K. Gandhi
    HERR HITLER,
    BERLIN,
    GERMANY



    Letter to Adolf Hitler, July 23, 1939

    Letter to Adolf Hitler
    As at Wardha,
    December 24, 1940
    DEAR FRIEND,
    That I address you as a friend is no formality. I own no foes. My business in life has been for the past 33 years to enlist the friendship of the whole of humanity by befriending mankind, irrespective of race, colour or creed.
    I hope you will have the time and desire to know how a good portion of humanity who have view living under the influence of that doctrine of universal friendship view your action. We have no doubt about your bravery or devotion to your fatherland, nor do we believe that you are the monster described by your opponents. But your own writings and pronouncements and those of your friends and admirers leave no room for doubt that many of your acts are monstrous and unbecoming of human dignity, especially in the estimation of men like me who believe in universal friendliness. Such are your humiliation of Czechoslovakia, the rape of Poland and the swallowing of Denmark. I am aware that your view of life regards such spoliations as virtuous acts. But we have been taught from childhood to regard them as acts degrading humanity. Hence we cannot possibly wish success to your arms.
    But ours is a unique position. We resist British Imperialism no less than Nazism. If there is a difference, it is in degree. One-fifth of the human race has been brought under the British heel by means that will not bear scrutiny. Our resistance to it does not mean harm to the British people. We seek to convert them, not to defeat them on the battle-field. Ours is an unarmed revolt against the British rule. But whether we convert them or not, we are determined to make their rule impossible by non-violent non-co-operation. It is a method in its nature indefensible. It is based on the knowledge that no spoliator can compass his end without a certain degree of co-operation, willing or compulsory, of the victim. Our rulers may have our land and bodies but not our souls. They can have the former only by complete destruction of every Indian—man, woman and child. That all may not rise to that degree of heroism and that a fair amount of frightfulness can bend the back of revolt is true but the argument would be beside the point. For, if a fair number of men and women be found in India who would be prepared without any ill will against the spoliators to lay down their lives rather than bend the knee to them, they would have shown the way to freedom from the tyranny of violence. I ask you to believe me when I say that you will find an unexpected number of such men and women in India. They have been having that training for the past 20 years.
    We have been trying for the past half a century to throw off the British rule. The movement of independence has been never so strong as now. The most powerful political organization, I mean the Indian National Congress, is trying to achieve this end. We have attained a very fair measure of success through non-violent effort. We were groping for the right means to combat the most organized violence in the world which the British power represents. You have challenged it. It remains to be seen which is the better organized, the German or the British. We know what the British heel means for us and the non-European races of the world. But we would never wish to end the British rule with German aid. We have found in non-violence a force which, if organized, can without doubt match itself against a combination of all the most violent forces in the world. In non-violent technique, as I have said, there is no such thing as defeat. It is all ‘do or die’ without killing or hurting. It can be used practically without money and obviously without the aid of science of destruction which you have brought to such perfection. It is a marvel to me that you do not see that it is nobody’s monopoly. If not the British, some other power will certainly improve upon your method and beat you with your own weapon. You are leaving no legacy to your people of which they would feel proud. They cannot take pride in a recital of cruel deed, however skilfully planned. I, therefore, appeal to you in the name of humanity to stop the war. You will lose nothing by referring all the matters of dispute between you and Great Britain to an international tribunal of your joint choice. If you attain success in the war, it will not prove that you were in the right. It will only prove that your power of destruction was greater. Whereas an award by an impartial tribunal will show as far as it is humanly possible which party was in the right.
    You know that not long ago I made an appeal to every Briton to accept my method of non-violent resistance. I did it because the British know me as a friend though a rebel. I am a stranger to you and your people. I have not the courage to make you the appeal I made to every Briton. Not that it would not apply to you with the same force as to the British. But my present proposal is much simple because much more practical and familiar.
    During this season when the hearts of the peoples of Europe yearn for peace, we have suspended even our own peaceful struggle. Is it too much to ask you to make an effort for peace during a time which may mean nothing to you personally but which must mean much to the millions of Europeans whose dumb cry for peace I hear, for my ears are attended to hearing the dumb millions? I had intended to address a joint appeal to you and Signor Mussolini, whom I had the privilege of meeting when I was in Rome during my visit to England as a delegate to the Round Table Conference. I hope that he will take this as addressed to him also with the necessary changes.
    I am,
    Your sincere friend,

    M. K. GANDHI




    Mahatma Gandhi : Selected Letters

  • #2
    If Ghandi was a PF member, he would have been accused of being a Nazi.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Al Hanif View Post
      If Ghandi was a PF member, he would have been accused of being a Nazi.
      Choice highlighting in the text, which reflects how you may wish the letters to be understood. There is more to it than that if you read on. Also, if Gandhi was a PF member he would be put to scrutiny by someone, I'm sure. Whether he could be called a Nazi (even if the term wasn't loaded) would be something else, however. Gandhi makes a point of opening his letter with Dear Friend and not calling Hitler, the person, a monster, but calling his actions monstrous. This stems from Gandhi's own philosophy on human relations.

      Across the worlds, because many people attempt to preserve their hegemonies or are looking for political redress, they are compelled to make alliances (without sometimes dubious characters). I would recommend that Muslims avoid completely blind admiration in anyone, whether they are writers, movie stars, pop stars or dead fascists.

      The problem with putting Hitler on a pedestal of admiration because of modern day politics around Muslim-Jewish relations is to perhaps ignore how the far-right in Germany use Hitler's ideas of cultural purity to target Muslims today. Everyone needs a bogeyman, Europe's history in particular is littered with examples. Yesterday it was the Slavs/Jews; today it is the Muslims. I doubt that Hitler would have discriminated the difference in the long term.

      Comment


      • #4
        Where's Hitler's reply?
        ----------

        *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

        Originally posted by Karachi
        like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Manzareh View Post
          Where's Hitler's reply?
          Too busy taking over the world.

          Comment


          • #6
            ^ nah he definitely must have replied, but they don't want people to read his side of the story.
            ----------

            *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

            Originally posted by Karachi
            like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

            Comment

            Working...
            X