How west dominated the world.

[ghumbasa]

http://www.petrostrategies.org/Learning_Center/are_we_running_out_of_oil_and_gas.htm

Are We Running Out of Oil and Gas?


Crude oil and natural gas, like other natural resources, have a finite supply. Because we are consuming more and more of these fuels each year, there is concern that we may exhaust them in the near future. In this section we review the current supply of crude oil and natural gas and consider when we might run out of these valuable energy supplies.


Current Situation:

Crude oil and natural gas are finite resources. We know how much are produced and how have been discovered. The discovered oil and gas which have not bee produced are called reserves. The reserves of oil and gas exist in reservoirs below the earth's surface. Scientists estimate how much are left by trying to judge the reservoir's size and the amount of hydrocarbons that can be recovered. The reserves are determined based on current economics and technology. The reserves are those that can be economically produced using present technology and current costs and prices. Therefore, this value has a lot of scientific guesswork associated with it and can change with new technology like 3-D seismic and oil and gas prices.




If we divide the reserves of crude oil in units of billion barrels by the annual production in billion barrels per year we get the number of years of production left at this production rate. This is called the reserve lifetime or R/P ratio. This value can be calculated for the world, a country, a state, and a field. It is an important indicator. We would like this number to be as large as possible because that means we could produce from this field for many years. As we produce a field the R/P ratio (reserve lifetime) will decline. The same situation can be used to describe natural gas except we measure the reserves in trillion cubic feet and the production in trillion cubic feet per year.


At the end of 2013 there were 1,687.9 billion barrels of proven oil reserves. In 2013, the world produced 31.685 billion barrels of oil (86,808 thousand barrels per day). That means that we had 53.3 years of oil left at the current rate of production.

The reserve lifetime for natural gas is 55.1 years.

This means that if we keep on using oil and gas at the rate we did in 2013 we will run out of oil in 2056 and natural gas in 2068.

Before we relax too much, there are a couple of problems with this prediction. First, the world keeps on using more and more energy.Over the past twenty years, oil demand has grown 1.3 % annually and natural gas use has increased 2.5% per year.Assuming the same growth rates,we would run out of oil by 2042 and natural gas by 2044.Before we panic and wonder how fast scientists can develop other energy sources, we need to consider another part of the equation.

Reserves end-of-year = Reservesbeginning-of-year _ Production + Additions

This equation says that the reserves at the end of the year are equal to the reserves at the beginning of the year less production plus additions. What are these additions? Scientists aren't sitting idly by and waiting for the reserves to run out. As we have learned in earlier sections, they are looking for oil and gas all around the world and using sophisticated technology to find more oil and gas. Let's suppose that these scientists can replace 75% of the production each year. (This may seem like a pretty high number but companies that average this kind of performance would soon be out of business.) On this basis, we would run out of oil in 2097 and gas in 2087. Natural gas runs out sooner because it has a higher growth rate.

There is of course one little problem with our simple mathematical exercise.Does the world have enough undiscovered oil and gas?


The USGS conducts assessments of basins throughout the world and is continually updating their appraisals.

The USGS has recently announced that the area north of the Arctic Circle has an estimated 90 billion barrels of undiscovered, technically recoverable oil, 1,670 trillion cubic feet of technically recoverable natural gas, and 44 billion barrels of technically recoverable natural gas liquids in 25 geologically defined areas thought to have potential for petroleum.

These calculations always seem to trouble people. How do we know how much oil and gas are waiting to be discovered if we haven't discovered them? Is this a wild guess or is there some science involved in making this estimate? Actually, it's a little of both. Let's call it scientific guesswork. Scientists know where other rock formations may be located that could contain hydrocarbons. They have information on production from wells around the world that helps their assessment. These scientists also consider the latest technological developments that improve our ability to find and recover hydrocarbons. Of course, it is a lot more complicated than this and considerable effort is made in preparing a range of estimates.

Using these estimates of undiscovered oil and gas, we can expect to run out of oil in 2057 and natural gas in 2064.These calculations are subject to a great deal of uncertainty, however, they do highlight the fact that oil and gas are depletable resources and that we only have a certain amount left.

There are several things to remember about this analysis or any other estimates of when oil and gas resources might run out:

The amount of undiscovered oil and gas is an estimate and that estimate is revised based on new technology, new discoveries and additional information.Please see National Oil and Assessmen for more information.

The USGS assessments are presented as estimates at various levels of probability: 95% probability of at least at certain level, mean and 5% probability of at least at certain level.The range of these estimates can be significant.

Whatever the amount of undiscovered oil and gas that the world contains, it is a finite resource that has taken millions of years to produce.* Like all of the earth's resources, we need to be good stewards of the oil and gas supply and ensure that they are used most efficiently.

See the American Petroleum Institute report Strengthening Our Economy: The Untapped US Oil and Gas Resources




What Are Companies Doing to Find More Oil and Gas?

Oil companies spend billions of dollars searching for new oil fields. Each year companies try to replace the oil that they produce. If a company fails to replace and add to reserves they will not be able to increase production and revenues. According to statistics compiled by Houston investment banking firm, Simmons & Company International, major oil companies have spent about $260 billion over the past decade just to maintain the same level of production. Independent producers spent $16 billion over the same time period and were able to increase production by 6%.

Why are these results so disappointing? First of all oil companies are dealing with resources that are depleted or used up. The reserve lifetimes in the above table indicate how long it will take before the reserves are depleted. In the case of the United States, the oil reserve lifetime is 12.4 years. This means that 8.1% (1/12.4) or 2.46 billion barrels of the oil is produced each year. To replace these US oil reserves companies must find 2.46 billion barrels of oil. If the oil and gas industry wanted to increase production in 2009 to keep up with the increase in U.S. oil consumption, the industry would have to find 3.11 billion barrels (2.46 billion barrels + 19,419 thousand barrels per day x 366 days/year consumed in 2008 x 1.0% growth rate = 2.53 billion barrels).

The cost to achieve this is rather large. In spite of tremendous improvements in exploration technology, based on a finding and development cost of $18.49/B for 2005-2007, it would cost $46.78 billion in 2009. Where does this money come from? It comes from company profits and private investors. When oil prices are low, companies don't have enough profits to look for more oil and gas. The laws of supply and demand tend to balance things out because when supply drops, prices increase to encourage companies to find more oil and gas. So when gasoline prices are low, remember that this means less money to find the crude oil necessary to make gasoline in the future.


When Will Oil Production Peak?

One of the questions hotly debated in oil and gas circles is when will crude oil production peak.The date an level of this maximum production are considered significant because 1.) supplies of oil will start to decline, 2.) the cost of the remaining production will increase,*and 3.) the world better have a contingency plan to move to new fuels or suffer an economic meltdown.

The milestone is probably less significant than one might first guess.First of all the date is for conventional oil production and does not include supply from unconventional sources such oil sands and very low gravity crude oil or bitumen.The forecast also does not consider conversion of coal and natural gas to crude oil.

A study from scientists at the University of Newcastle, suggested that conventional production will peak between 2012 and 2024 ("Mathematical model forecasts year conventional oil will peak," Oil & Gas Journal, May 7, 2007). Forecasters at the Energy Information Administration predict the peak will be between 2033 and 2067.Analysis performed by PetroStrategies indicates the peak will occur between 2033 and 2047.The subject is treated in more detail in an excellent article on Wikipedia called Peak Oil.

For other articles on peaking oil production, please see the following links:

Hubbert Peak of Oil Production

Peak Oil Primer

[ghumbasa]

Marines or sea ways are important routes of occupation.But trading is finese way of dodging before expanding empire.

[ghumbasa]

Agenda 21
SOUNDS LIKE SCIENCE FICTION...OR SOME CONSPIRACY THEORY...BUT IT ISN'T.


UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is the action plan implemented worldwide to inventory and control all land, all water,*all minerals, all plants, all animals,*all means of production, all energy, all education, all information, and*all human beings in the world. *INVENTORY AND CONTROL.----Rosa Koire

Have you wondered where these terms 'sustainability' and 'smart growth' and 'high density urban mixed use development' came from?* Doesn't it seem like about 10 years ago you'd never heard of them and now everything seems to include these concepts?* Is that just a coincidence?* That every town and county and state and nation in the world would be changing their land use/planning codes and government policies to align themselves with...what?

First, before I get going, I want to say that yes, I know it's a small world and it takes a village and we're all one planet etc.* I also know that we have a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, and that as cumbersome as that can be sometimes (Donald Rumsfeld said that the Chinese have it easy; they don't have to ask their people if they agree.* And Bush Junior said that it would be great to have a dictator as long as he was the dictator), we have a three branch government and the Bill of Rights, Constitution, and self-determination.* This is one of the reasons why people want to come to the US, right?* We don't have Tiananmen Square here, generally speaking (yes, I remember Kent State--not the same, and yes, an outrage.) So I'm not against making certain issues a priority, such as mindful energy use, alternative energy sponsorship, recycling/reuse, and sensitivity to all living creatures.*

But then you have UN Agenda 21.* What is it?* See our*videos and radio shows at the bottom of this page, on our video page (or search YouTube for Rosa Koire)*or*
buy*BEHIND THE GREEN MASK: U.N. Agenda 21 by Rosa Koire*click here

CLICK*TO PRINT OUT FLYER:*WHY IS EVERYONE TALKING ABOUT*UN AGENDA 21?

Considering its policies are woven into all the General Plans of the cities and counties,* it's important for people to know where these policies are coming from.* While many people support the United Nations for its 'peacemaking' efforts, hardly anyone knows that they have very specific land use policies that they would like to see implemented in every city, county, state and nation.* The specific plan is called United Nations Agenda 21 Sustainable Development, which*has its basis inCommunitarianism.* By now, most Americans have heard of sustainable development but are largely unaware of Agenda 21.

In a nutshell, the plan calls for governments to take control of all land use and not leave any of the decision making in the hands of private property owners.* It is assumed that people are not good stewards of their land and the government will do a better job if they are in control.* Individual rights in general are to give way to the needs of communities as determined by the governing body.* Moreover, people should be rounded up off the land and packed into human settlements, or islands of human habitation, close to employment centers and transportation.* Another program, called the Wildlands Project spells out how most of the land is to be set aside for non-humans.

U.N. Agenda 21 cites the affluence of Americans as being a major problem which needs to be corrected.* It calls for lowering the standard of living for Americans so that the people in poorer countries will have more, a redistribution of wealth.* Although people around the world aspire to achieve the levels of prosperity we have in our country, and will risk their lives to get here, Americans are cast in a very negative light and need to be taken down to a condition closer to average in the world.* Only then, they say, will there be social justice which is a cornerstone of the U.N. Agenda 21 plan.

Agenda 21 policies date back to the 70's but it got its real start in 1992 at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro when President Bush signed onto it. *Click here to see a list of the countries that signed UN Agenda 21.*President Clinton took office the following year and created the President's Council on Sustainable Development to implement it in the United States. Made up of federal agencies, corporations, and non-profit groups, the President's Council on Sustainable Development moved quickly to ensure that all federal agencies would change their policies to comply with UN Agenda 21. *A non-governmental organization called the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives,* ICLEI, is tasked with carrying out the goals of Agenda 21 worldwide. *Remember: UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is a global plan that is implemented locally. Over 600 cities in the U.S. are members; our town joined in 2007. The costs are paid by taxpayers.

It's time that people educate themselves and read the document and related commentary.* After that, get a copy of your city or county's General Plan and read it.* You will find all sorts of policies that are nearly identical to those in U.N. Agenda 21.* Unfortunately, their policies have advanced largely unnoticed and we are now in the end game.* People need to identify their elected officials who are promoting the U.N.'s* policies and hold them accountable for their actions.* Only when we've identified who the people are and what they are trying to do will we be able to evaluate whether or not we approve of the policies they are putting forward.* Some people may think it's appropriate for agencies outside the United States to set our policies and some people will not.* The question is, aren't* Americans* able to develop their own policies?* Should we rely on an organization that consists of member nations that have different forms of governments, most of which do not value individual rights as much as we do?* It's time to bring U.N. Agenda 21 out in the open where we can have these debates and then set our own policies in accordance with our Constitution and Bill of Rights.**
************************************************** ************************ ***

Ok, you say, interesting, but I don't see how that really affects me. Here are a few ways:

No matter where you live, I'll bet that there have been hundreds of condos built in the center of your town recently.* Over the last ten years there has been a 'planning revolution' across the US.* Your commercial, industrial, and multi-residential land was rezoned to 'mixed use.' Nearly everything that got approvals for development was designed the same way: ground floor retail with two stories of residential above.* Mixed use.* Very hard to finance for construction, and very hard to manage since it has to have a high density of people in order to justify the retail.* A lot of it is empty and most of the ground floor retail is empty too. High bankruptcy rate.
*
So what?* Most of your towns provided funding and/or infrastructure development for these private projects.* They used Redevelopment Agency funds.* Your money.* Specifically, your property taxes.* Notice how there's very little money in your General Funds now, and most of that is going to pay Police and Fire?* Your street lights are off, your parks are shaggy, your roads are pot-holed, your hospitals are closing.* The money that should be used for these things is diverted into the Redevelopment Agency.* It's the only agency in government that can float a bond without a vote of the people.* And they did that, and now you're paying off those bonds for the next 45 years with your property taxes.* Did you know that? *And by the way, even if Redevelopment is ended, as in California, they still have to pay off existing debt--for 30 to 45 years.*
*
So, what does this have to do with Agenda 21?**

Redevelopment is a tool used to further the Agenda 21 vision of remaking America's cities. With redevelopment, cities have the right to take property by eminent domain---against the will of the property owner, and give it or sell it to a private developer. By declaring an area of town 'blighted' (and in some cities over 90% of the city area has been declared blighted) the property taxes in that area can be diverted away from the General Fund. This constriction of available funds is impoverishing the cities, forcing them to offer less and less services, and reducing your standard of living.* They'll be telling you that it's better, however, since they've put in nice street lights and colored paving.* The money gets redirected into the Redevelopment Agency and handed out to favored developers building low income housing and mixed use. Smart Growth. Cities have had thousands of condos built in the redevelopment areas and are telling you that you are terrible for wanting your own yard, for wanting privacy, for not wanting to be dictated to by a Condo Homeowner's Association Board, for being anti-social, for not going along to get along, for not moving into a cramped apartment downtown where they can use your property taxes for paying off that huge bond debt.* But it's not working, and you don't want to move in there.* So they have to make you.* Read on.

Human habitation, as it is referred to now, is restricted to lands within the Urban Growth Boundaries of the city.* Only certain building designs are permitted.* Rural property is more and more restricted in what uses can be on it.* Although counties say that they support agricultural uses, eating locally produced food, farmer's markets, etc, in fact there are so many regulations restricting water and land use (there are scenic corridors, inland rural corridors, baylands corridors, area plans, specific plans, redevelopment plans, huge fees, fines) that farmers are losing their lands altogether.* County roads are not being paved. The push is for people to get off of the land,* become more dependent, come into the cities.* To get out of the suburbs and into the cities.* Out of their private homes and into condos.* Out of their private cars and onto their bikes.

Bikes.* What does that have to do with it?* I like to ride my bike and so do you.* So what?* Bicycle advocacy groups are very powerful now.* Advocacy.* A fancy word for lobbying, influencing, and maybe strong-arming the public and politicians.* What's the conection with bike groups?* National groups such as Complete Streets, Thunderhead Alliance, and others, have training programs teaching their members how to pressure for redevelopment, and training candidates for office.* It's not just about bike lanes, it's about remaking cities and rural areas to the 'sustainable model'.* High density urban development without parking for cars is the goal. This means that whole towns need to be demolished and rebuilt in the image of sustainable development.* Bike groups are being used as the 'shock troops' for this plan.

What plan?* We're losing our homes since this recession/depression began, and many of us could never afford those homes to begin with.* We got cheap money, used whatever we had to squeak into those homes, and now some of us lost them.* We were lured, indebted, and sunk. Whole neighborhoods are empty in some places.* Some are being bulldozed.* Cities cannot afford to extend services outside of their core areas. Slowly, people will not be able to afford single family homes.* Will not be able to afford private cars.* Will be more dependent.* More restricted. More easily watched and monitored.

This plan is a whole life plan.* It involves the educational system, the energy market, the transportation system, the governmental system, the health care system, food production, and more.* The plan is to restrict your choices, limit your funds, narrow your freedoms, and take away your voice.* One of the ways is by using the Delphi Technique to 'manufacture consensus.' Another is to infiltrate community groups or actually start neighborhood associations with hand-picked 'leaders'.* Another is to groom and train future candidates for local offices.* Another is to sponsor non-governmental groups that go into schools and train children.* Another is to offer federal and private grants and funding for city programs that further the agenda.* Another is to educate a new generation of land use planners to require New Urbanism.* Another is to convert factories to other uses, introduce energy measures that penalize manufacturing, and set energy consumption goals to pre-1985 levels.* Another is to allow unregulated immigration in order to lower standards of living and drain local resources.

All of this sounds unbelievable until you have had direct experience with it.* You probably have, but unless you resisted it you won't know it's happening. That's why we'd like you to read our blog*'The Way We See It' (click here).*Go to the section in the blog (look on the right side under Categories) called*Our Story.* You'll get a look at how two unsuspecting people fell into a snake pit and survived to tell about it.

http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/

[ghumbasa]

More about it.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2012/11/19/what-is-agenda-21-after-watching-this-you-may-not-want-to-know/

[ghumbasa]

Historic Organizations:
The New World Order


Foundation:

The New World Order was founded in 1943 at the first Conference between England, the United States and the Soviet Union by leading Jesuits in Tehran. It was reconfirmed at the end of of World War II following the complete victory of the*Roman Cult controlling the Roman Catholic Church in the re-establishment of effective Catholic control of the former Frankish Kingdom principalities now known as Germany, France, Austria, the Netherlands and Switzerland.

However, the term first entered the public arena in 1949 through the work of Jesuit co-agitator George Orwell and his book "New World Order" providing a chilling account of the future world under global Catholic socialism (Fascism).

At the heart, the New World Order is a defined membership of global financial, political and industrial consortium based around the underlying massive financial assets of the Catholic Church based from Zürich still in control of the Jesuits and their continued monopoly as the only organization in Catholic history (excluding the Knights Templar) to hold a Papal document granting them exclusive rights to conduct banking and financial activities.

As the New World Order is a consortium of financial, political, military and industrial entities, its precise structure, rules of operation and agenda remains difficult to precisely confirm. For example, a few dozen private banks in Europe and the United States first formed by the Jesuits in the 18th and early 19th Century continue to remain the foundation pillars of the global finance and credit system -- the same private banks that have withdrawn hundreds of billions of dollars of credit from the global financial system in 2008 and 2009 causing what was a localized credit squeeze of bad loans into a global depression.

The New World Order also maintains a political military structure through co-operative ties between intelligence agencies and large private and public arms manufacturers such that this apparatus serves to protect the interests of the Catholic Church across the world.

The New World Order also represents a discrete group of global companies, principally involved in industries such as pharmaceuticals as well as substantial media and publishing interests, again which have successfuly maintained protection against Catholic interests, with the exception of unavoidable occassional public scandals such as ongoing pedophilia by priests.

The Jesuit Civil War (1942-1945)

In 1941 aged 75, Count Wladimir Ledochowski -- Jesuit Superior General --was at the height of his supremecy, a still fit and completely driven man. His army of Jesuit influentials had similarly reached great heights in all places held by Catholic Dictators as well as the United States. So why would a civil war between factions of the Jesuits break out at such a time?

One of the great historical anomalies is the behaviour of both Adolf Hitler, Fr Himmler S.J. and Fr Joseph Stalin S.J.in the Nazi Russian Invasion. Contrary to spin historians, these men had not only shown ruthless pragmatism in managing power until this point, but were actively working together on a number of military and scientific fronts until the invasion.

A frequent excuse given is that fiercly Catholic Hitler had become “drunk” with power and decided to invade Russia because he hated the Russians. But Hitler was a mere soldier, compared to Fr. Himmler S.J. the new Grand Inquisitor of the Roman Catholic Church and his massive army of assassins and torturers.

Instead, it is much more certain that Jesuit Superior General Ledochowski instructed Himmler to push for the assault on the understanding this would complete a clean sweep of Catholic National Socialism over Catholic National Communism. Similarly, it is clear that Count Ledochowski said something in reverse to Fr Stalin S.J. – that this was the plan that would ultimately destroy Germany as Stalin’s behaviour against his own country and people was nothing other than treacherous.

When Hitler invaded in June 1941, Fr Stalin -- against every other example of ruthless judgment to protect his own power -- seemingly invited for his troops to be slaughtered and defeated by refusing his generals to fully engage, then having the generals executed and then repeating the bizarre process almost up to Moscow.

However, by the bleak Russian winter of December 1941, the jaws of the Jesuit Soviet Machine clamped down shut on the legs of the German Army. From this point on, the fate of the Nazi dream and power were sealed.

For such a loyal German Jesuit as Fr Himmler S.J. such deliberate trickery by Ledochowski would have been devastating and unforgivable. The Jesuits had shifted their power away from Germany, France and Italy to America -- for the first time in the order's history.

On December 13, 1942 (aged 76) Count Wladimir Ledochowski died suddenly --almost certainly murdered by the very best assassins of Fr. Himmler for his treachery in dooming the German-Swiss –French “Illuminati” Jesuits.

Technically this act immediately plunged the Jesuits into Civil War. Unable to convene a General Congregation until the end of the War --when all Jesuits have permission to elect their leader --Vicar General Norbert de Boyne could not be made Superior General. This left the American Jesuits, led by Fr Edmund Walsh S.J. free to pursue their agenda along with other international factions.

The German-Swiss-Italian-French Jesuits during the war headed by Fr Heinrich Himmler S.J. represented the “Illuminati” – the old guard who had been betrayed by their slain leader Fr Ledochowski S.J. The other camp representing the new guard, the “New World Order” headed by the American-Canadian Jesuits and allies along with English and even Australian Jesuits.

Midst the two warring camps of Jesuits were "neutral" provinces such as the Netherlands and Spain, still battling for its survival against the popularity of the Vatican sponsored Opus Dei Mary (Mari) Spanish Satanic devotion cult.

It is during this event, in which unprecedented number of Jesuits were killed that the plan for the New World Order was hatched by senior Jesuits such as American Fr Edmund Walsh S.J.

The plan was confirmed by the Jesuit officials that accompanied each of the world leaders of Roosevelt, Fr Stalin S.J. and Churchill to the conference at Tehran in December 1943.

It is there we see for the first time the unveiling of the public face of the New World Order – an order of opposing “friends” and ideologies- capitalism vs communism, but all ultimately financed and directed from the same machine.

[ghumbasa]

Continue...
The New World Order maintains no official head office, other than the existing structure of the Catholic Church. Nor does the New World Order maintain secret archives or attent "secret" meetings in oak panelled rooms.

The entire structure, apparatus and relationships of the New World Order is largely in the public eye "hidden in plain sight" and has been scrutinized countless times by investigators and co-adjutators publishing misinformation.

For example, important New World Order meeting groups such as the Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission bring together many of the key members of the New World Order, but with discussions on subjects that to any observer would be regarded as largely "benign".

This is particularly the case in regards to the core reporting and power structure of the New World Order today. Excluding major meetings of members "hidden in plain sight", Jesuit Provincial Generals have divided their armies of priests into specialist areas -- each assigned the task of involving themselves with key people in that area of expertise to such an extent that their relationships and meetings seem both normal and natural.

For example, where a Jesuit who is regarded as a top lawyer and expert in Constitutional law meets with legislators, it seems both normal and devoid of any ulterior motive. When a Jesuit is an expert in a field of science, or politics the same can be said.

Thus the real power of the New World Order rests at the lowest levels of the Jesuit structure, with one part of the Jesuit organization never having a complete picture of what the other side knows unless they are at the level of Provincial General.

The eventual truce in the civil war of the Jesuits came in the form of a compromise of power- the New World Order is in fact a very clear and precise six (6) level pyramid of power.

Jesuit Factions of the Jesuit Order

Black Pope- Jesuit Superior General

Jesuit Order and Financial, Corporate and Military Apparatus

Re-constituted Illuminati Families (under the structure of the New World Order)

Holy See (with Pope as its head)

United Nations

It would be incorrect to say that the Black Pope is the most powerful person on planet Earth. Since 1945, the role has been largely symbolic and held by a candidate from a neutral country between the main factions of the Jesuit Civil War. As such, the role has been dominated by both Dutch and Spanish candidates.

The most powerful force within the New World Order is unquestionable the Provincial Generals of the Order- the most senior factional leaders of the Jesuits who continue to hold a truce since 1945. While the Superior General can technically give absolute orders to his provincials, in practice it has been the other way around for over sixty years.

Then we come to the third layer being the Financial-Military Apparatus which few people who believe in the existence of the New World Order would argue. However, few have ever heard of the real foundation of the global financial system in the early 19th Century using Jesuit controlled gold stolen from the Vatican during the Jesuit-Papal Wars to fund an army of private banks in Europe and the United States.

Then we come to the fourth layer of the New World Order apparatus being the reconstituted “Illuminati” families from the United States, Europe and even Asia/Middle East. They have no control over the Jesuits, nor do they wish to challenge them in any way as their various positions from Royal families, occasional Presidents, Prime Ministers and global leaders is dependent upon the favourable patronage of the Jesuits.

The fifth layer of the New World Order apparatus is the*Holy See. Contrary to common misinformation, the role of Pope is now of secondary importance to the legal apparatus of the Holy See --The Holy See, being the legal framework that claims Vatican superiority over all other laws of man as well as complete dominion over animals (humans being classed as animals by their laws). It is the papacy and Vatican curia that in recent years has waged and increasing PR war in revealing more and more of the New World Order apparatus against the Jesuits.

The sixth layer is the United Nations and legal apparatus which recognizes the*Holy See*as a legitimate state and entity, therefore its laws, therefore every national laws as subservient to the United Nations.

The Great Depression of 2009-2012

In 2008, the*Illuminati*bankers under the control of the*Roman Cult*in*Zürich*used their banks and gold holdings to launch a pre-empive strike against the*Jesuit*controlled finance system--choosing the sub-prime crisis as the catalyst.

In spite of the lack of real gold underpinning the modern global financial system created by the Jesuits, the creativity of banking and governments had managed to avoid a major financial debt fuelled meltdown of the system several times since its creation in 1945.

However, under the New World Order power structure, the Holy See and the Illuminati of cities such as the Munich and*Zürich*are subservient to the Jesuits --as they have been for 200 years.

Using the sub-prime crisis, the Vatican controlled banks simply refused to renew fresh lines of credit underpinned by real bullion into the system in the second hald of 2008 and again at the start of 2009, causing the whole financial system to effective "seize up".

Contrary to early reports, this does not appear to be a Jesuit driven action but a deliberate action on behalf of the Illuminati families and the Vatican against the Jesuits in the hope the the resulting social turmoil will set the conditions for future war.

Evidence that we are witnessing a war within the power structure of the New World Order can be seen by recent extraordinary negative and disruptive comments from the European Union and Commissions against plans by the United States to trade out of crisis.

There can be no doubt we are in the middle of the greatest power struggle since World War II. It is uncertain whether the Jesuits will prevail and the system restored to order, or whether the Vatican and Illuminati will succeed in breaking the shackles of forced subservience after 200 years.