Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Iran's Grand Shia Cleric says Pakistan has allied with enemies of Islam

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Iran's Grand Shia Cleric says Pakistan has allied with enemies of Islam

    "Ayatollah Nouri-Hamadani stressed that the Holy Quran has emphasized that these groups should not be trusted but unfortunately, the Muslim community acts contrary to instructions of the Quran and instead of uniting Muslims, they unite with the enemies of Islam.

    His Eminence said that Pakistan is an example of one of those countries which has allied with the enemies of Islam."


    Full article: http://en.abna24.com/service/iran/ar...524/story.html
    Long Live Baloch Freedom Struggle Until Victory!
    sigpic
    Long Live Baloch Freedom Struggle Until Victory!

  • #2
    Originally posted by Friends of Baloch View Post
    "Ayatollah Nouri-Hamadani stressed that the Holy Quran has emphasized that these groups should not be trusted but unfortunately, the Muslim community acts contrary to instructions of the Quran and instead of uniting Muslims, they unite with the enemies of Islam.

    His Eminence said that Pakistan is an example of one of those countries which has allied with the enemies of Islam."


    Full article: http://en.abna24.com/service/iran/ar...524/story.html
    Pakistan has killed and raped more Muslims than Israel.
    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    Comment


    • #3
      It's hard to trust anyone who practice muttah.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Bengal_Tiger View Post
        Pakistan has killed and raped more Muslims than Israel.
        What do you expect from an artificial British invented state that was created to divide the Muslims of Afghanistan and India?
        Long Live Baloch Freedom Struggle Until Victory!
        sigpic
        Long Live Baloch Freedom Struggle Until Victory!

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Friends of Baloch View Post
          What do you expect from an artificial British invented state that was created to divide the Muslims of Afghanistan and India?
          1. You mentioned the Anglo-Saxon British but also now the Anglo-Saxon US sustains Pakistan's existence through financial handouts, IMF charity as well as arming Pakistan heavily.

          The Americans ultimately control Pakistan and are happy to see its massacres of Muslims in Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan, as they sided with the Pakistani army in the 1971 Bangladesh genocide.




          2. I had a Baloch colleague and I learnt a lot from him about Baloch culture including "Baloch Meyer" the Baloch equivalent of "Nang" i.e. honour.

          Baloch are a very proud people and Baloch are prouder of being Baloch than Pashtuns are of being Pashtun and everyone knows how proud Pashtuns are of their identity.

          The American-backed Punjabi/Pakistani army will not be able to subdue the Baloch forever and eventually the Baloch will win.

          The successes of their ethnic cousins the Kurds only inspire them more.



          3. The "Islamic Republic of Iran" keeps its distance from the "Islamic Republic of Pakistan".

          Iranians though geographical neighbours with Pakistan, culturally and mentally feel extremely distant from them and view them as inferior and essentially with contempt.

          Why do you (general you) think that there is never any talk of an Iran-Pakistan confederation?

          Whilst Pakistani nationalists are obsessed with a de facto confederacy/alliance with Bangladesh ("east Pakistan") a thousand miles away.
          * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Bengal_Tiger View Post
            3. The "Islamic Republic of Iran" keeps its distance from the "Islamic Republic of Pakistan".

            Iranians though geographical neighbours with Pakistan, culturally and mentally feel extremely distant from them and view them as inferior and essentially with contempt.

            Why do you (general you) think that there is never any talk of an Iran-Pakistan confederation?

            Whilst Pakistani nationalists are obsessed with a de facto confederacy/alliance with Bangladesh ("east Pakistan") a thousand miles away.
            Iranians are not natural geographical neighbours with pakis, that is why there is massive racial, cultural and psychological distance between Iran and napakisan. Persian people live thousands of kms away from stinking punjabis.

            Historically Iranians were bordering Baloch, Afghan and Brahui tribes to their east, but now they are bordering Afghanistan and Pakiland because Baloch no longer exist as an independent polity, they have been subsumed into Iran and napakistan whereas previously Baloch tribes had been locally governing and administering their own affairs even during periods when suzerainty over Baloch lands was being claimed from empires existing both to the West and East of the Baloch.

            Assimilation of Baloch into foreign nation states which have taken centralist approaches to controlling and exploiting the Baloch is only a recent experience going back to the 19th but moreso 20th century.

            Before that, Iranians were not sharing a border with South Asians at all. Only on paper but not in reality. It is Baloch who occupied that space but now only do so physically by their presence, but not politically or culturally.
            Long Live Baloch Freedom Struggle Until Victory!
            sigpic
            Long Live Baloch Freedom Struggle Until Victory!

            Comment


            • #7
              You're totally right in everything you say and it was informative and educational as I didn't know some of it.

              However my main point is that the Iranians have a huge superiority complex regarding the Pakistanis who they regard as an inferior, poorer, darker Indic third world nation who they want little to do with.

              The Pakistanis subconsciously know this which is why they never talk about any confederation or uniting with Iran, though always boasting about their supposed Iranian/Aryan blood (Pakistani nationalists such as Ahmed Quraishi and others always talk about how Pakistanis are the descendants of Arabs, Turks, Afghans and Iranians).



              Ahmed Quraishi, an "Aryan".

              If Pakistanis are Aryan and are in a large part descendants of Iranians, then why do the modern day Iranians want nothing to do with them?

              Rather than focusing on Iran next door, the Pakistanis focus a thousand miles away on a country which is closer to Tibet, Burma, Nepal and Thailand than to Pakistan i.e. Bangladesh.

              Pakistani nationalists talk about an alliance, "friendship" (vassal state working to harm India), confederation or even re-unification with Bangladesh.

              Why not with Iran next door?

              Because Iranians view Pakistanis with contempt and as an inferior state that would - even if they suspended their huge racial pride - bring them down economically, politically in any union.
              * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Friends of Baloch View Post
                "Ayatollah Nouri-Hamadani stressed that the Holy Quran has emphasized that these groups should not be trusted but unfortunately, the Muslim community acts contrary to instructions of the Quran and instead of uniting Muslims, they unite with the enemies of Islam.

                His Eminence said that Pakistan is an example of one of those countries which has allied with the enemies of Islam."


                Full article: http://en.abna24.com/service/iran/ar...524/story.html
                I've seen so many Porkistanis try to give themselves credit that they're "Iranian". On a coke studio song doing a ****ty remake of Googoosh, Porkistanis were quick to claim that "Porkistan and Iran are close brothers". They even claim to be descendants of Iranians (of course, they also claim they're Afghans, Turks, and Arabs). Goes to show that the country they so desperately want to be like is looking at them like ****. No one likes Porkistan.
                "If a lion comes and takes your share, go get it back from the mouth of the lion"

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Friends of Baloch View Post
                  Iranians are not natural geographical neighbours with pakis, that is why there is massive racial, cultural and psychological distance between Iran and napakisan. Persian people live thousands of kms away from stinking punjabis.

                  Historically Iranians were bordering Baloch, Afghan and Brahui tribes to their east, but now they are bordering Afghanistan and Pakiland because Baloch no longer exist as an independent polity, they have been subsumed into Iran and napakistan whereas previously Baloch tribes had been locally governing and administering their own affairs even during periods when suzerainty over Baloch lands was being claimed from empires existing both to the West and East of the Baloch.

                  Assimilation of Baloch into foreign nation states which have taken centralist approaches to controlling and exploiting the Baloch is only a recent experience going back to the 19th but moreso 20th century.

                  Before that, Iranians were not sharing a border with South Asians at all. Only on paper but not in reality. It is Baloch who occupied that space but now only do so physically by their presence, but not politically or culturally.
                  Best comment I've seen in a long time regarding Pakistanis. Couldn't agree more.
                  Last edited by Shapur; 05-16-2016, 07:25 AM.
                  "If a lion comes and takes your share, go get it back from the mouth of the lion"

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Friends of Baloch View Post
                    Iranians are not natural geographical neighbours with pakis, that is why there is massive racial, cultural and psychological distance between Iran and napakisan. Persian people live thousands of kms away from stinking punjabis.

                    Historically Iranians were bordering Baloch, Afghan and Brahui tribes to their east, but now they are bordering Afghanistan and Pakiland because Baloch no longer exist as an independent polity, they have been subsumed into Iran and napakistan whereas previously Baloch tribes had been locally governing and administering their own affairs even during periods when suzerainty over Baloch lands was being claimed from empires existing both to the West and East of the Baloch.

                    Assimilation of Baloch into foreign nation states which have taken centralist approaches to controlling and exploiting the Baloch is only a recent experience going back to the 19th but moreso 20th century.

                    Before that, Iranians were not sharing a border with South Asians at all. Only on paper but not in reality. It is Baloch who occupied that space but now only do so physically by their presence, but not politically or culturally.
                    Pakistani baloch are similar to dravidian brahui, they are fake iranics looking at how dark skinned they are. Around 700-1000 years ago small minority of west Iranics imposted their tongue on native baloch people.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X