Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why the West falls into civil war

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why the West falls into civil war

    "There is no appropriate couch to psychoanalyze the West upon, nor a psychologist available to bring the trauma of previous civil wars out in the open. The only critical reviewer is history. World War I and World War II were fought among Western powers. China was at that time a prey never subjugated.

    Now the world is much more complex and dangerous than ever, given the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Are there some criminal minds who even advocate the use of these weapons as the instrumental "final solution" of the West's quest for total world hegemony? Does the "West" deep down have reached a point of preferring annihilation rather than a diminished role in the world?

    Our perceptions of punishment may not work as deterrence for further aggression but on the contrary as reinforcement for more inimical behavior. If the world cannot transform mutual perceptions from threatening to conciliatory, it is in for a rough ride. Russia can destabilize other parts or the world and it can rekindle conflicts.

    Ukraine's history and social make-up point to a civil war already exploding and further break-up of the country - if the Russophobes keep the upper hand in the Ukrainian streets and the Russians in that country call for its dismembering.

    China on the other hand is staying calm and on the fence, assessing losses and profits for its long-term plan to become an economic power-house: "Beijing will also join Washington in handling bilateral ties based on such principles as non-confrontational actions, mutual respect, and win-win cooperation, said President Xi Jinping," reported Xinhua."

    Last edited by Toramana; 05-03-2014, 01:18 AM.

  • #2
    Its all about economic interdependence.

    Look at the American rhetoric against Russia vs a country like Germany. One's economic development is not intertwined with Russia while the others is, hence the weak EU response to the Ukrainian conflict. The Europeans were smart to depend on each other economically after ww2 even if they didn't actually like one another, it insures that no nation will commit economic suicide by starting conflict in Europe.

    This is why despite the talk of rivalry between China and America, neither nation could ever afford an armed conflict between themselves. I think this is what China planned since their economic boom, while the Americans were caught off guard and basically had to go along with it. The Americans hate it because now they depend on China and are fueling China's growth and future potential dominance.
    There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

    Sayyid Qutb

    Comment


    • #3
      The USA, NATO, China and Russia, is aggressive imperialists.

      Comment

      Working...
      X