Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pashtun leaders threaten break up of Pakistan

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by khushal View Post
    why dont they use pakistani workers and engineers.
    When China invest somewhere main engineers are always Chinese. Then engineers below them and normal workers are Pakistanis. In Balochistan not even workers from other Pakistani provinces are safe, so that route being more secure is bs. First Pak will have to take care of BLA if they want route going right through Balochistan.
    Best post in PF history
    [I]
    ''Today the ideology of Pakistaniat within Pakistanis is so strong that even if world war 3 is fought within Pakistan boundries,Pakistan will survive.'' [/I]Da Bannu Mazdigar

    Comment


    • #17
      Mr. Atozai is a huge Pakistani puppet and slave to the banana republic. All of this guys' tweets are humorous.
      "Revenge is a dish best served cold".

      -Old Pashtun proverb




      "My Pashtun Pride i will not hide!"

      Comment


      • #18


        From: https://www.facebook.com/justiceforp...type=1&theater
        * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

        Shukran ya Masr!!!

        Thanks to Egypt for supporting Bangladesh against Pakistani harassment and support for terrorists and war criminals!!

        Comment


        • #19
          How the "Corridor of Opportunity" turned into the "Corridor of Controversy"


          The CPEC is a golden opportunity for the Federal Government to reduce the mistrust of the center found among Pashtuns, Balochs and Sindhis, writes Sulaiman Mandanr

          May 04, 2015, 11:23 pm





          Back in 2013 when, for the first time, the parliament was told that Pakistan and China had plans to sign a deal for improving trade relations between the two countries and bringing the Karachi and Gwadar ports into further use, it had created the hope that Pakistan's economic conditions would improve. The Chinese President’s visit to the country last month changed that hope into reality; Chinese investment in Pakistan has, without a doubt, presented Pakistan as an investment opportunity to the world, which is otherwise known for its terrorist networks. While Pakistan is still busy tackling terrorism, this is a lifeline for its economy. China being the major export and import partner of Pakistan, both the countries have a lot to win from the proposed plan: the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. Signed between National Development Reform Commission of China and Planning Commission of Pakistan, the CPEC’s main objective was to focus on connecting the western region of China with Pakistan and the rest of the world through Pakistani ports. Its focus is on developing the “research framework” for establishing communication links including roads, railways, fiber optic cable, oil and gas pipelines linking Gwadar with western China. The plan is indeed an opportunity for improvement for both the countries, especially for Pakistan’s war- and terrorism-hit economy. The sectors identified for development were road, rail, energy and industries.

          Now, where did things go wrong? Why did this corridor of opportunity turn into a controversy? Let me tell you what happened. While the main objective of the CPEC was to connect the western region of China with Pakistan’s port of Gwadar, the main objective of Pakistan’s Federal Government seems to be something else. Trying to turn the waters muddy, the Minister for Planning and Development, Ahsan Iqbal continues to deny any change in route; in the same breath, he also says that an interim arrangement is being planned by using existing infrastructure for “short term” as to make the corridor and port functional. In his recent tweet he says “ Gawadar, Turbat, Panjgur, Besima, Kalat, Mastung, Quetta, Qila Saifullah, Zhob, DI Khan, Bannu, Kohat, Peshawar route included in CPEC” while Planning Commission Pakistan tweets a map of CPEC route calling it the corridor of opportunity that passes through Lahore. A few weeks earlier the NHA published the invitation for pre-qualification for Lahore-Abdul Hakeem Section which is 235 kilometers long. The notice reads “the motorway forms part of trade corridor linking ports of Karachi and Gwadar with China and Central Asian states.” And the estimated cost for the project is set at 1.30 billion dollars for the 230 km section. Whereas, the total funds allocated to roads in the CPEC is 5.9 billion dollars. The summary of the Transport Sector Report by Ministry of Transport China reads that “The spatial scope of the Plan is the reversed-Y-shaped belt consisting of 6 major connection points, i.e. Kashgar, Islamabad, Lahore, Sukkur, Karachi and Gwadar based on regional transport characteristics as agreed by China and Pakistan.” Pakistan’s Ministry of Communications comments on the documents and agrees with above, adding that “Gwadar via Khuzdar may be added as one of the major connection points for actualization of reversed-Y-shaped corridor/ belt”. It further adds that “the planned period of the Plan is 2014-2030, with the Short-term of 2014-2020 (with priorities projects before 2018), medium and long term of 2021-2030 as well as long-term prospect after 2030”. The priority projects include Thakot-Mansehra, Mansehra-Havelian, Havelian-Harpur, Harpur-Islamabad (connecting to M1) and Multan-Sukkur whereas Faisalabad-Multan and Lahore-Multan(Khanewal) is part of the short term plan. Contrary to what Ahsan Iqbal claims in his tweet, it is important to note that nowhere in this plan up to 2030 includes the cities of Peshawar, Kohat, Bannu, DI Khan, Zhob, Qila Saifullah, Quetta, Mastung or Kalat. When confronted by nationalist parties, Ahsan Iqbal calls them paid US Agents, an "insult" commonly practiced in Pakistan for discrediting one's opponent’s views.

          Speaking in the Parliament, Ahsan Iqbal was showing maps from New York Times, and Wall Street Journal as a proof that no change had taken place in the route. One can’t quite understand why the Minister wasn’t using official documents from the Planning Commission to prove that the route remains unaltered.

          The NHA Chairman, while briefing the Senate Standing Committee on Communications, couldn’t clarify the reason behind the inclusion of the interim/short term plan. However, some experts explain that the already available infrastructure, security and population is the reason behind the interim arrangement.

          While public pressure mounts asking for transparency on the project, major opposition political parties including PPP, ANP, PTI, MQM, QWP and JUI-F are also raising their concerns. Known for its support in the Pashtun populated provinces of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Baluchistan, who are the most affected by the change in route, the Awami National Party has taken a leading role on the issue. It convened an All Parties Conference in February and plans to hold another one in Baluchistan this month. Asfandyar Wali Khan vows to reject any change in the route and warns that it will turn into another Kalabagh Dam for Pakistan. A large public gathering was held in Quetta under ANP last week rejecting any change in the route.

          With such pressure building in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Baluchistan, where Baloch nationalists are actively fighting against Pakistan’s Army, the manner in which the Federal Government is dealing with this issue will only make matters worse. Pashtuns, Balochs and Sindhis are already struggling for their rights in Pakistan and hold a non-favorable opinion of the PML-N, generally viewing it as a Punjab-based party looking after the interests of Punjabis alone. It is crucial for the federal government to address this trust deficit. The CPEC was a golden opportunity, but it has unfortunately turned into a controversy now - but it still might not be too late.

          When the government claims that no changes have been made in the route, all they have to do is make the documents public. A little transparency will do - the people need a reason to trust the Federal Government.

          Back in 2013 when, for the first time, the parliament was told that Pakistan and China had plans to sign a deal for improving trade relations between the two




          *Traditionally in Pakistan any Pakistani citizen who questions the army or the Punjabi-dominated establishment is automatically branded a "traitor", rather than a citizen who has grievances which must be addressed.

          No doubt Pakistani/Punjabi nationalists will soon start calling all those who want roads for the neglected western part of Pakistan "traitors" and "enemies of Pakistan", simply because they want a road in their part of the country.
          * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

          Shukran ya Masr!!!

          Thanks to Egypt for supporting Bangladesh against Pakistani harassment and support for terrorists and war criminals!!

          Comment


          • #20
            They just want some money, give em a couple of rupees and theyll be fine.

            Comment


            • #21
              Asfandyar refuses to attend briefings on CPEC

              A CORRESPONDENT — UPDATED ABOUT 15 HOURS AGO





              CHARSADDA: The Awami National Party central president Asfandyar Wali Khan has reiterated that he will not attend any government briefing until his party’s reservations regarding the western route of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) were redressed.

              Addressing a party workers convention at Gulabad here on Friday, the ANP chief demanded that all announcements, including establishment of industrial estates in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan, made during the all parties conference, should be honoured in letter and spirit.

              ANP provincial general secretary Sardar Hussain Babak, former MPA Shakil Bashir Khan Umarzai and others were also present on the occasion.

              It merits a mention here that former senator Afrasiab Khattak on behalf of ANP chief Asfandyar Wali has sent a letter to Federal Minister for Planning and Development Ahsan Iqbal refusing to participate in any briefing on the CPEC as requested by the federal government.

              The ANP sent the letter in response to a message by the federal minister on behalf of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to Asfandyar Wali offering a fresh briefing on CPEC to an ANP delegation and an invitation for a visit to the project area to check the on-ground progress.

              Asfandyar Khan alleged that recent allocations, announcements and inaugurations under the project showed that the eastern route of the CPEC continued to be the federal government’s priority while western route had no worth in the eyes of the ruling PML-N.






              Asfandyar Wali.

              The CPEC route between Pakistan and China has become such a big issue for Pakhtuns because if it does not go through Pashtun areas as originally planned, it is a sign that they have no share in Pakistan's future prosperity that they are second-class citizens in a Punjabi dominated federation.



              I personally do not believe the federation of Pakistan will continue to stay intact in its current form, the federation itself saw the majority of its people leave in 1971. It's territorial integrity is at stake if it does not fulfill the aspirations of its component nations as we have seen in the past in "east Pakistan".
              * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

              Shukran ya Masr!!!

              Thanks to Egypt for supporting Bangladesh against Pakistani harassment and support for terrorists and war criminals!!

              Comment


              • #22


                Pakhtuns in London protest outside the Pakistani regime high commission there over the CPEC crisis.
                * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

                Shukran ya Masr!!!

                Thanks to Egypt for supporting Bangladesh against Pakistani harassment and support for terrorists and war criminals!!

                Comment


                • #23


                  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

                  Shukran ya Masr!!!

                  Thanks to Egypt for supporting Bangladesh against Pakistani harassment and support for terrorists and war criminals!!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Bengal_Tiger View Post


                    We are so scared you Bonglo turd. This CPEC will have a positive effect on KPK whether the route runs through it or not.

                    How about you ask us Southern Punjabis about any economical up-liftment Bongoli?

                    These Lahoris and Pashtuns are getting more than us. We don't get **** out here in Southern Punjab. Why don't you cry and make threads about us, you piece of agenda driven ****?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X