Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fundamental Theorems of Integration

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fundamental Theorems of Integration

    We know there are three ways to find integrals (i) geometric (2) analytic (3) applying anti-differentiation that derives from the Fundamental Theorems of Integration (there are two theorems-Newton, Leibniz developed independently : )? Do you know, what is the basic concept of these theorems?
    Last edited by Toramana; 07-13-2012, 09:56 PM.

  • #2
    This is also called Fundamental Theorem of Calculus ...it proves that for continuous functions, the anti derivative exists.
    [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

    2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

    Comment


    • #3
      I thought this was about the integration of people.

      Toramana, being the integrated Canadian he is, could perhaps shed some light on that too, for us ignorant Wahhabi Muslims.
      Dark Vader Ghost King El Malo Camello Papa

      Pro-Black is Pro-Righteous!

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Toramana View Post
        We know there are three ways to find integrals (i) geometric (2) analytic (3) applying anti-differentiation that derives from the Fundamental Theorems of Integration (there are two theorems-Newton, Leibniz developed independently : )? Do you know, what is the basic concept of these theorems?
        newtons method is used when there is no straightforward method of solution so the next best alternative is a numerical solution.

        example the equation :

        x^4 + x^3 -1=0

        newtons method teaches us to first find a value say x=x(0) which is close enough the to the solution ( you can do this by drawing a rough graph) and then you basically carry out a step by step kind of process until the desired accuracy is obtained using the formula:

        x(n+1)=x(n) - f(x(n))/f'(x(n)) for n=0,1,2,3....
        Ka Makh De Rana Hear Sho No Jehan Ba Rana Hear She
        Ka Nom De Rana Hear Sho No Khpal Zan Ba Rana Her She[

        Comment


        • #5
          the other i will touch on inabit just got to eat aha
          Ka Makh De Rana Hear Sho No Jehan Ba Rana Hear She
          Ka Nom De Rana Hear Sho No Khpal Zan Ba Rana Her She[

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
            This is also called Fundamental Theorem of Calculus ...it proves that for continuous functions, the anti derivative exists.
            Good...More specifically, proves that the (first) derivative of a function representing area under a curve (i.e., Area function e.g. A(x)) is the function (e.g. f(x) ) bounding the area ---and that, the anti-derivative of f(x) then is the integral over a closed interval (e.g., [a,b]) giving the area function. Remarkable discovery by Newton and Leibniz.
            Last edited by Toramana; 07-14-2012, 10:00 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by sahil112 View Post
              newtons method is used when there is no straightforward method of solution so the next best alternative is a numerical solution.

              example the equation :

              x^4 + x^3 -1=0

              newtons method teaches us to first find a value say x=x(0) which is close enough the to the solution ( you can do this by drawing a rough graph) and then you basically carry out a step by step kind of process until the desired accuracy is obtained using the formula:

              x(n+1)=x(n) - f(x(n))/f'(x(n)) for n=0,1,2,3....
              Newton's is a numerical method I guess not very efficient and general (there are other methods e.g., Simpson's rule, Trapzoid rule, etc.). The anti-derivative method is the most efficient.
              Last edited by Toramana; 07-14-2012, 09:59 PM.

              Comment


              • #8
                actually, I would give credit for the development of Integration to Ibn Haytham.
                [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Toramana, it seems you're concentrating on a great deal of early undergraduate level mathematics, which is fine. Any reason for that though?
                  [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                  2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
                    Toramana, it seems you're concentrating on a great deal of early undergraduate level mathematics, which is fine. Any reason for that though?
                    Actually, I learn or re-learn mathematics on the fly as I need it for my purpose---Have to recall some early calculus learning to grasp some relatively advanced topics more fully---am doing it for fun as well.

                    I was good at maths as for as "formula mathematics" as they teach it back home is concerned but didn't know the theory at its basis very well---Can't go even a single step ahead until grasping the basic concept.
                    Last edited by Toramana; 07-14-2012, 10:13 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      that's very true, fair enough. Need any help let me know, I used to be a tutor.
                      [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                      2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
                        that's very true, fair enough. Need any help let me know, I used to be a tutor.
                        Thanks---sure if needed help.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X