Vladimir Putin saves the world?

[Insight]

[QUOTE]

Not sure what "Insight" (UnknownPrince) said above, nor do I care really, but I do know that he mentioned me in another thread and yes (maybe wrongly) I unignored that thread and read his false claims/analysis.

Haha, you responds and reacts to what I post.

For the sake of readers.

1. UnknownPrince ("Insight" a.k.a. Lynx a.k.a Ghundal a.k.a. Shah-i-Kot a.k.a Ashraf Ghaljay) said that there were some Chinese missiles in the hands of militants which shot down some Syrian helicopters.

2. Maybe this is true but there is no evidence to indicate that China sold this directly to these militants. It is like claiming that militants using Kalashnikovs are being supplied directly by Russia, when anyone can get hold of a Kalashnikov.

Obviously, the article I posted about Chinese missiles does not mean that China supports the Syrian rebels. The article showed that the Global Times (Chinese state news) and State TV did a segment on how the successful downing of Assad regime choppers by Syrian rebels using Chinese MANPADs was good publicity for Chinese weapons


http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/76...l#.UgpdHmR4afs

You still think they care about Assad ? They are boasting about their missiles downing Assad regime choppers of State TV!!

However what the troll fails to realize is that China is generally neutral, non-interventionist in global politics and doesn't believe in offending anyone, but despite that even the heavily non-interventionist Chinese:

a - Were ready to block a UN resolution allowing American bombing of Syria.

b - Sent warships close to the Syrian coast in tandem with Russia.

c - conduct major military exercises with Russia (as a message to America) and are allied to Iran too.

However "Insight" (UnknownPrince) will probably now claim that China is against the Syrian government and is supporting anti-Syrian rebels...lol.

What you fail to realize (who pretends to talk facts) that China's claim for going to the Mediterranean was to observe Russia and the US warships

. Aside from being requested by Russia to veto the UN resolution, China refused to block the probe into Assad's chemical weapons use which Russia has been blocking until recently. Also, China did not stand by Russia on their aggression in Ukraine (which you support to).

China would never go to war for Assad, Russia, or Iran, not when the US is China's biggest trading partner (in bold so you don't ignore LOL), not when China loves using the US dollar in trade because of the safety it provides their investments.

China doesn't defend Iranian troops and Assad regime from Israeli airstrikes!!!

Now if this is the Chinese completely acting out of character and vetoing a UN resolution (something they hardly ever do e.g .even UN resolutions against Iran - which is an ally of their, but no doubt "Insight" will now claim Iran and China are "enemies")

China actually supported UN nuclear sanctions on Iran. Also, your Russian heroes did too. China did not veto it. Maybe you did not know this?

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/may/18/iran-un-sanctions-russia-china

Iran faces fresh sanctions as Russia and China support UN resolution

The security council is set to impose tough sanctions on Iran next month after a surprise shift by Russia and China in favour of punitive action against Tehran's military and financial institutions, according to a security council source.

, and a UN resolution which did not even authorize force but was a moral condemnation with no actual real sanctions or punitive action, imagine what the Chinese would do if the Syrian regime was actually directly threatened?

One question, what has your Russian and Iranian heroes done to stop Israel from conducting airstrikes against Assad regime/Hezbollah/ and Iranian troops in Syria?

Has Iran (whose IRGC is occupying Syria), have they done anything to stop those airstrikes on themselves in Syria? They don't even respond!!

What does China do? Israel actually sells military technology to China. China's FD 2000 air defense system and other military weapons are made with some of the US technology sold by Israel which US does not approve of.

http://defensetech.org/2013/12/24/report-israel-passes-u-s-military-technology-to-china/

Maybe send war ships all the way from China to the Syrian coast perhaps?

Oops...they actually did that!

I am not even a fan of China, just correcting your purposeful drawn out misinformation on this matter.
Yes, you still did not provide me one shred of evidence showing China giving military support to Assad regime in Syria!!! Im still waiting, and you have all the time. China claims their ships were there to observe the US and Russia. It is foolish to think that China would go to war against their largest trading partner (the US) for Assad regime/Iran and Russia


China doesn't go to war for Assad when Israel strikes Assad regime. Nor has Russia or Iran (even when Iranian troops get hit by these airstrikes)

Syria: Israel kills Iran's Revolutionary Guard general Mohammed Allahdadi in Golan Heights strike

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/syria-israel-kills-irans-revolutionary-guard-general-mohammed-allahdadi-killed-golan-heights-1484092

Did Russia defend Assad regime/Hezbollah and those Iranian troops? Remember Russia has had the Tartus Naval facility for a long time, have been present in Syria (in Damascus) with military advisers too. They still were unable to defend Assad regime and Iranian troops from Israeli airstrikes.

[Insight]

[MENTION=1058]Bengal_Tiger[/MENTION]

This was in the previous response, but reposting here.

Again, China doesn't go to war for Assad when Israel strikes Assad regime. Why do you think they would defend Assad regime from any other nation?

Nor has Russia or Iran (even when Iranian troops get hit by these airstrikes!!) This disproves your claim that Russia will go to war for the Assad regime and Iran.

Syria: Israel kills Iran's Revolutionary Guard general Mohammed Allahdadi in Golan Heights strike



https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/syria-isra...eights-1484092

Did Russia defend Assad regime/Hezbollah and those Iranian troops? Remember Russia has had the Tartus Naval facility for a long time, have been present in Syria (in Damascus) with military advisers too. They still were unable to defend Assad regime and Iranian troops from Israeli airstrikes.

[Bengal_Tiger]

Yesterday 08:23 AM
Insight This user is on your Ignore List.
Yesterday 08:15 AM
Insight This user is on your Ignore List.

Insight = UnknownPrince

The troll above is on my ignore. Since no one even bothers commenting on the multiple threads he opens on the same topic he has come to derail my thread.

Anyway to give an idea of the amount of credibility this Pakistani Taliban supporter has, this is one thread he started a while back:


"Report: Russia turning its back on Syrian regime, not honoring prior agreements"


LOL!

This thread was posted in June, now it's September and the Taliban supporter (Insight) is posing threads like this:

Russian troops join combat in Syria - sources


Insight in June: Russia is turning its back on Syria.

Insight in September: Russia is sending soldiers to fight in Syria.



^

lol



lol

[Bengal_Tiger]

For anyone who is not a house negro (Brown Skinned Coward) or a Pakistani equivalent, a "Dil dil Pakistani Pathan" (jankhan) and who is interested in independent analysis which does not parrot what the mainstream corporate media say, here is an interesting article from a generally good blog:


Syria: The (Russian Air) Cavalry Is Coming

In light of the catastrophic outcome of the "western" war on Libya the Russian government declared to oppose any further such "regime change" in the Middle East. But the U.S. continues to train, arm and finance insurgents against the Syrian Arab Republic and, under the disguise of fighting the Islamic State, prepares to take down the Syrian government. Eliminating the Syrian government would likely create a radical jihadist state in Damascus and lead to massacres and mass refugee movements.

But Russia means what it says and will now use its military capabilities to confront the U.S. plans:

Elijah J. Magnier
#Russia is providing #Syria with precision military and destructive equipment. #Russia will start soon operating n #Syria sky to hit rebels+
The participation of the #Russian Air Force in #Syria worries #Israel that won';t be able to have a free sky to hit Syrian troops.+

This is THE major change in #Russia approach and support to #Damascus regime, to prevent game change on the ground in #Syria +

The decision of #Russia comes mainly from regional support 2rebels, not satisfy w/ d north f #Syria (#Idlib) and aiming to #Hama & #Damascus

Russian air-support for Syria against the various forces attacking the state will allow for additional air attacks against those forces. The Syrian air force is today already flying more than 100 sorties per day against it enemies. The Russian forces will add to that but not necessarily in a decisive amount.

The main support for Syria by Russian air assets will come by keeping away those foreign air forces forces that threaten the Syrian government under disguise of "fighting terror". With Russian fighters in Syrian skies Israel will no longer be able to use its air force in support of Jabhat al-Nusra (and for its oil stealing endeavors in the Syrian Golan heights).

The U.S., Britain, France and others announced to enter Syrian skies to "fight the terror" of the Islamic State. Russia will use just the same claim to justify its presence and its air operations flying from Latakia. Simply by being there it will make sure that others will not be able to use their capabilities for more nefarious means. Additional intelligence from Russian air assets will also be helpful for Syrian ground operations.

The Russian air capabilities will be supplemented with air defense cover from Russian naval assets on the Syrian coast. Russia announced several air defense drills with live missile launches off the Syrian coast near Tartus. New land based air defense assets are said to be on their way. I would not be surprised to see, over time, some Chinese naval assets joining the Russian presence.

Secretary of State Kerry whined to Russia that its intervention in Syria might intervene with the U.S. intervention in Syria. Well, yes sir, that is the sole purpose:

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Friday coordination was needed between Russia's military and the Pentagon to avoid "unintended incidents" around Syria, where both countries have a military presence.
Lavrov said Russia would continue to supply weapons to Syrian President Bashar Assad to help the Syrian armed forces fight against ISIS militants.

He told a news conference Russia was conducting military exercises in the Mediterranean Sea, that it had been for some time, and that they were in line with international law.

The neoconned State Department childishly pressured Greece and Bulgaria to disallow Russian military air transport over their countries. But Russian planes can just as well fly via Iran and Iraq and both countries are very unlikely to ever block such flights. As Russian ground forces will not be involved in any fighting the supply needs can be kept limited.

Any attempt by Turkey, pressured by State Department lunatics, to block the Bosporus sea route between Russia and Syria would be in breach of the Montreux Convention and could be interpreted as hostile act against Russia on which Turkey depends for a large amount of its energy supplies. After losing control over the predominantly Kurdish south-eastern city Cizre Turkey also has to take care of its own civil war which Erdogan foolishly ignited to regain a parliamentarian majority. That internal war will hinder resupplies for the Islamic State through Turkey.

The U.S. plan to use the fight against the Islamic State as cover to remove the Syrian government is now in tatters. The months long U.S. supported "Southern Front" attack in south Syria failed to make any gains against the government. The Islamic State attack against Syrian government forces in Deir ez-Zor was repelled and further moves against Syria in the north will have to defy Russian air power.

Washington will now have to decide to risk war against Russia or to shelf the Syria regime change project.

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2015/09/syria-the-russian-air-cavalry-is-coming-.html#comments

Some facts:


In 2013, the Russians and Chinese vetoed a proposed UN resolution to allow America to bomb Syria.

They sent in their navies.

In 2015 the Russians have once again come to the aid of the Syrian regime.

They have now sent in their air force.


For trolls like Insight, Brown Skinned Coward, Jankhan and others, some facts and cold hard reality.


In 2013 the Russians sent in their navy to defend Syria.

In 2015 the Russians have now sent in their air force to defend Syria.

[Insight]

[QUOTE]

Insight = UnknownPrince

The troll above is on my ignore. Since no one even bothers commenting on the multiple threads he opens on the same topic he has come to derail my thread.

Anyway to give an idea of the amount of credibility this Pakistani Taliban supporter has, this is one thread he started a while back:


"Report: Russia turning its back on Syrian regime, not honoring prior agreements"


LOL!

This thread was posted in June

, now it's September and the Taliban supporter (Insight) is posing threads like this:

Russian troops join combat in Syria - sources


Insight in June: Russia is turning its back on Syria.

Insight in September: Russia is sending soldiers to fight in Syria.

LOL @Bengal_Tiger for proving what a Russian propagandist you are.


The Laugh is on you. You actually have just proved how factual and credible I am. It's called posting a news article whether or not I like what I read (who actually likes Russian invasion of Syria??). You know news? (btw I give educated opinions and not propaganda verbal assaults like you). Unlike you I don't cherry pick articles that only get you aroused like the one on Russian aggression in Syria.

BUT again you are trying to change the topic and not answering my questions on your Russian and Iranian heroes not defending Assad/Iranian troops from Israeli airstrikes.

1) You have FAILED to prove that China is giving military support to the Assad regime! Im still waiting. I don't want maybes and ifs.

2) you claimed that China will go to war for Assad regime if the regime is threatened, yet failed to explain why China didn't defend Assad and Iranian troops from Israeli airstrikes.

2)YOU HAVE STILL NOT EXPLAINED TO ME WHY RUSSIA AND IRAN DONT DEFEND ASSAD,IRANIAN, AND HEZBOLLAH FROM ISRAELI AIRSTRIKES

Answer the questions.

[Insight]

[MENTION=18150]Brown Skinned Savage[/MENTION] @jankhan

Just keep asking @Bengal_Tiger why Russia and Iran don't defend Assad regime/Iranian troops and Hezbollah from Israeli airstrikes. Russia has been present at Tartus for many years and in Damascus, but they don't defend Assad from Israeli airstrikes.

LOL just because Im pointing this fact out, suddenly he calls me a supporter of Israel.
Syria: Israel kills Iran's Revolutionary Guard general Mohammed Allahdadi in Golan Heights strike

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/syria-israel-kills-irans-revolutionary-guard-general-mohammed-allahdadi-killed-golan-heights-1484092

Why didn't Iran go to war over this? This is a question @Bengal_Tiger that you I have asked you, but you are unable to respond to. Answer it.
Syria: Israeli Jets Bomb Army Facilities Near Damascus Airport

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.630461

Why didn't Russia defend Assad from these airstrikes? They were present at Tartus Naval base and in Damascus, had air defenses. What stopped Russia ? Why didn't Russia go to war to defend Assad like you claim here?

[Bengal_Tiger]

Insight This user is on your Ignore List.

Today 12:19 PM

Insight
This user is on your Ignore List.

Insight a.k.a Unknown Prince stay away from my threads. I will not respond to you or your propaganda or insults anymore as you are a supporter of terrorism, the Taliban terrorist movement which kills and murders Muslims in Afghanistan. You have also insulted me in the past without any provocation.

Bye.

[Bengal_Tiger]

Unread Today, 04:46 PM
Remove user from ignore listInsight
This message is hidden because Insight is on your ignore list.

Stop quoting me.

I don't want to communicate with a terrorist supporter like you.

Plus I know "Islamist" terrorist supporters like you, you are the same types that support Jamaat e "Islami" in Bangladesh (who mass murdered and raped my people in 1971) merely because you think they represent Islam, because they have the label "Islam" in their name.

We are an independent nation now and defeated "Islamist" terrorist animals like you in 1971, and Afghans are doing the same now to Taliban terrorist animals like you, Brown Skinned Coward, Randolph85, Khushal and other animals.

[Insight]

Insight a.k.a Unknown Prince stay away from my threads. I will not respond to you or your propaganda or insults

That is because you are UNABLE TO REPLY TO ME, buddy.

You claim Russia and Iran will defend Assad regime against direct threats. That Russia and Iran will go to war for the Assad regime. Then why did they not go to war after Israeli airstrikes hit Assad troops and Iranian troops in Syria?? Hmm, I know you have no answer with your thumb in your mouth thinking of Putin's thing.

China and Russia will go to nuclear war if need be to protect the Syrian regime.

So I asked you why Russia and Iran have not defended Assad regime and Iranian troops from Israeli airstrikes.

LOL just because Im pointing this fact out, suddenly he calls me a supporter of Israel.
Syria: Israel kills Iran's Revolutionary Guard general Mohammed Allahdadi in Golan Heights strike


https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/syria-isra...eights-1484092

Why didn't Iran go to war over this? This is a question @Bengal_Tiger that you I have asked you, but you are unable to respond to. Answer it.
Syria: Israeli Jets Bomb Army Facilities Near Damascus Airport


http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.630461

Why didn't Russia defend Assad from these airstrikes? They were present at Tartus Naval base and in Damascus, had air defenses. What stopped Russia ? Why didn't Russia go to war to defend Assad like you claim here?

See you CAN'T and are UNABLE to answer it but feel you have the right to fill up this forum with FALSE CLAIMS.

You yourself know that you parrot FALSE STATEMENTS-

anymore as you are a supporter of terrorism, the Taliban terrorist movement which kills and murders Muslims in Afghanistan. You have also insulted me in the past without any provocation.

I didn't know posting news articles means anything. I am non-interventionist. Maybe because you cherry pick stuff and post your own statements praising Russian men, then it does to you

It seems you are very angry now. when you are unable to explain why your Russian, Iranian, and Hezbollah don't respond to Israeli airstrikes against Assad regime and Iranian troops, you go Ad-Hom.


Good job !

[Insight]

Insight a.k.a Unknown Prince stay away from my threads. I will not respond to you or your propaganda or insults

That is because you are UNABLE TO REPLY TO ME, buddy.

You claim Russia and Iran will defend Assad regime against direct threats. That Russia and Iran will go to war for the Assad regime. Then why did they not go to war after Israeli airstrikes hit Assad troops and Iranian troops in Syria?? Hmm, I know you have no answer and have your thumb in your mouth thinking of Putin's thing.

[Insight]

Tough Russian leader Vladimir Putin:

Serious question. Are you a homosexual?

[Bengal_Tiger]

Everyone (i.e. the huge silent international, multi-ethnic guest readership of this highly successful site) please ignore "Insight" (UnknownPrince), who is nothing more than a merely deluded troll, who in June says Russia is abandoning Syria and then in September says Russia is sending its armed forces to Syria.

Insight has also failed to gain any interest in his numerous multiple threads on the same topic and is instead trying to derail mine.

NB: I shouldn't have used the F* word against him earlier as that is inappropriate and wrong.


To bring back some context to this thread I will periodically state what this thread is about, and also an FAQ.


PURPOSE OF THIS THREAD

The purpose of this thread is to highlight the massive cold (or we could even say lukewarm) war between the Sino-Russian axis and the USA.

The prime focal point of this giant cold war between these two rival blocs is Syria.

In the 2000s, post September 11, the American regime went on a rampage, murdering, plundering, destroying including the invasion of several Muslim countries including Afghanistan and Iraq. This orgy of destruction continued until the US went to Libya.

The Americans had promised certain things to the Russians and Chinese in return for their support in the UN, only for the Russians and Chinese to be absolutely shocked at how brazenly the US could lie, when it basically destroyed Libya and instigated the killing of Libyan dictator Gaddafi.



War in Libya.


Libya became China and Russia's "Czechoslovakia".




Czechoslovakia was the country that German dictator Hitler invaded leading to the British & French decision that any future German invasion of any other European country would mean war. In other words where they drew a red line.

After the invasion of Libya, the Sino-Russian axis decided that after American state terrorism in Iraq, Afghanistan and then Libya that they would not accept the invasion of any other major countries by the US.

Syria was never to be allowed to fall, and China and Russia would be prepared to go to nuclear war.

Some may dismiss this but for any objective and reasonable observer there is so much evidence to support this.


"Vladimir Putin saves the world?"

It is alleged that in around the summer of 2013 the US was planning to bomb Syria (as it had done to Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya). This was set.

However suddenly there was a U-turn.

Official western media give various reasons for this.

What certain sources actually say is that the US had actually launched some missiles against Syria but the Russians shot these down with missiles (not known about to the general public) and issued a warning to the Americans, "an attack on Damascus is an attack on Moscow".

The Americans then backed down.





This is quite plausible as the USA though peddling a false narrative of ethically-based foreign policy and altruism for its gullible domestic audience, and propagated by the corporate media which is then swallowed unquestioningly by naive Americans is essentially a very brutal state which operates through intimidation, terrorism and coercion i.e. it is a bully.

Their backing down from military action could only have occured if it was scared of a certain force or a certain threat.

The only source of such a possible threat could either be Russia or China.

In other words the Americans got scared by Russia's reaction and backed down.

Putin's actions in the middle east are said to have prevented a wider conflagration.



Syria a red line for Russia and China.


In 2013 Russia and China sent their navies to back the Syrians and prevent an American attack.


In 2015 the Russians have sent their army in the form of special forces operatives, advisors and others.


This is contrary to the western media propaganda (believed by some ignorant people here to be always true and unquestionable) that Russia was "ditching" Syria.

Russia is under sanctions.

So why is Russia - a country under sanctions - sending its armed forces to a non-white, non-Slavic, non-Orthodox Syria?

Is Syria Orthodox?

No it's mainly Muslim.


Is Syria Slavic?

No they are tanned/brown Arabs.



So why this massive Russian support for these, even in the minds of some of the more Xenophobic elements of Russian society "sand ni*gers"?

Because as I have stated consistently Syria is a red line for the Sino-Russian axis.

Understanding this makes us realize why white Orthodox Slavic Russia along with yello Buddhist/Taoist Han China is behaving like this in Syria.



Syria a prelude to an attack on Iran then Russia and China.


In any Iran v US-Israel conflict, Iran would have retaliated by using its proxy in Lebanon Hizbullah to strike Israel. Hizbullah received support via Iranian ally Syria.

Thus before any attack on Iran could be staged, the ability to attack Israel through its Lebanese surrogate (Hizbullah) had to be removed/disabled, this necessitated the removal of the Syrian regime.

Once Syrian was taken out, then the Iranians could not support Hizbullah and thus the Iranians would be next on the American hit list.






After the Iranians had been taken out the next on the US hit list were Russia and China themselves.

Russia in its older form as the USSR had already been destroyed and dismantled, however the USA wanted the complete destruction and break up of the multi-ethnic Russian federation.

Russia, China and Iran knew that if they did not stop the Americans in Syria, they would all be next.

They had to unite and work together for their very survival.

This is why Russia now has sent major military support to the Assad regime in Syria.


What will happen?

Who knows.

Assad himself is an evil man and a dictator.

Having lived in Syria I can say that most Syrians (who are Sunni) did not like him or his dictatorship which was a police state.

Having said that however he did keep the country relatively stable as opposed to the chaos we see now.

In this thread: Assad a criminal

Post #48, I clearly called Assad a criminal and posted this image.



This was back in November 2013.

However if the US-backed militants take control of Syria then Syria will be destroyed as per US plans as they have done in Libya and now in Iraq which is still not fully stable (e.g. ISIS in Iraq).


If the Iranians do indeed supply massive manpower to keep the Assad regime intact then Assad will probably survive and if they also deter the Saudis and Turks from increasing support for rebels via certain "measures" then it is possible.


I doubt the Russians (at this stage anyway) will send in major deployments of soldiers to fight in Syria and will leave this to Iran and other Shia militiamen from Iraq, Lebanon and even Afghanistan.

There have even been Brazilian Shias of Arab origin who have fought for Assad allies Hizbullah in Syria.



Brazilian Hizbullah fighters in Syria.

There are at least 25 million Shia (probably many times more) in India for example, as well as Azerbaijan, Turkey and elsewhere.


If the Russians prevent the Americans from enacting regime change in Syria, then the Americans have reached the limit of their hegemony and the limits on how much they can mould the world to the way they want to.

This has a huge impact on how the world in general functions including in other parts of the world and in different spheres.

We are basically watching a massive war for the future of the world.

A war which sees the brutal genocidal state that is the USA pitied against the Chinese and Vladimir Putin's Russia.

Millions through out the world will be wishing for Putin to triumph.

[Bengal_Tiger]

Israeli leader to visit Russia


Netanyahu seeks to prevent Israel-Russia clashes in Syria

Israeli PM concerned Russian activity will encroach on possible Israeli airstrikes, allow Hezbollah to rearm

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced plans this week to travel to Moscow on a mission to address Israel's concerns about confrontations that could possibly occur between Israeli troops and Russian forces active in Syria, Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported.

Israel, along with many Western countries has been watching closely as Russia troops, radar systems, and tanks have been arriving in war-torn Syria, adding to the speculation about Russian construction activity at an airfield in Syria's Latakia province.

Netanyahu is expected to arrive in Moscow Monday for a short visit of a few hours. Accompanying him will be a number of key ministers as well as Immigrant Absorption Minister Zeev Elkin, who has previously traveled to Russia with the Prime Minister acting as his translator.




"Vladimir Putin and Benjamin Netanyahu"

Officials in Israel say the focus of Netanyahu's visit to Moscow is to hear from Putin what the purpose, scope and what the time frame for the Russian deployment is expected to be. According to a statement by Netanyahu's office, the purpose of his trip is to "present the threats posed to Israel as a result of the increased flow of advanced war materiel to the Syrian arena and the transfer of deadly weapons to Hezbollah and other terror organizations."

According to Haaretz, Israel's main concern seems to be that the Israeli Air Force's freedom of movement within the area could become restricted by the presence of Russian fighter jets and missile defense systems, and that there could be unplanned encounters between the two sides in the sky.

A number of airstrikes attributed to Israel targeting arms convoys traveling through Syria to Lebanon's extremist militant Hezbollah group would have required Israeli planes flying into Syrian airspace and any run-ins with Russian fighter jets could ultimately lead to the two sides firing at each other, some analysts have worried.


"Israeli air strike in Golan Heights"

Israel's Channel 2 reported that Netanyahu is especially troubled by efforts from both Russia and Iran to reinforce the weakening regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad, who's country has been engrossed by civil war for four years, killing thousands and displacing millions of civilians.

According to Israeli officials, there is already a strong Iranian military presence on Israel's northern border in the Syrian Golan Heights, and many more are said to be on their way.

A statement by the Russian Foreign Ministry released Thursday said that Moscow is not supporting Assad regime, but rather trying to safeguard Syrian statehood in order to avert 'a total catastrophe,' Reuters reported.

http://www.i24news.tv/en/news/international/86073-150917-netanyahu-seeks-to-prevent-israel-russia-clashes-in-syria

- For the past few months middle east rulers and dictators have been flying to Moscow for an audience with the man who rules the largest country on earth, with the largest nuclear arsenal on earth, Vladimir Putin.


Egyptian leader has an audience with Putin.



Last month, in August, the head of the largest country in the Arab world (by population), Sisi of Egypt went to visit president Putin in Moscow.


Abdullah of Jordan flies to Russia to meet Putin.



The leader of the small Arab state of Jordan went to visit Putin.


The UAE also sent one of their top leaders.



Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi with President Putin last month as many Arab leaders have been flocking to Moscow recently



Putin responds with massive escalation of Russian military support to Syria.

Basically Putin told the gulf Arabs and Jordan to f*** off and humiliated them by instead of listening to their pleas to abandon the Assad regime in Syria did the opposite by ordering a massive increase in Russian military support to Syria.

Putin is basically making Syria almost like the Crimea.

Russia regarded Crimea as part of Russia and when the Ukraine crisis broke out, it immediately sent in elite forces and took control.

Putin is now building a giant air force base in Syria which can host 1,000 pilots.


Like the other anti-Assad leaders in the middle east, Israel's Netanyahu is going to Russia on a begging mission to beg Putin to stop supporting Assad, like the Arab leaders he will basically be told to f*** off by Putin.



President Putin with Israel's Netanyahu. The Russian leader will most likely tell the Israeli leader who is going on a begging mission to Russia to get lost. Putin's Russia supports Israel's archenemy Iran in the middle east and is key in getting the removal of sanctions on Iran.


Putin's message to Israel.



"Oh really, you want Russia to stop supporting Syria...?"




"Beat it kid", Putin's essential message to Israeli leader Netanyahu who will be visiting Russia to beg.

[Brown Skinned Savage]

[Bengal_Tiger]

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas expected in Moscow next week

http://news.yahoo.com/palestinian-president-mahmoud-abbas-expected-moscow-next-week-210155337.html

Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas with president Putin.

So next week both Palestinian and Israeli leaders will be going for an audience with president Putin in Russia on separate trips.

Why?

Because everyone knows the Syria conflict revolves around Russia and America and what these two states do.

Russia has made it clear that Syria is a red line and has sent its army there.


From a poster, "Saladin" at the increasingly more famous Syrianperspective.com site:

It has been said quite often, but there is so much dust in the air clouding people's perceptions that it deserves being said again. This war in Syria is being fought because after Israel was badly defeated by Hezbollah in 2006 the zionists and their henchmen made the secret decision to destroy Hezbollah and the resistance axis. For this to happen, it was necessary to defeat Assad and replace his government with one compliant to western interests and submissive to Israel. Thus the creation of the rat mercenary army. When Syria stood fast after three years of intensive attacks, the decision was made to create ISIL. Iran and Hezbollah know the score; they know they are next in line. They will remain steadfast.

Russia also knows that the war will come to their borders. They will not allow Syria to fall. Syria was meant to follow the way of Libya but this time it is different. As most of the readers of this site realize, the significance of what is taking place in Syria is momentous, historic, and of global dimensions. The consequences of this war cannot be over exaggerated. It is really a do or die struggle and we are witnessing unfold what happens when the irresistible force meets the immoveable object. But in fact one side will lose. I would not bet against Putin's Russia and the resistance bloc. The zionist criminals behind this war will not stop either. A greater war is coming unless someone can remove these gangsters from power. One thing is sure -- their time is at hand and the karmic clock is ticking. Payback is coming to them in a big way. Their just reward for their merciless war against humanity will be their own destruction. Count on it.

Read more at http://syrianperspective.com/2015/09...9SvUEsClPF2.99