Originally posted by Waziristan
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Tale of gay woman forced to marry to protect 'honour'
Collapse
X
-
Roadrunner,
What is your opinion regarding homosexuals? You seem like someone who always has something interesting to say, I want to hear you out.Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.
A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai
For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."
The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!
-Ferishta, 1560–1620
Comment
-
What i dont get with the anti gay ppl and what they themselves cant explain is why wld any1 want 2 choose being gay ... being hated and being an outcast in society... as for their argument that this is the product of western media... ahem ahem ... there have been gay ppl throughout history in all civilisationsFrater aliquis in fide nec fratrem humanitatis

Comment
-
Anything specific? In religion, Homosexuality is of course seen as a sin in Islam (and other religions). There doesn't appear to be any punishment for it in Islam, but it is a sin to commit homosexual acts. People who commit homosexual acts do fall into different categories. Some are not really gay, but just think they are (a phase if you like). Some are genuine gays. These are the people who I think have been gay all their lives.Originally posted by Admin Khan View PostRoadrunner,
What is your opinion regarding homosexuals? You seem like someone who always has something interesting to say, I want to hear you out.
For gays to be a problem, they would need to be out harrassing straight men or women. If all they do is have relationships with other gays in their own homes, there's really not a problem at all. They can do what they like. Sometimes they do come onto straight men, but it's occasionally in my experience.Last edited by Guest; 11-17-2010, 08:58 PM.
Comment
-
I think a great way to start this dialogue would be are you a Muslim yourself? If yes, what do you think of homosexuals while being a Muslim? Do you think people choose homosexuality with their free will or they are just 'born into it'?
Further more, I think we should note that homosexuality has been present before the inception of many religions.Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.
A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai
For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."
The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!
-Ferishta, 1560–1620
Comment
-
Certainly. I consider myself to be one, others do not. It's much like some people consider me to be of one ethnic group, others say I'm not. What others think though would be irrelevant.Originally posted by Admin Khan View PostI think a great way to start this dialogue would be are you a Muslim yourself?
I honestly don't think about them. If I'm face to face with one and they say they're homosexual I still couldn't care. I've found people saying to me that they are homosexual (they might not be) in order to see my reaction. It doesnt bother me, not because I'm trying to hide something, but because i honestly don't find homosexuals exciting, special, twisted, or worth reacting to differently. It's their life and it doesn't affect mine.If yes, what do you think of homosexuals while being a Muslim?
Both I would say.Do you think people choose homosexuality with their free will or they are just 'born into it'?
I would say this is true.Further more, I think we should note that homosexuality has been present before the inception of many religions.
Comment
-
Interesting, so since you consider yourself to be a Muslim, do you consider yourself to be a 'practicing Muslim'? What I mean by that is, If the Quran says " posting on PashtunForums is a sin" Wouldn't you as a Muslim, adhere to that law? Similarly, if the Quran says homosexuality is a sin, wouldn't the same rules apply? I have noticed many Muslims who are overly exuberant when it comes to defending homosexuality, but my question is, doesn't that contradict what your religion preaches?Originally posted by roadrunner View PostCertainly. I consider myself to be one, others do not. It's much like some people consider me to be of one ethnic group, others say I'm not. What others think though would be irrelevant.
To be more concise, would you agree that homosexuality is a sin? There is a difference between caring and recognizing a sin. I can drink alcohol and admit its a sin, but still say "I don't care".Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.
A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai
For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."
The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!
-Ferishta, 1560–1620
Comment
-
It's a sin if I personally did it. Since I'm not the one being homosexual I am not sinning. If others want to sin, it's up to them. I do not care. If the Quran says posting on pashtunforums is a sin, then I might not do it. But this isn't a like comparison. A like comparison would be if the Quran says posting on pashtunforums is a sin except for roadrunner. In which case it's not a sin for me, just as it's not a sin for me to not care what a homosexual does or others that post on pashtunforums.Originally posted by Admin Khan View PostInteresting, so since you consider yourself to be a Muslim, do you consider yourself to be a 'practicing Muslim'? What I mean by that is, If the Quran says " posting on PashtunForums is a sin" Wouldn't you as a Muslim, adhere to that law? Similarly, if the Quran says homosexuality is a sin, wouldn't the same rules apply? I have noticed many Muslims who are overly exuberant when it comes to defending homosexuality, but my question is, doesn't that contradict what your religion preaches?
To be more concise, would you agree that homosexuality is a sin? There is a difference between caring and recognizing a sin. I can drink alcohol and admit its a sin, but still say "I don't care".
Comment
-
If Islam frowns and considers it a sin, wouldn't it be logical to conclude that defending,praising or embracing it transgresses Islamic moral values? Like I said, when someone claims they are a Muslim, there are certain responsibilities that come along with it. Would you agree? If not, I look forward to your refutation. Lets suppose I am a homosexual, me and you might not have 'beef' simply because I am a homosexual, which is fine, but would agree that I have deviated from basic Islam? I am also interested in discussing homosexuality, I think we should make a distinction within it. How do you differentiate between being born in homosexuality and embracing it with your free will? Which one of these concepts sounds more plausible?Originally posted by roadrunner View PostIt's a sin if I personally did it. Since I'm not the one being homosexual I am not sinning. If others want to sin, it's up to them. I do not care. If the Quran says posting on pashtunforums is a sin, then I might not do it. But this isn't a like comparison. A like comparison would be if the Quran says posting on pashtunforums is a sin except for roadrunner. In which case it's not a sin for me, just as it's not a sin for me to not care what a homosexual does or others that post on pashtunforums.Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.
A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai
For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."
The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!
-Ferishta, 1560–1620
Comment
-
As Islam considers homosexuality a sin, then obviously if I were to embrace homosexuality and become gay, then I would be sinning. Since I am not saying I personally want to become gay, then I am not sinning. So I am not embracing homosexuality.Originally posted by Admin Khan View PostIf Islam frowns and considers it a sin, wouldn't it be logical to conclude that defending,praising or embracing it transgresses Islamic moral values?
If I were to praise homosexuality, then I would still not be sinning because I need to physically be homosexual in order to transgress. But I'm not even praising homosexuality. I simply do not care about it, or gays that do it.
If I were to "defend" homosexuality by saying homosexuals should be allowed to do what they want in their own space, it would not be me that is sinning. The freedom to sin is up to the homosexual. So I'm personally not transgressing anything. What would be your claim that I would be transgressing something be based on?
Sinning occurs whether you are a Muslim or not. If you do sin, you can still be a Muslim.Like I said, when someone claims they are a Muslim, there are certain responsibilities that come along with it. Would you agree? If not, I look forward to your refutation.
You would be sinning if you were committing homosexual acts according to Islam.Lets suppose I am a homosexual, me and you might not have 'beef' simply because I am a homosexual, which is fine, but would agree that I have deviated from basic Islam?
Both are plausible and it's likely both occur.I am also interested in discussing homosexuality, I think we should make a distinction within it. How do you differentiate between being born in homosexuality and embracing it with your free will? Which one of these concepts sounds more plausible?
Comment
-
That is precisely the point. If someone claims they are Muslim, accepting homosexuality is a 'no,no'!Originally posted by roadrunner View PostAs Islam considers homosexuality a sin, then obviously if I were to embrace homosexuality and become gay, then I would be sinning.
Great, now if I were to embrace homosexuality, I would not be in compliance with Islamic regulations right?Since I am not saying I personally want to become gay, then I am not sinning. So I am not embracing homosexuality.
But isn't part of being a Muslim, offering wisdom and da'waah to those who are misled or perhaps confused? Isn't it your job, as a Muslim, to preach a homosexual man the truth? Shouldn't you call him, and have a long chat with him at starbucks* on how he has deviated from Islam?If I were to praise homosexuality, then I would still not be sinning because I need to physically be homosexual in order to transgress. But I'm not even praising homosexuality. I simply do not care about it, or gays that do it.
*Any place of your personal preference.
You are right in a sense that, a homosexual can do what he wants in his space, but isn't it wrong for a Muslim to say its okay to be a homosexual? Doesn't that go against basic Islamic values? Isn't it clear that it transgresses Islamic morality?If I were to "defend" homosexuality by saying homosexuals should be allowed to do what they want in their own space, it would not be me that is sinning.
My claim is as follows, If one claims to be a Muslim, he can't sit down and say its okay to be a homosexual. That is a basic contradiction with his Islamic beliefs. Have in mind, we are discussing what we are within the realms of Islam only.The freedom to sin is up to the homosexual. So I'm personally not transgressing anything. What would be your claim that I would be transgressing something be based on?
We sin on a daily basis, but not acknowledging the sin, or refuting the sin is where the problem arises. I can be intoxicated 24 hours a day and admit what I am doing is wrong, and many people might leave me alone. However, If I were to argue that It's okay to be drunk in Islam, isn't that where the essential problem arises?Sinning occurs whether you are a Muslim or not. If you do sin, you can still be a Muslim.
Would I be sinning if I acknowledge that there is nothing wrong with homosexuality?You would be sinning if you were committing homosexual acts according to Islam.
The above rebuttal is vague, I would appreciate it if you could further elaborate brother. If one is born into it, doesn't that invalidate the Islamic principle that homosexuality is wrong? If God has made them homosexuals, how can Islam claim its wrong?Both are plausible and it's likely both occur.Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.
A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai
For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."
The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!
-Ferishta, 1560–1620
Comment
-
If one accepted it, one would be sinning, IslamicallyOriginally posted by Admin Khan View PostThat is precisely the point. If someone claims they are Muslim, accepting homosexuality is a 'no,no'!
You would be sinning, Islamically.Great, now if I were to embrace homosexuality, I would not be in compliance with Islamic regulations right?
Possibly to those who are willing to listen. But in order for this to work, you would first need to get them to accept Islam (or any religion), and then you can point out that you are sinning. To be honest I wouldn't do anything. People can lead their life how they want and I really couldn't care.But isn't part of being a Muslim, offering wisdom and da'waah to those who are misled or perhaps confused? Isn't it your job, as a Muslim, to preach a homosexual man the truth? Shouldn't you call him, and have a long chat with him at starbucks* on how he have deviated from Islam?
*Any place of your preference
But that's not what I'm saying. I said it's a sin, but I don't care if others want to sin, that would be their choice. It would be their freedom of religion if you like.You are right in a sense that, a homosexual can do what he wants in his space, but isn't it wrong for a Muslim to say its okay to be a homosexual?Doesn't that go against basic Islamic values, doesn't that transgress Islamic morality?
Sure, I agree. It's a sin to be a homosexual, but i don't care if another person is homosexual since it is their sin.My claim is as follows, If one claims to be a Muslim, he can't sit down and say its okay to be a homosexual. That is a basic contradiction with his Islamic beliefs. Have in mind, we are discussing what we are within the realms of Islam only.
You're moving the argument slightly. I said it was a sin in Islam.We sin on a daily basis, but not acknowleding the sin, or refuting the sin is where the problem arises.
I can be intoxicated 24 hours a day and admit what I am doing is wrong, and many would leave me alone. However, If I were to argue that It's okay to be drunk in Islam, isn't that where the essential problem arises?
Would I be sinning if I acknowledge that there is nothing wrong with homosexuality?
Some people are born gay, some just want to try it out or get on better with men than women.The above rebuttal is vague, I would appreciate it if you could further elaborate brother.
Comment
-
Dear Roadrunner,
Before I respond, I had also added some extra text to my last paragraph to which you haven't yet responded to.
It was, "If one is born into it, doesn't that invalidate the Islamic principle that homosexuality is wrong? If God has made them homosexuals, how can Islam claim its wrong?"Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.
A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai
For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."
The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!
-Ferishta, 1560–1620
Comment
-
Theoretically it could occur after conception, but before birth. So they might not have been made homosexuals by God, if you believe in God, but during pregnancy.Originally posted by Admin Khan View PostDear Roadrunner,
Before I respond, I had also added some extra text to my last paragraph to which you haven't yet responded to.
It was, "If one is born into it, doesn't that invalidate the Islamic principle that homosexuality is wrong? If God has made them homosexuals, how can Islam claim its wrong?"
Comment
-
Thank you for your time roadrunner. I know understand your stance. I appreciate the discussion, and I have definitely learned from you, which is the whole purpose of this platform.Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.
A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai
For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."
The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!
-Ferishta, 1560–1620
Comment

Comment