Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Holbrooke says Pakistan has legitimate interests in Afghanistan

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Holbrooke says Pakistan has legitimate interests in Afghanistan

    BRUSSELS, Oct 15 (APP): The United States on Friday acknowledged Pakistan’s legitimate security interests in Afghanistan, with its top envoy for the region welcoming Pakistani leadership’s statement that the country would be part of the solution to the decades-old regional conflict.“We have said repeatedly that Pakistan and other countries have legitimate security interests in what happens in Afghanistan. That’s natural,” US Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke said. “So, the Pakistanis must be part of the solution if Afghanistan is going to have a peaceful resolution of 32 years of war,” he remarked at a Press interaction.Holbrooke, who led the US delegation at the Friends of Democratic Pakistan
    meeting in the European capital, welcomed Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani’s recent statement on Islamabad’s being a part of the solution to regional problem.

    “I was very gratified to see that Prime Minister Gilani last week said exactly this that Pakistan is and will be a part of a solution, and for the regional issues. And this will be a major topic of disucssion at the US-Pakistan strategic dialogue in Washington next week,” said Holbrooke, with new US ambassador to Pakistan Cameron Munter seated next to him.
    The American diplomat’s comments came amid NATO and US officials’ expression of support for a Afghan-led reconciliation process in insurgency-hit Afghanistan, where President Hamid Karzai has authorized efforts toward reintegrating the Taliban who subscribe to Kabul’s constitution and renounce violence.
    Ambassador Holbrooke underlined the significance the US attaches to its strategic partnership with Pakistan by noting it is unprecedented that within a year three ministerial-level sessions of the dialogue are taking place.
    The Obama Administration’s special envoy said the recent incident on Pakistan’s border with Afghanistan (which led to death of two Pakistani soldiers in a NOTO missile strike and was followed by temporary closure of Torkham route for NATO supplies) has not affected the US support for Pakistan in dealing with aftermath of the devastating floods.
    “There was an extremely unfortunate incident on the border. I perfectly well understand the concerns of the Pakistani military and they expressed them in an open fashion and the two countreis made a very important decision to have a joint investigation, which is something that has not happened in the past.
    Secondly, the border is now open. Third, the incident on the border had no effect whatsoever on America’s support for Pakistan’s flood relief. No effect. There was not one second’s pause.
    “Our support for the people of Pakistan in this emergency caused by this tremendous catastrophe is unrelated to political and strategic issues, we do it because it is the right thing to do.”
    The United States, he said, is proud of the fact that it once again was the first and with the most assistance in helping Pakistan in the face of the natural calamity.
    “We will always do it for Pakistan. We did in 2005 in the earthquake and we did it this year.”
    “So there are three issues here. The border incident was serious. The border is now open. It had no effect on our support for the Pakistani people or anything else.”
    Holbrooke was pleased the way countries from around have responded to the epic floods in Pakistan and stressed that this coming together of Muslim and non-Muslim nations in support of Pakistan contradicts the notion that the world may be experiencing a civilizational clash.
    “The world has responded. The private citizens of the US, the Congress has allowed us to reprogram Kerry-Lugar-Berman money. The European Union has stepped up to the plate, Japan, Turkey.”
    Making a broader point, Holbrooke observed: “In both cases (Pakistan and Afghanistan) with so many nations supporting this effort from the OIC - Egypt, Turkey, Jordan, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kazakhzstan, Malaysia (all of them are not here, they will be in Rome as part of the international contact group) - there is a whole set of other nations.
    “The core point here is that the argument of the extremists - al-Qaeda and the Taliban - that this is a clash of civilizations - is completely wrong. The world can see that the Muslim nations and non-Muslim nations alike meet together to support democracy in Pakistan and Afghanistan. And we are very pleased with that. These are heartening signs that this is not a cultural, civilizational clash.”
    It's enough that I know, Our time had a home, In your heart..Was a place..But the glass always breaks..

  • #2
    Pakistan is a pet-hate among afghans.,,





    .

    Comment


    • #3
      What Richard meant between the lines in the language of diplomacy was very dangerous for Pakistan but is not being understood by those who are hypnotised by Noor Jahan's songs instead of knowing history of International relations. It will be naive to think that Richard Holbrooke was justifying the strategic depth policy of Pakistan in Afghanistan.

      What he meant in reality was :

      Before the problem [terrorism] is inter-nationalised [and west specially US gets affected] it is better to address the root of the problem - which is Pakistan's interest in Afghanistan. Now Pakistan due to its weak state structure and political economy too cannot handle the probem of terrorism by itself hence US intervention [and in later stage military presence] is necessary in Pakistan. So Pakistan's legitimate role in Afghanistan can be accepted [ if Pakistan accepts the legitimate role of US in Pakistan willingly].

      My analysis is that the basic stance of Pakistan army about strategic depth was due to Pakistan's India-centric policies [recently even spelt out loud by Kayani] which have been refuted by all analysts of substance even in Pakistan [Punjab] like Najam Sethi of Daily Times or Kamran Shafi of Dawn etc.

      On the other hand ,after going through 30 years of war and witnissing the prophecies of real national heroes like Dr Najib coming true , the invincilbe Afghans will never accept legitimate or illigitimate role of anyone as the current generation of Afghans is much politically aware than ever before.
      Last edited by Guest; 10-16-2010, 03:10 AM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by shlombay
        Well said Muhsina.

        We Afghans will not tolerate terrorist Pakis. Paki Govt is the most corrupt but we won't accept it.
        What corruption in pakistan has to do with you?

        Comment


        • #5
          Holbrook is machiavilian politician. He wants to bribe Pakis with nice words such as strategic partnership, no clash of civilisation with a pariah and terrorist nuturing and supporting state lol as if the "clash of civilisation" is a conception in Taliban and Alqiaida political discourse which he amusingly relate it to them as if it should intellectually concern us most hahaha. But then again he knows how these words can play in Paki minds, they love these praises from their American the moor merroona, and hence is also his platitude of using words like "legitimate interests" as if it is should be some sort of epiphany. That is why Talal saheb is celebrating. He can be excessive some times with his misplaced correctness. He was also pivitol in deteriorating Karzai and Washington relation when Karzai kicked him out of his office.
          Last edited by ComradePashtun; 10-16-2010, 10:15 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Jasmine
            Corruption in Pakistan has a direct effect on Afghanistan. Those corrupt border officials will allow the smuggling of illegal things and much more.
            But smuggling is beneficial to afghanistan

            Comment


            • #7
              No, -to rogue and non-state actors in Afghanistan who are allied with therrorist organisation ISI. And by the way the middl-men be it Paki or those of other countries, makes the most profit.

              Comment


              • #8
                @Muhsina you also thought that Karzai was in Pakistan to 'threaten' us

                Anyways the endgame is near lets see what happens

                US Allowed Taliban From Pakistan to Attend Kabul Peace Talks in Recent Weeks - ABC News
                It's enough that I know, Our time had a home, In your heart..Was a place..But the glass always breaks..

                Comment


                • #9
                  And Mullah Beradar is also apparently freed.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Taleban, welcome home!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X