Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pakistan’s debt situation not a pretty picture

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pakistan’s debt situation not a pretty picture

    Banu Mazdigar and other Pakis. Can you share your views on the article.



    KARACHI: Renowned economist and former finance minister recently rang a warning bell on Pakistan’s external debt position.

    According to his estimates, external debt would reach a whopping $90 billion in the next four years and the country would need $20 billion a year just to meet its external financing requirements. Not only would this adversely impact macroeconomic sustainability, but would have a negative impact on growth as well.

    Pakistan’s external debt set to grow to whopping $90b


    Economists have argued that reasonable levels of external debt that help finance productive investment may enhance growth but beyond that, additional levels of indebtedness may cause to reduce it.

    Countries have faced severe external debt crises and there have been instances of sovereign debt defaults since 1800. More recently, during the 1980s several countries faced high debt levels and repayments became impossible.

    In a seminal paper by Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff, the authors have attempted to count all the sovereign defaults from 1800 to early 2000s. They count more than 250 instances of sovereign defaults in 200 years — an average of more than one a year.

    Various factors have been attributed to this phenomenon. Reversal of global capital flows, weak revenues and rising interest rates are some of the few reasons which can potentially cause this.

    Pakistan’s external debt situation

    Currently as of September 2015, Pakistan’s external debt stands at $66.5 billion.

    External debt is primarily comprised of public debt (government debt, debt from IMF and foreign exchange liabilities), public sector enterprises (PSEs), banks, private sector debt and debt liabilities to direct investors.

    Of this total external debt, nearly 84% is public debt. This debt is primarily long term in nature acquired from various multilateral organisations.

    International Debt Statistics compiled by the World Bank has claimed that for 2014 almost 55% of external debt in the country is denominated in US dollars.

    Moreover, the interest rate for all creditors is 4.3% with a maturity of 17 years. Grant element of this debt has been significantly reduced and stands at 37% which went as high as 66% in 2011.

    Regionally, India has a much larger external debt position amounting to $482.9 billion.

    Although Pakistan’s external debt is much smaller in magnitude compared to its neighbour, it has been consistently increasing.

    It is significant to note that in a period of nine years from June 2006 to June 2015, the increase in external debt has been 75%.

    Under the carpet? Govt applies creativity to measure debt pile

    With limited increase in our export base and rising external debt stocks, the ratio of external debt to exports has been creeping up since 2012 and has reached 200% in 2014. Debt servicing to exports has also been rising over the years and stands at 19%in 2014.

    Debt sustainability is key

    Debt sustainability is a critical issue and one that is key to overall macroeconomic stability.

    The joint World Bank-International Monetary Fund Debt sustainability framework was introduced in 2005 and is periodically reviewed. It was conducted most recently in 2012 with the next review being scheduled for 2016.

    This framework for debt sustainability analysis has three broad policy objectives. One is to assess the current debt situation, its maturity structure, whether it has fixed or floating rates and by whom it is held.

    Secondly, to identify vulnerabilities in the debt structure so that policy advice can be introduced before payment difficulties arise and lastly to examine the impact of alternative debt stabilising paths.

    Disclosure on debt to all policymakers is key to making decisions that are critical for macroeconomic stability. Recently, the governor of the central bank of the country also hinted on this point when he said that the government should clarify regarding the composition of the much touted investment of China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) in terms of how much is equity and what proportion is debt.

    Importance should be paid not on the magnitude but rather the efficiency of investment. Furthermore, our policymakers should pay serious attention towards debt sustainability before it balloons itself to be unmanageable. Pakistan’s debt to exports ratio of 200% is quite high.

    IMF studies have pointed out that halving debt to exports ratio from about 200% of exports to about 100% would boost per capita growth by about 0.5-1%.

    Lesser developing countries like Pakistan with weak institutions and policy structures face greater repayment issues and, therefore should pay great emphasis on the implementation of debt sustainability frameworks to avoid any future crises.

    The writer is an economist and ex-central banker

    Published in The Express Tribune, December 28th, 2015.

    Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

  • #2
    I think Pakistan is generally guaranteed survival through bailouts, intervention through powerful friends that will never allow it to collapse, thus the Pakistanis are reckless and keep on repeating this stuff. The friends are:

    - The USA which controls the IMF and World Bank.
    - China
    - Saudi
    - and now Turkey too.
    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    Shukran ya Masr!!!

    Thanks to Egypt for supporting Bangladesh against Pakistani harassment and support for terrorists and war criminals!!

    Comment


    • #3
      Survival? Implications I would say. IMF and U.S. financing comes with strings-attached and the structural adjustment policies (SSPs) is likely to have its toll on the Pakistani economy and government spending with adverse effect on education, health and poverty etc. Well, blame the debt. More bailouts would mean more leverage. Pakistan might be cautious, the likes of Christine Fair is already advocating that the U.S. leaves it to its own devise and let fail.

      China has no money for free to give, and the previous time when Pakistan was about to default in 2008, it refused to bail-out it out. IMF was the last resort as it is now. There is a lot of false hype around China coming and sharing the weal and woe no matter what.

      Saudi, they already are giving Pakistan free oil worth $2 billion. Turkey, well... I doubt it.

      Pakistan might want to avoid a debt over-hang threshold where its economy will spiral down. There is already a high risk of the debt becoming deleterious as the government will cut on spending overall (education, health, infrastructure etc.) to service the debt, while the prospect of higher taxation etc. will dissuade private investment. This could even mean economic stagnation. I would be seriously worried if Pakistan asks for another bail-out.

      But, we are outsiders and it would be interesting to hear from Pakistani members.

      Comment


      • #4
        Pakistan is considered one of the most corrupt countries with weak institutions, and on the competitiveness ranking of 144 economies it is 126th. Bad signs. Everything you hear about is CPEC, CPEC and CPEC.. which is encouraging but will not impact the Pakistani economy in a fundamental way it is ought to.

        Comment


        • #5
          except for bangladesh debt situation in south asia is almost similar.

          Our export is stagnant and import is increasing though tax revenue growth rate is 16% for the last 2 years and almost 20% this year.

          cant write in enough detail as i am slightly busy
          "[B][SIZE="3"]Seer Speen Wazeer[/SIZE][/B]"

          Comment


          • #6
            I'm more worried about hardly any increase in exports! Pakistan always pays his debt.
            Best post in PF history
            [I]
            ''Today the ideology of Pakistaniat within Pakistanis is so strong that even if world war 3 is fought within Pakistan boundries,Pakistan will survive.'' [/I]Da Bannu Mazdigar

            Comment


            • #7
              Ok for those that don't like Pakistan/Pakistanis .. Say you get your way and get to abolish it; what would you do to the country? What happens to it, does it/people join India? Join Afghanistan? Or does everybody stand in line and get slaughtered one at a time. What's your solution to a future map of the world without a 'Pakistan' that you people romantisise about. Serious answers are appreciated.
              ----------

              *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

              Originally posted by Karachi
              like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

              Comment


              • #8
                Mr Manzarah,

                You question is completely unrelated to the topic. The topic is clear and has nothing to do with liking or disliking Pakistan/Pakistanis (what makes you think it is?) but discussing the debt issue in Pakistan. My intent for opening the thread is for educational purpose. You are welcome to take part in the discussion and then draw any wild conclusions if you may.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by tilla_jogian View Post
                  I'm more worried about hardly any increase in exports! Pakistan always pays his debt.
                  Is that in volume or value? But the volume of the debt is high now and is negatively effecting the Pakistan economy.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by ComradePashtun View Post
                    Is that in volume or value? But the volume of the debt is high now and is negatively effecting the Pakistan economy.
                    Value in $ have not increased much since 2-3 years now. Mostly because of energy crisis and loadshedding. But this will change in 2 years. I'm not aware of how debt is increasing, if it's because of infrastructure projects then I don't know why should Pakis worry about it.
                    Best post in PF history
                    [I]
                    ''Today the ideology of Pakistaniat within Pakistanis is so strong that even if world war 3 is fought within Pakistan boundries,Pakistan will survive.'' [/I]Da Bannu Mazdigar

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Manzareh View Post
                      Ok for those that don't like Pakistan/Pakistanis .. Say you get your way and get to abolish it; what would you do to the country? What happens to it, does it/people join India? Join Afghanistan? Or does everybody stand in line and get slaughtered one at a time. What's your solution to a future map of the world without a 'Pakistan' that you people romantisise about. Serious answers are appreciated.
                      Do you consider yourself Pakistani? if so why?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Manzareh View Post
                        Ok for those that don't like Pakistan/Pakistanis .. Say you get your way and get to abolish it; what would you do to the country? What happens to it, does it/people join India? Join Afghanistan? Or does everybody stand in line and get slaughtered one at a time. What's your solution to a future map of the world without a 'Pakistan' that you people romantisise about. Serious answers are appreciated.
                        I do like Pakistanis and Pakistan, I just don't like its ruling elite who have exploited the people of Pakistan and its neighbours in the name of Islam etc.

                        My solution would be to creat a confideration of pakistan, afghanistan and tajikistan and but abolishing the names of all these three countries and creating smaller states within this confieration consisting of Pashtunistan for pashtun areas, khurasan for farsiwans, punjab for punjabis, sindh for sindhis, balochistan for balochis, etc. Loy Afghanistan or the Pakistan dreams of creating the Mughal empire and ghazwa e hind must be abolished. Each of these states will have their own national language, currency, leaders etc but they will be tied to a sort of union like the European union. Landlocked states such as punjab and pashtunistan must be granted access to the sea by balochistan and Sindh as part of being in the union, there must be visa free travel, locals should have the first right to property ownership but outsiders from the confideration can also settle in new areas providd they respect and accept the local culture, law etc. This way local languages and cultures will be preserved and not dominated by Urdu, Pashto, Farsi etc. Everyone will feels like they belong to the state as everything will be in their native language and they won't feel forced being part of an unhappy union. They can leave the union at any time except during war.

                        Kashmir must be recognised as an independent nation by both India and the confideration.

                        The Turkic nations in the north such as turkmenisatan, uzbekistan etc can create their own confieration and call it something else.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Shapur View Post
                          I do like Pakistanis and Pakistan, I just don't like its ruling elite who have exploited the people of Pakistan and its neighbours in the name of Islam etc.

                          My solution would be to creat a confideration of pakistan, afghanistan and tajikistan and but abolishing the names of all these three countries and creating smaller states within this confieration consisting of Pashtunistan for pashtun areas, khurasan for farsiwans, punjab for punjabis, sindh for sindhis, balochistan for balochis, etc. Loy Afghanistan or the Pakistan dreams of creating the Mughal empire and ghazwa e hind must be abolished. Each of these states will have their own national language, currency, leaders etc but they will be tied to a sort of union like the European union. Landlocked states such as punjab and pashtunistan must be granted access to the sea by balochistan and Sindh as part of being in the union, there must be visa free travel, locals should have the first right to property ownership but outsiders from the confideration can also settle in new areas providd they respect and accept the local culture, law etc. This way local languages and cultures will be preserved and not dominated by Urdu, Pashto, Farsi etc. Everyone will feels like they belong to the state as everything will be in their native language and they won't feel forced being part of an unhappy union. They can leave the union at any time except during war.

                          Kashmir must be recognised as an independent nation by both India and the confideration.

                          The Turkic nations in the north such as turkmenisatan, uzbekistan etc can create their own confieration and call it something else.
                          Thanks but no thanks. Only solution is to seal the border and call it a day. Afghani refugees to go back and from then on afghanis will need visa to cross the border.

                          Afghanis are delusional, neither Pakistan nor Tajikistan want any kind of union with Afghanis. In fact Tajikistan and Pakistan have similar interests when it comes to protecting borders from unwanted guests.
                          Best post in PF history
                          [I]
                          ''Today the ideology of Pakistaniat within Pakistanis is so strong that even if world war 3 is fought within Pakistan boundries,Pakistan will survive.'' [/I]Da Bannu Mazdigar

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X