Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

India, Pakistan and Bangladesh can become a 'federation': Ram Vilas Paswan

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Friends of Baloch View Post



    I dont get you.Why have you replied to my post with obamas picture.Whats he got to do with the comments i made.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by asif86 View Post
      I dont agree with dravidian theory.About 70% of Pakistanis are Caucasoid by race, 20% Australoid- Negroid, and 10% Mongoloid in their overall genetic composition. Majority of Pakistanis are tall with fair skin complexion, similar to Middle Eastern and Mediterranean peoples. While the racial features of each ethnic group are not uniform, Pashtuns are the most Caucasoid, followed by Kashmiris, Baluchis, north Punjabis, and then Sindhis, Seraikis, Urdu-speakers, etc. The Australoid-Negroid and Mongoloid racial elements are quite infused within the dominant Caucasoid genes among Pakistanis, however there are some that have retained their distinct racial characteristics.

      Pakistanis are a blend of their Harappan, Aryan, Persian, Greek, Saka, Parthian, Kushan, White Hun, Arab, Turkic, Afghan, and Mughal heritage. Waves of invaders and migrants settled down in Pakistan through out the centuries, influencing the locals and being absorbed among them.

      Most Indians are a blend of their heritage of Dravidoid-Australoid hunters and gatherers, and Aryans (in north). Northwest Indians have a heritage from Harappans, Aryans, Sakas, and White Huns. Northeast Indians have a heritage based from Mongoloid hunters and gatherers. Also, Turks, Afghans and Mughals ruled north India for centuries.
      Genetic analysis gives a clear picture. There is no such thing as true Caucasian, Dravidian, etc.. these are just terms. Pakistanis are mixed bunch yes, but they are not fully Caucasian. Like other South Asians, Pakistanis are mix of two very different types of populations. One of them was Caucasian type population called (ANI) from west asia/europe/central asia, the other one was (ASI) Ancestral south indian type population, which was related to the Andmanese from the Andaman Islands. Of course the ANI in Pakistanis, Indians is probably from all the invasions that occurred. from the populations you mentioned. So again, Pakistanis like all south asians are hybrid populations between two very different groups of people

      As for today, Pakistanis genetically are much closer to (South Indians) Tamils for example, then they are to lets say (Iranians) who are mainly a west asian population. So Over all Pakistanis are like there other South Asian brothers, not West Asian, central asian, Arab etc...

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Karachi View Post
        Genetic analysis gives a clear picture. There is no such thing as true Caucasian, Dravidian, etc.. these are just terms. Pakistanis are mixed bunch yes, but they are not fully Caucasian. Like other South Asians, Pakistanis are mix of two very different types of populations. One of them was Caucasian type population called (ANI) from west asia/europe/central asia, the other one was (ASI) Ancestral south indian type population, which was related to the Andmanese from the Andaman Islands. Of course the ANI in Pakistanis, Indians is probably from all the invasions that occurred. from the populations you mentioned. So again, Pakistanis like all south asians are hybrid populations between two very different groups of people

        As for today, Pakistanis genetically are much closer to (South Indians) Tamils for example, then they are to lets say (Iranians) who are mainly a west asian population. So Over all Pakistanis are like there other South Asian brothers, not West Asian, central asian, Arab etc...
        Can you really prove this point?not pics but any genetic analysis of South indians and pakistanis infact even the punjabis/sindhi
        "[B][SIZE="3"]Seer Speen Wazeer[/SIZE][/B]"

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Karachi View Post
          Genetic analysis gives a clear picture. There is no such thing as true Caucasian, Dravidian, etc.. these are just terms. Pakistanis are mixed bunch yes, but they are not fully Caucasian. Like other South Asians, Pakistanis are mix of two very different types of populations. One of them was Caucasian type population called (ANI) from west asia/europe/central asia, the other one was (ASI) Ancestral south indian type population, which was related to the Andmanese from the Andaman Islands. Of course the ANI in Pakistanis, Indians is probably from all the invasions that occurred. from the populations you mentioned. So again, Pakistanis like all south asians are hybrid populations between two very different groups of people

          As for today, Pakistanis genetically are much closer to (South Indians) Tamils for example, then they are to lets say (Iranians) who are mainly a west asian population. So Over all Pakistanis are like there other South Asian brothers, not West Asian, central asian, Arab etc...
          What are you talking about?




          Pakis are closer to Indian kashmiris and punjabis but thats it. You can also say afghanis are ANI/ASI as well. In fact majority of Afghanis are of 3 components, ASI/ANI/Mongol among tajiks, hazaras, uzbeks, turkmens.
          Last edited by tilla_jogian; 12-31-2015, 07:36 PM.
          Best post in PF history
          [I]
          ''Today the ideology of Pakistaniat within Pakistanis is so strong that even if world war 3 is fought within Pakistan boundries,Pakistan will survive.'' [/I]Da Bannu Mazdigar

          Comment

          Working...
          X