Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cargo plane crashes near Kabul

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cargo plane crashes near Kabul

    Cargo plane crashes near Kabul
    More details awaited after police official says plane hit mountain outside Afghan capital.

    Last Modified: 12 Oct 2010 17:08 GMT


    Email Article


    Print Article


    Share Article


    Send Feedback




    A cargo plane has crashed into mountains near the Afghan capital, Kabul, the police have said.
    Early reports on Tuesday indicate that the plane was an L-100 Hercules, the civilian equivalent of the military C-130 transport plane.
    Al Jazeera's Sue Turton, reporting from Kabul, said "flight 662 was flying from Bagram airbase to Kabul, bringing logistical supplies for Nato.
    "The crew of seven people is believed to be a mixture of US and African nationals."
    "There is no sign that the flight was brought down by Taliban fighters. From what we are hearing from our sources, it sounded more like an accident," Sue Turton reported.
    A spokesman for Nato-led forces in Afghanistan confirmed there had been a plane crash but he had no details on how many people were onboard the plane.
    A police official had initially reported a passenger plane had crashed near the Afghan capital.
    Kabul's international airport is busy with civilian and military aircraft involved in Nato and UN operations in the country's conflict and aid efforts, as well as commercial passenger and cargo flights.
    Helicopter explosion
    Earlier on Tuesday, at least one person has been killed in an explosion inside a US helicopter shortly after it landed at a military outpost in eastern Afghanistan, military officials said.
    Seven troops from the Nato-led security force in Afghanistan were also wounded, in an attack for which the Taliban has claimed responsibility.
    The US-led International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) said in a statement that the cause of the explosion was unclear and that 26 people had been on board the aircraft.
    Isaf initially announced that 10 troops were wounded in the incident and two people were killed, but a spokesman later revised the casualty figures.
    "Operational reporting is very fluid. You've got to understand that we're trying to get all the facts," the spokesman told the AFP news agency.
    "There are seven wounded and one killed in action. It is up to respective governments to release the killed in action. The seven wounded are Isaf personnel."
    Recent attacks
    Another Isaf spokesman identified the aircraft as a US-made Chinook, and said that the landing site had been secured by Afghan and Nato soldiers.
    Eastern Afghanistan is one of the most volatile parts of the country, where the Taliban and other anti-government groups have a strong presence.
    The attack comes after roadside bombs killed at least seven people including two Nato troops on Sunday.
    Elsewhere, five members of a family died in a roadside blast in eastern Paktia province, while Nato troops were killed in an explosion on a highway in southern Afghanistan, the military alliance said.
    Sunday's deaths, which have brought to 26 the number of Nato forces killed this month, came a day after four Italian troops died in a roadside blast in western Farah province.
    There are currently around 152,000 foreign troops under US and Nato command in Afghanistan, and
    two-thirds of the troops are American.
    At least 2,014 Nato troops have died since the US-led invasion of Afghanistan on October 7, 2001, according to an Associated Press count.

    Source:
    Agencies





    Fea
    reconfiguration.




    Searching for accountability

    As Wikileaks prepares to release more documents on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, will greater accountability follow?




    Lebanon's JFK: who killed Hariri?

    Shrouded with inconsistency, the special tribunal for Lebanon could be sending the country back towards civil disorder.

  • #2
    lets see what route do airplanes take flying from bagram to kabul? And which mountain is there in between those to airfields?

    LOL!

    What a lie.
    [SIZE="4"][B][CENTER][URL="www.quranawsunnat.com"]www.quranawsunnat.com
    [/URL]
    [URL="www.youtube.com/Sangartube"]www.youtube.com/Sangartube
    [/URL][/SIZE]
    Mullah 4 Life! [/CENTER][/B]

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Afghanprincess
      Where is the lie Sangar?
      check out google maps and look for kabul airport and bagram airport. And see how many "mountains" there are in between those two airfields.

      You'll find out.

      Btw: the airplane is not a civilian airplane. It belongs to a private military company staffed by former military men.
      [SIZE="4"][B][CENTER][URL="www.quranawsunnat.com"]www.quranawsunnat.com
      [/URL]
      [URL="www.youtube.com/Sangartube"]www.youtube.com/Sangartube
      [/URL][/SIZE]
      Mullah 4 Life! [/CENTER][/B]

      Comment


      • #4
        A private military company's aircraft?

        That sounds much more likely than a plain old vanilla civilian plane. What would the latter be needed for in today's Afghanistan, anyway?

        Interesting about the lack of mountains in the vicinity...if that assessment is accurate, then why all the attempts at lies by US officials? It erodes the already very strained credibility of "ISAF".

        I'm wondering why that company would choose "African nationals" as crew?
        Is that usual ? Why would those be chosen rather than providing employment opportunities for Afghan nationals?

        Can they not find any who want to help them out? That's what I'm speculating.
        If so, to me that is a positive development in the overall schema...

        Comment


        • #5
          Yeah.

          Except when that plane 'crash' BENEFITS all the WRONG PARTIES.

          Then it is hyped and memorialized for nearly a decade to follow as a terrible terrorist attack. So that no Americans would have time to reason clearly but agree to lash back at those LEAST responsible for the incident. Now if they had invaded Tel Aviv and Dimona, well, that would have punished the guilty party according to my suspicions.

          Who knows the truth about the Air Blue flight which 'crashed' in the Margalla Hills near Islamabad. Theories - unsubstantiated - have whirled that there was a hijacking attempt too to damage Kahuta...no evidence has emerged one way or the other, I believe.

          But, yes, what a rash of these strange incidents involving a/c.

          Comment


          • #6
            unless the talibs have learned to fly there is absolutely no way they could have shot this down.. They can shoot down choppers cuz they fly at a much lower speed and altitude..taliban's most advanced and only anti air weapon is the FIM-92 Stinger, which neither has the engaging capability nor the range to take down a behemoth like an C-130..these C-130's are cargo planes but they are equipped with two 20 mm M61 Vulcan cannons, one Bofors 40mm autocannon, and one 105 mm M102 cannon...the helo talibs shot down was a defenseless chinook..and you cant really say shot down either cuz reality is they werent able to shoot it down.. they did enough damage to it to make it explode once it landed on the aribase..Im all for the fighting, but as far as these machines are concerned they are second to none
            It's enough that I know, Our time had a home, In your heart..Was a place..But the glass always breaks..

            Comment

            Working...
            X