Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mikhail Kalashnikov, Creator of AK-47, Dies at 94

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mikhail Kalashnikov, Creator of AK-47, Dies at 94

    Mikhail Kalashnikov, Creator of AK-47, Dies at 94

    December 24, 2013 by Afghan Mission
    By C. J. CHIVERS
    Source: The New York Times

    Lt. Gen. Mikhail T. Kalashnikov, the arms designer credited by the Soviet Union with creating the AK-47, the first in a series of rifles and machine guns that would indelibly associate his name with modern war and become the most abundant firearms ever made, died on Monday in Izhevsk, the capital of the Russian republic of Udmurtia, where he lived. He was 94.
    Viktor Chulkov, a spokesman for the republic’s president, confirmed the death, the Itar-Tass news agency reported.
    Born a peasant on the southern Siberian steppe, General Kalashnikov had little formal education and claimed to be a self-taught tinkerer who combined innate mechanical skills with the study of weapons to conceive of a rifle that achieved battlefield ubiquity.

    His role in the rifle’s creation, and the attention showered on him by the Kremlin’s propaganda machine, carried him from conscription in the Red Army to senior positions in the Soviet arms-manufacturing bureaucracy and ultimately to six terms on the Supreme Soviet, the Soviet Union’s legislative body.
    Tens of millions of Kalashnikov rifles have been manufactured. Their short barrels, steep front-sight posts and curved magazines made them a marker of conflict that has endured for decades. The weapons also became both Soviet and revolutionary symbols and widespread instruments of terrorism, child-soldiering and crime.

    The general, who sometimes lamented the weapons’ unchecked distribution but took pride in having invented them and in their reputation for reliability, weathered the collapse of the Soviet Union to assume a public role as a folk hero and unequivocal Russian patriot.
    A Soviet nostalgist, he also served as the unofficial arms ambassador of the revived Russian state. He used public appearances to try to cast the AK-47’s checkered legacy in a positive way and to complain that knockoffs were being manufactured illegally by former Soviet allies and cutting into Russian sales.
    The weapon, he said, was designed to protect his motherland, not to be used by terrorists or thugs. “This is a weapon of defense,” he said. “It is not a weapon for offense.”
    General Kalashnikov’s public life resulted from a secret competition to develop the Soviet infantry rifle for the Cold War. The result was the AK-47 — an abbreviation for “the automatic by Kalashnikov” followed by the year the competition ended.

    General Kalashnikov, a senior sergeant at the time who had been injured in battle against German tanks, was credited with leading the design bureau that produced the AK-47 prototype. The Soviet Union began issuing a mass-produced version in 1949.
    The true AK-47 was short-lived. It was followed in the 1950s by a modernized version, the A.K.M., which retained its predecessor’s underlying design while reducing its weight and manufacturing time.

    Shorter than traditional infantry rifles and firing a cartridge midway between the power of a pistol and the standard rifle cartridges of the day, the Kalashnikov line was initially dismissed by American ordnance experts as a weapon of small consequence. It was not particularly accurate or well made, they said, and it lacked range and stopping power.
    It cemented its place in martial history in the 1960s in Vietnam. There, a new American rifle, the M-16, experienced problems with corrosion and jamming in the jungles, while Kalashnikovs, carried by Vietcong guerrillas and North Vietnamese soldiers, worked almost flawlessly.
    By this time, in an effort to standardize infantry weapons among potential allies, the Soviet Union had exported the rifle’s specifications and its manufacturing technology to China, Egypt, North Korea and Warsaw Pact nations. Communist engineers would eventually share the manufacturing technology with other countries, including Iraq.

    The design was incorporated into arms manufactured in Finland, Israel, South Africa and other nations. The result was a long line of derivatives and copies.
    Because Kalashnikov rifles were principally made by secretive governments and often changed hands in nontransparent transfers, it is not known how many have been manufactured. Common estimates put production at 70 million to 100 million; either number would dwarf the production of any other gun.
    The rifles eventually filled armories throughout Eastern Europe and Asia and spread from war to war, passing to Soviet allies and proxies, and to terrorists and criminals, aided by intelligence agencies and gray- and black-market sales. The United States became an active purchaser, arming anti-Soviet fighters in Afghanistan in the 1980s and indigenous Afghan and Iraqi forces in recent years.

    General Kalashnikov’s bureau also used the A.K.M. design to develop machine guns for infantry squads, helicopter crews and vehicles. By the 1970s, the rifle’s design had become the basis for a new Soviet rifle, known as the AK-74, that fired a smaller and faster cartridge similar to that of the M-16. That rifle remains the standard weapon of the Russian Army.
    The general often claimed that he never realized any profit from his work. But in his last years he urged interviewers not to portray him as poor, noting that he had a sizable apartment, a good car and a comfortable dacha on a lake near the factory where he had worked for decades.
    Work and loyalty to country, he often suggested, were their own rewards. “I am told sometimes, ‘If you had lived in the West you would have been a multimillionaire long ago,’ ” he said. “There are other values.”

    How essential the general was to creation of the Kalashnikov line has been subject to dispute. A post-Soviet account in the newspaper Pravda challenged his central role, asserting that two supervisors modified his weapon during field trials.
    An amiable personality with a biography ideal for proletarian fable, he was given credit for their work, the newspaper claimed. The general disputed suggestions that the design was guided by others, but also said the rifle was the result of the collective that labored beside him.

    The Kremlin embraced his version, although a careful reading of the official histories and General Kalashnikov’s many statements and memoirs shows that his accounts of his life, combat service and work repeatedly changed, raising questions about the veracity of the conventional accounts.
    Mikhail Timofeyovich Kalashnikov was born in Kurya on Nov. 10, 1919. He was married twice, the second time to Ekaterina Kalashnikova, a technician in his design bureau. He is survived by a son from his first marriage, Viktor Kalashnikov, who is also an arms designer; a daughter from his second marriage, Elena Krasnovskaya; a stepdaughter, Nelya; and several grandchildren.
    Later in life, he disapproved of anyone who he thought had hastened the Soviet Union’s downfall, or who had been unable to control the political and economic turbulence that followed. In memoirs and interviews, he was harshly critical of Mikhail S. Gorbachev and Boris N. Yeltsin.

    To the end he was loyal to what he called Socialist ideals and the leaders who gave them shape, and seemed untroubled by the hardships endured by his family during the early years of Soviet rule. His family’s land and home had been seized during collectivization, and when he was a child the family was deported into the Siberian wilderness. His father died during their first Siberian winter, and one of his brothers labored for seven years as a prisoner digging the White Sea canal.
    Still, General Kalashnikov spoke of his great respect for Lenin and Stalin alike. “I never knew him personally,” he said of Stalin, “and I regret this.”
    http://www.afghanistan-un.org/2013/1...in+New+York%29

  • #2
    'Kalashnikov didn't care about making money out of AK-47'

    Get short URL
    Published time: December 24, 2013 12:39
    Mikhail Kalashnikov (Reuters/Andrei Kasprishin)



    Share on tumblr



    Tags
    Arms, Military, Russia

    Mikhail Kalashnikov was a Soviet kind of engineer, who aimed at protecting his country and didn't think about money, military expert Igor Khokhlov who met the inventor, told RT.
    "Father" of the world’s most popular weapon, the AK-47, Mikhail Kalashnikov died in Russia on Monday (December 23) aged 94.
    RT:You met Mikhail Kalashnikov. What was your impression of him?
    Igor Khokhlov: I met him at an exhibition a few years ago and the first impression I got from him was that he is a very young man. There was no feeling that that you are talking to a man so much older and more experienced than you. His mind was very agile, eager to accept any kind of new information and his manner of speaking and his manner of dealing with his colleagues was most impressive.
    RT: Did he talk much about what he invented the positive and negative aspects of what he invented?
    IK: The first thing that has to be mentioned in this respect is that the AK-47 was a revolution in the way infantry fights. He was the first person; he was a visionary who was able to understand that the combination of intermediate cartridge and assault rifle that’s giving awesome power fire to a person who is an infantry man, that was really the revolution. You see those experiments in Germany in the war, but the Americans, for example, they examined German experiments and they decided this is not a future of warfare. And Mikhail Kalashnikov was able to understand, given his experience in World War II, the future of this weapon.
    RT:Without being too technical, what's so special about it? What did he create that it lasted so long?
    IK: The basic idea during World War II was heavy machine guns that were actually used for stopping large masses of infantry and put in a small and compact submachine gun. So the idea of Mikhail Kalashnikov was to use intermediate cartridge almost as powerful as a machine gun cartridge, but giving this kind of fighting device to an infantryman and that’s actually revolutionizes warfare.

    Mikhail Kalashnikov (AFP Photo/Prakash Singh)

    RT: But that’s still a rifle that could shoot multiple rounds, so it still had the same sort of effects as a machine gun?
    IK: Actually yes. The idea of an assault rifle is having a machine gun but just lighter, more compact and that every infantryman can use. That gave attacking infantry awesome fire power, that’s why his assault rifle became so popular all over the world. It’s easy, it’s highly reliable and it has quite a lot of technical innovations. For example by shooting this assault rifle the hot gases that escape the machine, they remove all the dust, so it can shoot almost in any condition – under water, in dust, anywhere. That was one of the most important features of this assault rifle.
    RT:It sound as if one couldn’t develop anything better these days. But we are in a high-tech era right now, so will Kalashnikov’s assault rifle continue to dominate?
    IK: Kalashnikov is going to continue to dominate for decades. Now Russia is developing a new generation of personal infantry arms but based on Kalashnikov’s design. They have improved accuracy, they use more plastic, they use better metal technology but still the basic design is not changing.
    RT:He invented this to defend the Soviet Union but it was used in other ways as well: child soldiers, terrorists and ironically by the mujahedeen against the Soviet soldiers in Afghanistan. Do you think it was a burden for him to bear with how it was used?
    IK: I know that he was asked this question many times. His idea was that the inventor is not responsible for the way his invention is used. He created this device to protect his own country and the device has been so successful that no other design has been able to match it.
    RT:Do you think he regretted not making much money out of this?
    IK: I don’t think so. He was a very modest person. That’s a Soviet kind of engineer. My grandfather also was an engineer, also working in the arms industry all his life. Such people didn’t care about money themselves; they were protecting their nation, saving the lives of their compatriots, that was their basic occupation. You can see from documentaries about Mikhail Kalashnikov, he lived a very, very modest life.

    The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.


    Mikhail Kalashnikov was a Soviet kind of engineer, who aimed at protecting his country and didn't think about money, military expert Igor Khokhlov who met the inventor, told RT.
    faye's chauffeur

    Pashton's girlfriend

    I'm a Pashtun Princes


    Comment


    • #3
      in communist USSR, you cant really make money through innovation. Everything you innovate goes to the state. This is the main reason why you guys collapsed. There was no motive to innovate.

      This guy would have probably been close to a billionaire if he had made the same weapon in the US.

      Comment


      • #4
        He was great man of his time.
        may god bless his soil.
        His inevention was for peace not for war or killing.



        Support pashto language and greater pukhtoonkhwa.

        pa prady jaba khabarai pakhtun naka
        be laila bala soda kho majnon naka
        gero jabo kre lahoo pa khpal tahzeeb ki
        be pakhtu ba de bal hestsok rastoon naka
        hamza baba
        پَښتو کښې اُولېکئ
        Pashto Keyboard Online (Afghan) LEXILOGOS >>

        Comment


        • #5
          I was surprised to hear he was still alive. Whatever, his invention wasn't good for humanity as time proved. Kho who cares, where can you find a gun with this much weight and that much accuracy and speed, it's a brilliant machine!
          yao warokay ghwandi baagh ao pa khwa ye seen rawan!

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by khushal View Post
            in communist USSR, you cant really make money through innovation. Everything you innovate goes to the state. This is the main reason why you guys collapsed. There was no motive to innovate.

            This guy would have probably been close to a billionaire if he had made the same weapon in the US.
            do you mean me?
            faye's chauffeur

            Pashton's girlfriend

            I'm a Pashtun Princes


            Comment


            • #7
              ^^da durak

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by khushal View Post
                ^^da durak
                a ti dolbayob!

                so the main reason of collapse of ussr was that they cant really make money through innovation?

                and you are the main reason why there is no progress in afghanistan!
                faye's chauffeur

                Pashton's girlfriend

                I'm a Pashtun Princes


                Comment


                • #9
                  pochemu vy s uma durak

                  Well, no motive for innovation would be the correct way to say it.
                  The only reason the USSR lasted for as long as it did was because you stole the best scientists from Hitlers Germany. Well those scientists eventually died of old age and so did the USSR's iron curtain that was preventing people from leaving your hell hole.

                  And the reason there is no progress in Afghanistan is because your commies brought the same non sense to it.
                  Last edited by khushal; 12-26-2013, 01:07 AM.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X