Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Israeli settlements: UN Security Council calls for an end

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Israeli settlements: UN Security Council calls for an end

    The United Nations Security Council has passed a resolution urging an end to illegal Israeli settlements after the US refused to veto it.
    The Egyptian-drafted resolution had been withdrawn after Israel asked Donald Trump to intervene but it was proposed again by Malaysia, New Zealand, Senegal and Venezuela.
    The US has traditionally sheltered Israel from condemnatory resolutions.
    Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu said he would not abide by the vote.
    Israel announced its ambassadors to New Zealand and Senegal had been ordered to return for consultations. Israel has no diplomatic ties with Malaysia and Venezuela.
    The Palestinian leadership welcomed the UN resolution, which was passed by 14 votes to zero, with one abstention.
    President-elect Trump, who will be inaugurated on 20 January, tweeted after the vote: "As to the UN, things will be different after Jan. 20th."
    The issue of Jewish settlements is one of the most contentious between Israel and the Palestinians, who see them as an obstacle to peace.
    About 500,000 Jews live in about 140 settlements built since Israel's 1967 occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The settlements are considered illegal under international law, though Israel disputes this.
    Blame and bitterness keeping peace at bay
    US policy reverse: By Barbara Plett Usher

    The resolution reflects an international consensus that the growth of Israeli settlement-building has come to threaten the viability of a Palestinian state in any future peace deal.
    It is a view strongly shared by the Obama administration, and for that reason the US reversed its policy of vetoing any UN Security Council criticism of Israel.
    It is a decision that was taken after months of debate within the administration about whether and how President Obama might be able to define his position on a two-state solution before leaving office.
    But his successor Donald Trump has made clear he intends to strongly support Israeli government positions, even making a highly unorthodox intervention before the vote by publicly urging Mr Obama to veto the resolution.
    In a statement, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said: "Israel rejects this shameful anti-Israel resolution at the UN and will not abide by its terms.
    "At a time when the Security Council does nothing to stop the slaughter of half a million people in Syria, it disgracefully gangs up on the one true democracy in the Middle East, Israel, and calls the Western Wall 'occupied territory'.
    "The Obama administration not only failed to protect Israel against this gang-up at the UN, it colluded with it behind the scenes. Israel looks forward to working with President-elect Trump and with all our friends in Congress, Republicans and Democrats alike, to negate the harmful effects of this absurd resolution."
    Image copyright AFP Image caption Donald Trump has taken a strongly pro-Israel stance The US ambassador to the UN, Samantha Power, said the resolution reflected the "facts on the ground" that settlement growth had been accelerating.
    "The settlement problem has gotten so much worse that it is threatening the two-state solution," she said.
    She criticised Mr Netanyahu's support for settlement expansion, saying: "One cannot simultaneously champion expanding settlements and champion a two-state solution that would end the conflict."
    However, Ms Power added that the US had not voted in favour of the resolution because it was "too narrowly focused" on settlements.
    She added that even if all settlements were dismantled, both sides would still have to acknowledge "uncomfortable truths" and make "difficult choices" to reach peace.
    A spokesman for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said: "The Security Council resolution is a big blow to Israeli policy, a unanimous international condemnation of settlements and a strong support for the two-state solution."
    On Thursday, Mr Trump had urged the Security Council to defeat the motion.
    "Peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians will only come through direct negotiations between the parties, and not through the imposition of terms by the United Nations," he said in a statement. "This puts Israel in a very poor negotiating position and is extremely unfair to all Israelis."


    Bismillah, alhamdulillah, all praises due to Allah and may Allah increase the honor of Prophet Muhammad and protect our nation from any harm.

  • #2
    New Zealand and Venezuela care more about the Palestinians than their fellow Arab Egyptian Sisi does.

    But the two state solution was no solution form the start. In a two state solution, Israel would only recognize a Palestinian state that was under its control fully and justify its mistreatment of Palestinians by claiming they are not its responsibility.

    Ben Netanyahu and the Church (whose support rests on the belief that Jewish control of the holy land is a prerequisite for the return of Christ) want to expel all the Palestinians out. The question is will the Israeli's give the Palestinians equal rights in a one state. I doubt it since Beni people and the Church would be dead set against it.

    Comment


    • #3
      President-elect Trump, who will be inaugurated on 20 January, tweeted after the vote: "As to the UN, things will be different after Jan. 20th."
      Well of course, his Jewish son in law and his family have strong ties to Israel- funding the settlements. Trump is all about that ka-ching and Nepotism. Its ironic how Israelis are blaming Obama, he has been pro-Israel all this time- he was even called the MOST pro-Israel US president IIRC, perhaps on the dusk of his term Obama wanted to act ethical! exactly the way he did for South Dakota's Sioux people.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by sterge View Post
        Well of course, his Jewish son in law and his family have strong ties to Israel- funding the settlements. Trump is all about that ka-ching and Nepotism. Its ironic how Israelis are blaming Obama, he has been pro-Israel all this time- he was even called the MOST pro-Israel US president IIRC, perhaps on the dusk of his term Obama wanted to act ethical! exactly the way he did for South Dakota's Sioux people.
        Moron,
        Didnt you read the article. It wasnt ethics, it was because he did not want to kill the two state solution.

        Also that whole south dakota thing had more to do with siding with the trucking unions who stand to lose money rather than caring about the Sioux.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by khushal View Post
          Moron,
          Didnt you read the article. It wasnt ethics, it was because he did not want to kill the two state solution.

          Also that whole south dakota thing had more to do with siding with the trucking unions who stand to lose money rather than caring about the Sioux.
          What's with people on this forum and the word, "Moron"? LMAO, you believe that Obama cares about the two-state solution? Show me how?
          and perhaps you aren't an American that you really understand how **** rolls down here "Trucking Union" has nothing to do with that **** and what the **** is that? Standing rock was victorious because of the non-main-stream(preliminary) media attention and protest. Obama is just saving his face now that he is leaving Office, its called a PR stunt.
          Last edited by sterge; 12-24-2016, 03:04 AM.

          Comment


          • #6
            The truckers transport the oil, with the pipeline, their jobs are at risk, dumbarse.
            Dakota Access Pipeline: Unions Call On Obama to '''Stand Up for American Workers''' - NBC News

            Dakota Access Pipeline: What'''s Behind the Protests? - NBC News
            The pipeline has divided labor unions. Last month, five of the nation's largest unions sent the White House a letter demanding the president "stand up for American workers" and allow the pipeline to move forward. Other unions have stated their support for the tribe.
            You have a weak understanding on how things work. All decisions revolve around money and where its transferred.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by khushal View Post
              The truckers transport the oil, with the pipeline, their jobs are at risk, dumbarse.
              Dakota Access Pipeline: Unions Call On Obama to '''Stand Up for American Workers''' - NBC News

              Dakota Access Pipeline: What'''s Behind the Protests? - NBC News


              You have a weak understanding on how things work. All decisions revolve around money and where its transferred.
              MEH, nbcnews, **** that ****. Obama didn't even ****ing care at first. He called off the pipeline because of the protest and the Army Corp. As an adult informed citizen, I have a good understanding on how decisions are made here cos it effects me as well. Obama is a crypto capitalist.

              Stay away from mainstream media for news on the US.

              What he said first:




              VETERANS, PEOPLE, ARMY CORP not your ****ing trucking unions BS
              Last edited by sterge; 12-24-2016, 04:04 AM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Oh. I didnt realize your were a junky with conspiracy theories.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by khushal View Post
                  Oh. I didnt realize your were a junky with conspiracy theories.
                  http://www.pashtunforums.com/hujra-/50835-pro-weed.html
                  You mother ****ing piece of daalkhor. What was that you were writing about Firdowsi and inferior complexity and BS, you were writing a snippet on yourself, I see filth like you rolling over cow dung, you are that dung bug. Dawoos, you must be on meth carp for calling me junkie with a conspiracy theory, people like you with half baked knowledge and know it all attitude are the very reason Pashtuns and on the internet world Pashtunforums have a bad name. **** your and your chauvinist attitude. You sound like someone who beats up their sisters and brothers and mothers. **** you and your bloody oppressive guts given you have that ****ing immunity for being so called 'senior memeber'. Go learn manners first daalkhor.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by sterge View Post
                    You mother ****ing piece of daalkhor. What was that you were writing about Firdowsi and inferior complexity and BS, you were writing a snippet on yourself, I see filth like you rolling over cow dung, you are that dung bug. Dawoos, you must be on meth carp for calling me junkie with a conspiracy theory, people like you with half baked knowledge and know it all attitude are the very reason Pashtuns and on the internet world Pashtunforums have a bad name. **** your and your chauvinist attitude. You sound like someone who beats up their sisters and brothers and mothers. **** you and your bloody oppressive guts given you have that ****ing immunity for being so called 'senior memeber'. Go learn manners first daalkhor.
                    Now you sound like a junky that's going through withdrawals.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      keep it civil guys, no personal insults even if you disagree.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X