Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Israel attacks Damascus military airport near Assad's palace

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Israel attacks Damascus military airport near Assad's palace

    Israel attacks Damascus military airport near Assad’s palace


    Israel attacks Damascus military airport near Assad’s palace

    December 7, 2016 by yalibnan

    Israel’s military attacked an airport in Damascus near Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s palace early on Wednesday morning, Arab media reported, in what appeared to be the second air strike by Israel inside Syrian territory in less than a week. Arab-language websites in Lebanon and Syria reported what they said was an Israeli strike on the Mezzeh military airport in Damascus in the early hours of Wednesday. Social media channels recorded a series of explosions in the area of varying intensity, which then led to fires.
    Al-Mayadeen, the pan-Arab television channel, reported that explosions and columns of fire erupted at about 4am at the airport on Wednesday, and blamed the Israeli military for the attack.
    “It appears that a Zionist rocket attack struck military positions inside the airport, which caused massive and intermittent explosions for approximately half an hour while ambulances and fire trucks rushed to the scene,” Al-Mayadeen reported. It said the attack was “almost certainly” a rocket strike originating from the airspace over neighbouring Lebanon.
    Syria’s ANA news agency, citing a military source, said the airport was attacked by surface-to-surface missiles fired from inside Israel at around 3am. It said the attack caused fires but no casualties.

    Israel’s military did not comment on the reported attack, in keeping with a policy of not claiming responsibility for the air strikes it carries out in the region. Israeli media reported widely on it on Wednesday, saying that foreign media sources had attributed the attack to Israel.
    Israel has declared itself neutral in Syria’s civil war, but its military has struck repeatedly inside the country to prevent the transfer of what it calls game-changing weapons to the Lebanon-based Shia militia group, Hizbollah, which is fighting alongside the Assad government in the war, with the support of Russia.
    Later on Wednesday Avigdor Lieberman, Israel’s defence minister, made an oblique reference to the attack. “We are first and foremost making efforts to maintain the security of our citizens and protect our sovereignty, and trying to protect the smuggling of sophisticated weapons, military equipment and weapons of mass destruction from Syria to Hizbollah,” Mr Lieberman said at a meeting of EU diplomats in Israel.
    On Tuesday evening, the Israel Defence Forces’ official Twitter account posted a mapof what it said was “Hizbollah’s military infrastructure in Lebanon”, which it described as a “war crime”.
    Last week, Arab media reported that Israeli jets attacked what they said was a convoy of arms intended for Hizbollah near Damascus. Separately, in late November Israeli jets bombed a truck carrying four militants affiliated with the so-called Islamic State in the partially Israeli-occupied Syrian Golan region after the militant Islamist group targeted Israeli soldiers operating in the area.
    In Israel, analysts said it was unclear whether Wednesday’s purported Israeli air strike was carried out with the acquiescence of Russia, or without its knowledge.
    After Russia’s entry into the war with Syria last year, the Israeli and Russian militaries agreed a mechanism by which Israel could coordinate its sorties in Syrian airspace with Russia and avoid clashes. At the time, Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, assured Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu that Israel’s interests would be kept in mind. However, the agreement is delicate for Israel, given that Moscow is allied with both the Syrian government and Hizbollah in the war.
    Russia’s military deployed anS-400 anti-aircraft missile system to the Syrian port of Latakia following the shooting down of a jet by Turkey last year. In October, Moscow said it had deployed its older S-300s in Tartus.
    The system’s ability to attack aircraft over a range of several hundreds of kilometres was seen by defence analysts as compromising Israel’s ability to strike within Syria at will.
    However, Yiftah Shapir, head of the Middle East military balance programme at the Institute for National Security Studies in Tel Aviv, said: “People tend to look at S-300s as omnipotent, and they are not.” He added: “Even a weapons system with a 400-mile range can’t see over the horizon.”
    "The past is not my concern. The future is no longer my concern either. One minute. One minute of everything at once. And anything before is nothing. Everything after nothing. Nothing in comparison to that one minute."

  • #2
    Israeli jets said to strike Syrian army, Hezbollah sites | The Times of Israel

    Israeli jets said to strike Syrian army, Hezbollah sites

    Important military airport, installations near Damascus reportedly bombed; several Hezbollah fighters killed, sources say

    By Dov Lieber December 7, 2016, 9:46 am Updated: December 7, 2016, 10:08 am



    Writers



    Dov Lieber Dov Lieber is The Times of Israel's Arab affairs correspondent.



    Israeli airstrikes hit an important Syrian regime military airport in Damascus, the pro-Hezbollah Lebanese news network Al Mayadeen claimed Wednesday.
    According to the report, the planes struck the Mezzeh Military Airport, located in a suburb of Damascus, around 4 a.m..

    Other Arabic media, including al Jazeera and al Arabiya, confirmed that a large explosion had occurred at the airport. Some reports say the fire was caused because a weapons depot exploded.
    The Al Mayadeen report noted there had been no official confirmation from the Syrian regime that Israel was responsible, but added “it was almost certain” the explosion was due to IAF airstrikes carried out from Lebanese air space.
    A video of the explosion at the airport spread through social media.
    Large explosions at Mezzeh military airbase in #Damascus this early AM, unconfirmed if targeted by airstrike/rockets or fault pic.twitter.com/IrVNY4NXbb
    — Sami (@Paradoxy13) December 7, 2016
    Meanwhile, Syrian sources reported that Hezbollah sites near the Syrian capital were also targeted Tuesday night by airstrikes that killed and injured a number of fighters in the Shiite militia.
    Some of the reports, citing eyewitnesses, said Israeli fighter planes were responsible for the airstrikes, in the town of al-Zabadani. However, official Hezbollah and Syrian regime sources didn’t initially blame Israel for that attack.
    Israeli officials wouldn’t comment on the reports.
    The Kurdish website ARA News, citing an eyewitness, said the alleged Israeli airstrikes Tuesday night struck guided missile sites belonging to Hezbollah.
    The source told ARA the airstrikes caused “great damage” and killed and injured a number of Hezbollah fighters. The injured were scrambled to hospitals in nearby towns, the report said.
    The reported airstrikes come exactly a week after the official website of the Syrian government Sana accused Israel of carrying out bombing raids near Damascus.
    Hezbollah has thousands of fighters in Syria, providing military aid to Assad regime and Iranian forces.
    In April, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu confirmed that Israel had carried out dozens of strikes against Hezbollah to prevent the group from obtaining advanced weapons — a rare Israeli admission.
    Israel has vowed to prevent Hezbollah from obtaining “game-changing” arms — in particular advanced anti-aircraft systems and chemical weapons.
    Judah Ari Gross contributed to this report.
    "The past is not my concern. The future is no longer my concern either. One minute. One minute of everything at once. And anything before is nothing. Everything after nothing. Nothing in comparison to that one minute."

    Comment


    • #3
      1) Israeli airforce remains the only one to strike at Assad forces/Iranian/Hezbollah forces in Syria - the forces responsible for perpetrating a genocide on Sunnis in Syria.

      2) It can be definitely concluded that Russia fears any conflict with Israel even to defend Assad. Contrast this with Russian aggressive posturing with Western countries and obviously in Syria
      "The past is not my concern. The future is no longer my concern either. One minute. One minute of everything at once. And anything before is nothing. Everything after nothing. Nothing in comparison to that one minute."

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Insight View Post
        1) Israeli airforce remains the only one to strike at Assad forces/Iranian/Hezbollah forces in Syria - the forces responsible for perpetrating a genocide on Sunnis in Syria.

        2) It can be definitely concluded that Russia fears any conflict with Israel even to defend Assad. Contrast this with Russian aggressive posturing with Western countries and obviously in Syria
        Majority of Syrian army is Sunni, how are they committing genocide against other Sunnis, rather they are committing genocide against radical Islamists (most Syrian Rebel groups). Most Syrians belong to the same ethnic groups regardless of their different religions.

        Comment


        • #5
          I will say there's some "controversy" regarding the "Sunnis" that are among the Syrian Arab Army. Assad himself claims to be a Sunni; clearly he's not. I read some suggestion that for political expediency Certain Alawite tribes started calling themselves Sunni to power grab in Syria and also not create an initial reactionary upset against the majority during the uprising of the Ba'athist years.

          This isn't to suggest there are No legit Sunnis among Assad's forces, but there's a good chance most of them are not. Assad family has had preferential treatment of Alawites for most of their tenure of power. The military is one of those places where that was evident.

          Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


          Originally posted by ذو الفقار
          don’t try to be smart.

          Comment


          • #6
            Making Sense of the Syrian Crisis | Stratfor

            Syrian Alawites are stacked in the military from both the top and the bottom, keeping the army's mostly Sunni 2nd Division commanders in check. Of the 200,000 career soldiers in the Syrian army, roughly 70 percent are Alawites. Some 80 percent of officers in the army are also believed to be Alawites.

            Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


            Originally posted by ذو الفقار
            don’t try to be smart.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by sterge View Post
              Majority of Syrian army is Sunni, how are they committing genocide against other Sunnis, rather they are committing genocide against radical Islamists (most Syrian Rebel groups). Most Syrians belong to the same ethnic groups regardless of their different religions.

              Originally posted by sterge View Post
              Majority of Syrian army is Sunni, how are they committing genocide against other Sunnis, rather they are committing genocide against radical Islamists (most Syrian Rebel groups). Most Syrians belong to the same ethnic groups regardless of their different religions.
              So those Shiite extremists from Iranian Revolutionary Guards and Hezbollah are not extremists to you? That is interesting.

              For now, there is no such thing as the Syrian Army that existed in it's previous form before conflict broke out in 2011.

              The Shiite forces fighting in Aleppo for Iran and Assad have been drawn from Shiite militias in Iraq and Syria, Lebanon's Hezbollah terrorists, Iranian Revolutionary Guards along with several Shiite militias they have raised from Iraq, Afghanistan (Hazaras and Shiite Tajiks), and Pakistan (Shiite Punjabis).


              In Syria’s Aleppo, Shiite militias point to Iran’s unparalleled influence - The Washington Post

              Syria’s government hopes a brutal siege will vanquish rebel holdouts in the city of Aleppo, a key battleground. But Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s troops aren’t leading the charge. That task has been taken up by thousands of Shiite militiamen from Lebanon, Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan who are loyal to Iran, a Shiite country and perhaps Assad’s most important ally.
              "The past is not my concern. The future is no longer my concern either. One minute. One minute of everything at once. And anything before is nothing. Everything after nothing. Nothing in comparison to that one minute."

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Post
                I will say there's some "controversy" regarding the "Sunnis" that are among the Syrian Arab Army. Assad himself claims to be a Sunni; clearly he's not. I read some suggestion that for political expediency Certain Alawite tribes started calling themselves Sunni to power grab in Syria and also not create an initial reactionary upset against the majority during the uprising of the Ba'athist years.

                This isn't to suggest there are No legit Sunnis among Assad's forces, but there's a good chance most of them are not. Assad family has had preferential treatment of Alawites for most of their tenure of power. The military is one of those places where that was evident.
                The bulk of those fighting for Assad are Iranian troops, Hezbollah, Iraqi Shiite militias, and other raised militias from Afghanistan (mostly Hazaras who they enlist from the refugee population sometimes by force it is said), and Pakistan (Punjabi Shiites who volunteer). Read the article I posted above

                I think Assad is an atheist first of all, but he identifies as an Alawite and his family is Alawite. He is married to a Sunni from Homs. She has family in the UK. Her father walks around and practices as a doctor. There were intelligence reports that he was even calling Assad from his house giving advice.

                Iran is not really there to support him, but to push their Shiite sectarianism- really cloaked revival of Persianism if you ask me.
                "The past is not my concern. The future is no longer my concern either. One minute. One minute of everything at once. And anything before is nothing. Everything after nothing. Nothing in comparison to that one minute."

                Comment


                • #9
                  Sterge,

                  Are you a Turi?
                  "The past is not my concern. The future is no longer my concern either. One minute. One minute of everything at once. And anything before is nothing. Everything after nothing. Nothing in comparison to that one minute."

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Insight View Post
                    The bulk of those fighting for Assad are Iranian troops, Hezbollah, Iraqi Shiite militias, and other raised militias from Afghanistan (mostly Hazaras who they enlist from the refugee population sometimes by force it is said), and Pakistan (Punjabi Shiites who volunteer). Read the article I posted above

                    I think Assad is an atheist first of all, but he identifies as an Alawite and his family is Alawite. He is married to a Sunni from Homs. She has family in the UK. Her father walks around and practices as a doctor. There were intelligence reports that he was even calling Assad from his house giving advice.

                    Iran is not really there to support him, but to push their Shiite sectarianism- really cloaked revival of Persianism if you ask me.
                    Iranian clerics do not care about persianism. They see Iraq and Assad as their assets that gives them access to the Mediterranean Sea.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X