Putin Orders Massive Strike Against Saudi Arabia If West Attacks Syria

[Shamlawar Khurasani]

^ get your facts right, saudi arabia is not only Makkah/Medina. There are so many other major cities there which have nothing to do with Makkah and Medina, Riyadh and eastern cities are where Saud family/government is from, far away from Makkah/Medina. Makkah/Medina was only conquered by these people which you keep defending all the time, like a typical wahabhi.

Like I said, I really wish someone has the guts to attack the saudi state, preferably a muslim country obviously

Well, Osama Bin Laden and his crew are the ones who started attacking the Saudi state. Do you think that is the way to go?

You prescribe attacking the state of Saudi, but what about Pakistani government? Isn't Pakistan just as bad as Saudi?

If we advocate removal of corrupt regimes in the Muslim lands, why defame those who attack Pakistani state and Afghan so-called state? You should endorse then and praise them for doing that.

[Karachi]

^ I totally support removing pakistani government/military. when have I not? all these corrupt so called Islamic states need to be removed, the only reason I focus more on saudi is because it occupies sacred Islamic lands

[afghan]

no more supporting for extremism and priceless oil

Like every Jew has the on the holy land why Saudi is an exception? It's just a religious monopoly.

[Shamlawar Khurasani]

^ I totally support removing pakistani government/military. when have I not? all these corrupt so called Islamic states need to be removed, the only reason I focus more on saudi is because it occupies sacred Islamic lands

How do you support it? Are you a member of any militant faction.

[Shah-i-Kot]

False news.

So the "rebels" will continue to be defeated by the SAA, Turkey will be careful with messing with Syria as it has already learnt to.

Syria will ultimately defeat the US-backed "rebels" and militants and US as



- Algeria crushed "Islamist" (astaghfirullah for associating Allah's religion with such extremists) fanatics.

In Algeria, the Islamic political party won the parliamentary elections. Similar to what happened in Egypt with the Morsi coup, that government was also forced out of power by the military. "Islamist" (which is a term coined by some Western political theorists) tried democracy, were empowered by it, and then subsequently forced out of their hard won gains. A civil war followed.

- Indonesia crushed extremists.

Indonesia has been ruled by dictators. The dictators simply want to keep power to hold onto their wealth, and work against anything that threatens their hold on power.

- Bangladesh crushed Indian-backed "Islamist" militants.

Are you referring to the recent protests in Bangladesh and the banning of political parties? Is banning a party morally good? Lets talk about economy. Is preventing another group from participating in government good for security and subsequently, economic growth? The answer is no.

- Egypt has crushed the "Muslim" brotherhood.

Egypt Army has put the nation back. It has committed a coup against an elected government/parliament. Egyptian Army has massacred civilian protestors- leading to unrest and predictions of civil war (there is already an insurgency in the Sinai). The more the Egyptian Army kills civilians, the more instability results.

[/QUOTE]

[Karachi]

How do you support it? Are you a member of any militant faction.

why would I be in a militant organization who mostly target innocent people? both are evil ways

for now the only thing one can do is express hatred against which is clearly evil, be it these evil governments or terrorist groups.

[Shabi Khel]

why would I be in a militant organization who mostly target innocent people? both are evil ways

for now the only thing one can do is express hatred against which is clearly evil, be it these evil governments or terrorist groups.

You seem to possess genuine intent so I won't attack or mock you. In all honesty, do you believe that every attack reported on Dawn, GEO news and other Pakistani state media where innocent non combatants were the primary casualties are carried out by the particular mujahideen factions cited in the official report? Are you comfortable that such players as CIA, ISI, Blackwater have never had a hand in any event? Dig deeper.

[Shamlawar Khurasani]

why would I be in a militant organization who mostly target innocent people? both are evil ways

for now the only thing one can do is express hatred against which is clearly evil, be it these evil governments or terrorist groups.

How do you want to invade saudi and overthrow its regime without bloodshed when those who are trying to overthrow pakistani gov are accused of killing innocent people?

You can express your hatred but that does not mean advocating invasion of Muslim lands by Russia.

[asad71]

This is another bakwas report. Part of US Intel Disinfo Campaign to confuse everyone.

[Karachi]

How do you want to invade saudi and overthrow its regime without bloodshed when those who are trying to overthrow pakistani gov are accused of killing innocent people?

You can express your hatred but that does not mean advocating invasion of Muslim lands by Russia.

most bombings take the lives of innocent, not military or government individuals

[Shamlawar Khurasani]

most bombings take the lives of innocent, not military or government individuals

If it is true as you say it is why do you support bloodshed in Saudi?

[Karachi]

^ who is talking about regular people? I am talking about the royals

[Tiger Khan]

^ I totally support removing pakistani government/military. when have I not? all these corrupt so called Islamic states need to be removed, the only reason I focus more on saudi is because it occupies sacred Islamic lands

Well its how you look at Mecca and Medina, They are holy cities yes. But they belong to the people that live there i.e. the arabians. Why would or should they give control of mecca and medina to any non native??!!. Better yet why sould tthe control of these cities be given to any pakistani? those are there cities and it is upto them how to manage them. If they are making alot of money from "religeous tourism" good for them.

[Tiger Khan]

If it is true as you say it is why do you support bloodshed in Saudi?

Yes, i agree with you. Why blood shed any where?, Muslims have been fighting each other everywhere, they need to calm down. Also what is the objective being acheived by having some country attack saudi arabia?? !!

[Karachi]

Well its how you look at Mecca and Medina, They are holy cities yes. But they belong to the people that live there i.e. the arabians. Why would or should they give control of mecca and medina to any non native??!!. Better yet why sould tthe control of these cities be given to any pakistani? those are there cities and it is upto them how to manage them. If they are making alot of money from "religeous tourism" good for them.

I never said give to pakistanis, pakistanis are known for their mismanagement and corruption, they will ruin the place. I think arabs should remain the caretakers of the place, however not the Saud family, because they are western puppets and slaves of the west. Some one who is a legitimate muslim/arab should take care of the place. It is common sense