Anti War groups support Iran, Assad and Russia

[Shamlawar Khurasani]

Every time a Western country bombs a Muslim country, hundreds of thousands of smelly drunk liberals with lices in their hair along with their ugly girlfriends with hairy armpits block the streets to protest against war.

Yet, none of them felt the need to protest against Bashar al Assad or the Russian indiscriminate bombing of Syria.


Thats why I never support their ideology and their causes. They hate hypocrites.

[randolph85]

The fools see the world in black and white.

America good Russia bad.
Russia good America bad.

Don't forget that even if these liberals are protesting war, they have no problem with abolishing Islam in the name of their human rights. They are not allies because while conservatives want to use military power to abolish Islam, the liberals want to use their culture. Both are dangerous and the concept of "enemy of my enemy is my friend" does not apply here.

[Shamlawar Khurasani]

During the Cold War USSR use to finance and support anti war movement in America. These lefties here are still Moskous proxies.

[khushal]

Every time a Western country bombs a Muslim country, hundreds of thousands of smelly drunk liberals with lices in their hair along with their ugly girlfriends with hairy armpits block the streets to protest against war.

Yet, none of them felt the need to protest against Bashar al Assad or the Russian indiscriminate bombing of Syria.


Thats why I never support their ideology and their causes. They hate hypocrites.

Its not about about caring for people, its about thyself whether your a righty or a lefty.
Lefties dont care if other countries fight each other as long as they are not effected. They care and protest against using their own countries resources and blood for wars that only corps benefit from.
Righty's blood pressure goes up when other hegemonic powers get involved because they are afraid that their profit margins are going to be affected.

[randolph85]

Its not about about caring for people, its about thyself whether your a righty or a lefty.
Lefties dont care if other countries fight each other as long as they are not effected. They care and protest against using their own countries resources and blood for wars that only corps benefit from.
Righty's blood pressure goes up when other hegemonic powers get involved because they are afraid that their profit margins are going to be affected.

Lefties have the "white man's guilt" syndrome in which they believe it is their duty to correct the ways of the savages and that they are doing them a favor.

[khushal]

Lefties have the "white man's guilt" syndrome in which they believe it is their duty to correct the ways of the savages and that they are doing them a favor.

Thats lefty who thinks he/she is compassionate fooling himself/herself into thinking they are doing something moral. Righty uses the Lefty's delusion by convincing him/her into thinking they are spreading democracy and womens rights when in fact they are just installing another thug autocratic client gov that preys on its people.

Isnt the "white mans guilt syndrome" the guilt about what the "white man" has done in history ie killing, pillaging, raping, looting and trying to make up for it?

[randolph85]

Thats lefty who thinks he/she is compassionate fooling himself/herself into thinking they are doing something moral. Righty uses the Lefty's delusion by convincing him/her into thinking they are spreading democracy and womens rights when in fact they are just installing another thug autocratic client gov that preys on its people.

Isnt the "white mans guilt syndrome" the guilt about what the "white man" has done in history ie killing, pillaging, raping, looting and trying to make up for it?

The proper term would be the white mans burden but I have seen it used interchangeably.

Lefty doesn't need to hang on to the Right's agenda because both have the same agenda but different remedies, but now left and right agree on occupation in Afghanistan. Look at the socialist Bernie Sanders who said he agree's with Obama's troop decision. His Afghanistan policy is the same as Donald Trumps who said he supported the same thing.

[khushal]

The proper term would be the white mans burden but I have seen it used interchangeably.

Lefty doesn't need to hang on to the Right's agenda because both have the same agenda but different remedies, but now left and right agree on occupation in Afghanistan. Look at the socialist Bernie Sanders who said he agree's with Obama's troop decision. His Afghanistan policy is the same as Donald Trumps who said he supported the same thing.

Those guys are just looking at the polls and are trying to get elected by idiots that have no idea where afghanistan is on the map.

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/10/20/poll-more-democrats-than-republicans-support-prolonging-afghanistan-war/

But if one looks at it rationally. What would delaying everything by one year going to really accomplish.

[Insight]

Those guys are just looking at the polls and are trying to get elected by idiots that have no idea where afghanistan is on the map.
http://www.breitbart.com/national-se...ghanistan-war/

But if one looks at it rationally. What would delaying everything by one year going to really accomplish.

My predicition is that Clinton will win only if Biden doesn't enter the race. If Biden enters the race, he would win the election in 2016 in my opinion.

Trump is gaining a lot of support, so it will be a very tight race. Trump has crushed the traditional Republican party.

[khushal]

My predicition is that Clinton will win only if Biden doesn't enter the race. If Biden enters the race, he would win the election in 2016 in my opinion.

Trump is gaining a lot of support, so it will be a very tight race. Trump has crushed the traditional Republican party.

Its too early to tell, there is still over a year left before the election.

Special interests are dead set against Trump because he does not take money from them so it will be extremely difficult for him to actually be on the Republican platform.

[Insight]

The proper term would be the white mans burden but I have seen it used interchangeably.

Lefty doesn't need to hang on to the Right's agenda because both have the same agenda but different remedies, but now left and right agree on occupation in Afghanistan. Look at the socialist Bernie Sanders who said he agree's with Obama's troop decision. His Afghanistan policy is the same as Donald Trumps who said he supported the same thing.

I would not refer to the decision to extend the presence of 5,500 US troops in Afghanistan as Obama's policy. He wanted out, but has come under intense pressure from the his own US general Campbell. "Obama's wars" by Bob Woodward explains the tension that exists between the White House, military, and Pentagon with regards to Afghanistan and Iraq (at the time)

Obama has set the stage for the US exit no matter how hard the military tries to stall it. 5,500 is insignificant and the US General's original request was 20,000.

[Insight]

Its too early to tell, there is still over a year left before the election.

Special interests are dead set against Trump because he does not take money from them so it will be extremely difficult for him to actually be on the Republican platform.

Im wondering if he will run as a third party candidate if he does not get the nomination.

[khushal]

Im wondering if he will run as a third party candidate if he does not get the nomination.

Thats what the republicans feared since he would have stolen many republican votes from their nominee. The republicans made him take a pledge not to run as an independent in exchange for being treated fairly by the party.

[Shamlawar Khurasani]

I've noticed how many so-called moderates in USA endorsed gay marriage in order to support gay community hoping to see the liberal left to be more lenient towards Muslims.

In fact some of the leading figures of Muslim community in America said they have to support gay marriage because they are in some sort of coalition with the progressives.

This idea of jumping on the bandwagon of any progressive cause is not unique to America. There are a few Turkish and Moroccan MP's in Dutch parliament who support ban halal meat by way of making injection and electrocution mandatory for all slaughterhouses.

Their justification is a few Ilhwani fatawa and Egyptian al Azhar's revisionism. So in liberal-progressive ideological war against Muslims, they have the Ikhwanis and Al Azhar as their allies.

[Shamlawar Khurasani]

Most secular nationalists in Afghanistan and Pakistan are or use to be socialists. Their world view and perception is shaped by Soviet era propaganda in schools and universities.

The rise of Communism in Afghanistan was the work of these subversive activities of Soviet Union.

Today, many of these so called liberal and secular Afghans think their ideas and their perceptions are product of their own reasoning. In reality, they are conditioned in to thinking the way they do. This is why it is very difficult to reason with these people.

This video explains this quite accurately: