Jewish man poses as a Muslim - planned devastating attack on 9/11 memorial.

[randolph85]

Quite a large portion of zionist extremists are from America.

Regardin sincerity and the Palestinians, to be honest, I don't think Palestinians have any representative who is honest and able to serve the interests of the people.

Yes, it is more a blanket statement on the part of the Jew onto the entire Palestinian people regarding their leadership, regardless if the Palestinians are fractured or not politically. They don't see Palestinian "leadership" outside the their current lense. Their lives are going too well to worry about the Palestinian/Israel conflict, let alone to differentiate between Hamas and the PA.

[khushal]

Source?

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Society_&_Culture/ispotoc.html

http://www.pewforum.org/2013/10/01/chapter-5-connection-with-and-attitudes-towards-israel/

http://www.ibtimes.com/most-israeli-jews-support-west-bank-bus-segregation-poll-1962294

[khushal]

The vast majority of muslim don't do a **** about IS and taliban, I guess it show how heartless they are also?

IS and the Taliban rose from the ashes of a destroyed society from civil war who were left at the mercy of brutal warlords.

Israel is a modern industrial state who has the resources and modern law enforcement institutions to treat people as they wish. They choose to treat them the way they treat them.

[khushal]

Uhm excuse me, please explain to me how the dictorships in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Oman, UAE and Iran are still there? How the hell did taliban do the things they want, and how did IS do all those thing. I guess inocent muslim were brainwashed by the heartless en cruel west to kill each other. And then all of the poor muslim no come to the same west who destroyed their nations....

Where is the logic in all this?

The monarchies you mention are in power because Western militaries protect them from their own people who want to topple them and create governments that work for the people.

[Khostai]

The monarchies you mention are in power because Western militaries protect them from their own people who want to topple them and create governments that work for the people.

I see not a single movement in those countries that undermines their monarchie, there is not even an outside movement.

[Khostai]

IS and the Taliban rose from the ashes of a destroyed society from civil war who were left at the mercy of brutal warlords.

Israel is a modern industrial state who has the resources and modern law enforcement institutions to treat people as they wish. They choose to treat them the way they treat them.

Why did no taliban or IS type of people rose from the ashes of destroyed Afghan society after the 3 Anglo-Afghan wars.

[BarakzaiAbdali]

Why did no taliban or IS type of people rose from the ashes of destroyed Afghan society after the 3 Anglo-Afghan wars.

You are an idiot. Go read a little bit of history, between your red light district job, and your attempts at failing exams.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...Churchill.html

'The rising of 1897 is the most successful attempt to date to combine the frontier tribes,' wrote Churchill. 'It will not be the last. The simultaneous revolt of distant tribes is an evidence of secret workings. These features will be more pronounced in the future.'


Like his distant successors, Churchill believed these frontier battles had an 'existential' significance: 'Civilisation is face to face with militant Mohammedanism. When we reflect on the moral and material forces arrayed, there need be no fear of the ultimate issue, but the longer the policy of half measures is adhered to, the more distant the end of the struggle will be.'

His description of the enemy sounds familiar. Churchill singled out a 'Mad Mullah': 'A wild enthusiast convinced of his divine mission preached a crusade, here called Jihad, against the infidel. Even after the fighting - when the tribesmen reeled back from the terrible army they had assailed, leaving a quarter of their number on the field - the faith of the survivors was unshaken.'

and of course:

In fact, the evidence suggests the 1897 uprising was even more organised than Churchill thought. Behind the 'Mad Mullah', whose fiery sermons could be said to equate to Fazlullah's FM talk shows, stood a group of radical frontier clerics.

As in 2009, the fate of the eastern side of the frontier was bound up with events in Afghanistan. In 1897, the mullahs attended secret meetings in Kabul with Abdur Rehman, the Afghan 'Iron Amir', still smarting from being forced to cede chunks of his country to the British in 1893.

http://guardianlv.com/2014/02/taliban-and-young-winston-churchill/

Upon Churchill’s arrival in Malakand, the future Nobel laureate formed a low opinion of the Talib-ul-‘Ilm (seekers of knowledge), the forefathers of the modern Taliban. In one of his dispatches as a war correspondent for the Daily Telegraph, Churchill describesdthe Taliban “…as degraded as any on the fringe of humanity: fierce as a tiger, but less cleanly; as dangerous, not so graceful.” Churchill held the Taliban responsible for the pitiful conditions of the Afghans. These so-called holy men repelled Churchill for their loose moral conduct. According to Churchill, the Taliban incited the common Afghan to rise in rebellion against the British: ” …they live free at the expense of the people, keep them in the grip of miserable superstition, and enjoy droit de seigneur …no man’s wife or daughter is safe from them. Of some of their manners and morals it is impossible to write.”

[khushal]

I see not a single movement in those countries that undermines their monarchie, there is not even an outside movement.

AQ
The Ikhwan

there are others as well.

[Khostai]

You are an idiot. Go read a little bit of history, between your red light district job, and your attempts at failing exams.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...Churchill.html



and of course:



http://guardianlv.com/2014/02/taliba...ton-churchill/

I did not reat it.

stupid feget hahahaha

[Khostai]

AQ
The Ikhwan

there are others as well.

They are not against those monarchies, they get money from them.

[khushal]

I did not reat it.

stupid feget hahahaha

Which is why you are labeled as the idiot of PF. You choose not to read anything which is why you are good at failing those easy exams. You are what we call "tayar khor" and will be on welfare forever.

[khushal]

They are not against those monarchies, they get money from them.

source?

[Khostai]

Which is why you are labeled as the idiot of PF. You choose not to read anything which is why you are good at failing those easy exams. You are what we call "tayar khor" and will be on welfare forever.

I am not going to read any **** from a jahil person who starts his sentance with a insult. And I already have a job mr stupid.

[Khostai]

source?

Read the ****ing news. And it is you who claimed they were against them. Give me your source.