Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Khamenei vows no retreat on nuclear programme

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Khamenei vows no retreat on nuclear programme

    Khamenei vows no retreat on nuclear programme - Middle East - Al Jazeera English


    Khamenei vows no retreat on nuclear programme




    Iran's supreme leader says his country will not give up its "nuclear rights" in speech ahead of talks with world powers.


    Last updated: 20 Nov 2013 19:23








    Khamenei said there would be no retreat for his country [AP]


    Iran's supreme leader has said his country will continue to exercise its "nuclear rights" in a speech ahead of crucial talks in Geneva over Tehran's disputed nuclear programme.
    In a rare, live televised address on Wednesday, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei told commanders of the Basij force, a volunteer militia of young Iranians, that there would be no retreat for his country.
    "I insist on stabilising the rights of the Iranian nation, including the nuclear rights," he said. "I insist on not retreating one step from the rights of the Iranian nation."
    He said Iran's negotiators "must respect these limits" when talking about the nuclear programme with "enemies and opponents".


    Israelis in Moscow for talks.
    His comments came hours before diplomats from the US, Britain, France, China, Russia and Germany opened a new round of talks in Geneva with Iranian negotiators - the third set in a little over a month. They lasted 10 minutes and were introductory, diplomats said.
    Iran has signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, which affords nations the right to civilian nuclear technology in exchange for not acquiring nuclear weapons. However, Iran has been judged by the UN's nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, to be in breach of its agreements for infringements such as not disclosing its activities and not allowing full inspections.
    The UN Security Council has in return imposed sanctions on Iran, crippling its economy. The Geneva talks are aimed at agreeing concessions from Iran on its nuclear activities in return for the easing of sanctions. At the heart of the disagreements are Iran's continued enrichment of uranium to near a "weapons-useable" threshold, and work on its Arak heavy water reactor, which would produce plutonium, which can be used in a future nuclear bomb.
    Previous talks
    During previous rounds of negotiations, the group of world powers said it was close to winning concessions from Iran on slowing its nuclear work in exchange for easing international sanctions.
    The group is now trying to see if they can get past the problems that existed last time they met just under two weeks ago, said Al Jazeera’s James Bays, who is in Geneva.
    "Then, France had particular objections to parts of the deal that were on the table, particularly what happens to the uranium that’s already been enriched by Iran to about 20 percent, and also the heavy water plant that Iran is building," Bays said.
    Top policymakers have said that an interim accord with Iran could finally be within reach, but caution that differences remain and could still prevent an agreement.
    International demands on Iran include suspending enrichment of uranium to 20 percent fissile purity - a significant advance towards the threshold for bomb fuel - as well as limiting its enrichment capacity and postponing the Arak reactor project.
    Israel, which has not signed the NNPT and is suspected of owning a nuclear arsenal it has never declared, is opposed to Iran having any nuclear capacity and wants stronger sanctions to force Iran into a deal.
    Binyamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, likened Iran's nuclear capacity to that of chemical weapons in Syria, which he said must be destroyed completely. His remarks came after a meeting with the Russian president, Vladimir Putin in Moscow.
    Iran has always denied it is trying to gain a nuclear weapon.
    The IAEA recently said that both enrichment and work on Arak had been reduced since Hassan Rouhani became president earlier this year.

  • #2
    Four new Iranian conditions block nuclear accord in Geneva. Putin calls Rouhani, Lavrov attacks Israel

    Four new Iranian conditions block nuclear accord in Geneva. Putin calls Rouhani, Lavrov attacks Israel
    DEBKAfile Special Report November 19, 2013, 9:57 AM (IDT)

    The US and Russian presidents after bringing all their weight to bear on Tehran have failed to gain an inch toward a possible deal at the resumed nuclear talks in Geneva Wednesday Nov. 20, after being blocked by hardliners at the Iranian end. Tuesday, Kayhan, the mouthpiece of supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the Revolutionary Guards, ran an article telling Foreign Minister Javad Zarif he should not go to Geneva at all.
    debkafile’s Iranian sources reveal the red lines with which the Iranian delegation to the talks has been armed for accepting an interim deal with the six powers on their nuclear program:
    1) Iran will not shut down its underground enrichment plant at Fordo.
    2) Work on building the Arak heavy water reactor will not be halted.
    3) Iran will not allow the export of a single gram of its enriched uranium from the country.
    4) Iran will not sign the Additional Protocol of the Non-Proliferation Treaty which expands international supervision of its nuclear program and permits snap inspections.
    That the radicals are calling the shots in Tehran was obvious to every Iranian from the large blow-ups of the intransigent ex-president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad adorning Tehran newspapers in the last couple of days. President Hassan Rouhani may be elected president, but his campaign of smiles to the West has been superseded by the radical nuclear line espoused by the man he defeated at the polls. Ahmadinejad is riding high again in Tehran.
    Zarif has admitted that his life may be forfeit if he dares make concessions to the West. Still, he is likely to take his seat at the resumed Geneva conference Wednesday, even though the fourtough directives tie him hand and foot. Therefore, unless Tehran is suddenly persuaded to moderate its position, this conference has nowhere to go.
    Given the political balance in Tehran – which debkafile began covering in exclusive reports Monday – it is hard to see a deal coming out of Geneva, unless President Barack Obama accepts the four Iranian noes and gives the radical rulers of the Islamic Republic a major success.
    US Secretary of State John Kerry therefore sees no point in visiting Israel Friday as he planned. It might be a bit much for him to turn up empty-handed insofar as a nuclear deal with Iran is concerned, and also watch his second major effort, the peace track with the Palestinians, floundering between flops.
    debkafile note the strange paradox of two leaders, Ayatollah Khamenei and Prime Minister Netanyahu, who are implacable adversaries in all else, maneuvering with all their might for the same object of taking the wind out of the sails of a potential nuclear deal between the six powers and Iran.
    Khamenei is confident he can bring President Obama to heel and force him to live with key elements of Iran’s nuclear bomb program. Israel wants that program brought a lot closer to its dismantlement by tougher sanctions. He is seconded in this demand by France in public statements by its president Francois Hollande, and Saudi Arabia, which prefers not to admit to supporting the Israeli campaign.
    Early Tuesday, the heavyweights of Washington and Moscow went into action for a last-ditch bid to tip the scales back in favor of the deal.
    President Obama appealed in person to US senators to postpone legislation for tougher sanctions against Iran. They are expected to agree to put off the bipartisan initiative until next month.
    President Putin was on the phone to Rouhani, after which the Kremlin announced, “There is a real chance for a nuclear deal.”
    Kerry and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov talked by phone and then, each according to his style, berated Netanyahu.
    The US Secretary said: “I have great respect for Netanyahu’s concerns about his country.” He has “every right” to state his opposition to a potential nuclear deal with Iran and defend what “he perceives” is in Israel’s interests. But, he aloso assured “Netanyahu, ordinary Israelis and pro-Israel members of Congress who are opposed to the proposed agreement” that "Nothing that we are doing here, in my judgment, will put Israel at any additional risk. In fact, let me make this clear, we believe it reduces risk."
    Without mentioning Israel or Netanyahu, Lavrov rejected their assessment that the deal on the table would leave Iran with the capacity to assemble a nuclear weapon within 26 days as “far from reality.” He then criticized those who cast doubt on the intelligence and integrity of the parties conducting negotiations with Iran.
    This rebuff came shortly before Netanyahu was due to land in Moscow Wednesday, Nov. 20, for talks with
    the Russian president and may have been intended to set a stiff tone for those talks.
    The contest between the White House and Kremlin over who can beat the Israeli prime minister more effectively may be convenient for venting their frustration over the Iranian leader’s ability to elude any direct attempts to force him into line, or even reach him. They find themselves beating their heads against a blank wall while the radical front, which rejects any reasonable nuclear deal with the West, gains the upper hand in Tehran.

    Comment

    Working...
    X