Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

US-Iranian nuclear talks fail. Iran has plutonium for 24 Nagasaki-type bombs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • US-Iranian nuclear talks fail. Iran has plutonium for 24 Nagasaki-type bombs

    http://www.debka.com/article/22616/U...aki-type-bombs


    US-Iranian nuclear talks fail. Iran has plutonium for 24 Nagasaki-type bombs

    DEBKAfile Special Report December 15, 2012, 12:03 PM (GMT+02:00) Tags: Iran nuclear plutonium Barack Obama negotiations


    Fatman: Implosion-type nuke

    The secret, one-on-one nuclear negotiations President Barack Obama launched with Iran have run into a blank wall. A senior Iranian team member, Mostafa Dolatyar, said Friday, Dec. 14 in New Delhi that the diplomatic process for solving the nuclear issue with Iran was in effect going nowhere, because the demand that Tehran halt its 20-percent enrichment of uranium “doesn’t make sense.”
    He went on to say: “They [the world powers] have made certain connections with purely technical issues and something purely political. In so far as this is the mentality and this is the approach from 5 + 1 (the Six World Powers) - or whatever else you call it - definitely there is no end for this game.”
    debkafile: The phrase “or whatever else you call it” may be taken as Iran’s first veiled reference to the direct talks with Washington that were launched Dec. 1 in the Swiss town of Lausanne.
    Mostafa Dolatyar is not just a faceless official. He is head of the Iranian foreign ministry’s think tank, the Institute for Political and International Studies, as well as a senior member of the Iranian team facing US negotiators in Lausanne. His remarks were undoubtedly authorized by the office of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei who, through him, posted a message to Washington: If the enrichment suspension demand stands, the game’s over.
    After more than 15 years of on-and-off, largely aimless, nuclear diplomacy with world powers and evasive tactics with the UN nuclear agency, Tehran is for the first time showing signs of impatience and not just is usual disdain. This is because two things have changed:
    1. For all those years, Tehran availed itself of every diplomatic opening for protracted bargaining about its nuclear program for the sake of buying time, free of pressure, to push that program forward. Now, the Iranians are telling the US and Europe that they have arrived at their destination. For them, time is no longer of essence, as it may be for the West.
    2. The second development was revealed on Dec. 5 by The Wall Street Journal in a short leader captioned “From Bushehr to the Bomb.” This revelation was not picked up by any other Western - or even Israeli - publication despite its sensational nature.
    Drawing on US intelligence sources, the paper suggested that the withdrawal of 136 fuel rods from Iran’s nuclear reactor at Bushehr in mid-October – on the pretext of wandering metal bolts – and the rods’ return in the last week of November “could have been a test run for the Iranians should they decide to reprocess those rods into weapons-grade plutonium.”
    American, Russian and Israeli nuclear experts have always maintained that the technology for extracting plutonium from fuel rods was too expensive and complicated to be practical - and certainly beyond Iran’s capacity.
    The Wall Street Journal begs to differ: “…experts tell us that the rapid extraction of weapons-usable plutonium from spent fuel rods is a straightforward process that can be preformed in a fairly small (and easily secreted) space.”
    This means that Tehran can easily manufacture plutonium bombs without building a large plutonium reactor like the one under construction at Arak.
    The paper goes on to reveal that, by this method, Iran could extract 220 pounds (just under 100 kilos) of plutonium, enough to produce as many as “24 Nagasaki-type bombs” – a reference to the World War II bombing of the Japanese city on Aug. 9, 1945.
    One of those bombs – nicknamed “Fat Man” (after Winston Churchill) – is equal to 20 kilotons.
    debkafile’s military and intelligence sources note that if this disclosure represents the true state of Iran’s nuclear program, the game really is over. The diplomacy-cum-sanctions policy pursued by the West to force Iran to abandon enrichment and shut down its underground facility in Fordo has become irrelevant. So, too, have the red lines Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu drew so graphically before the UN Assembly on September 27.
    What Mostafa Dolatyar was saying in effect is that Iran has outplayed its adversaries up to the game’s finishing line.

  • #2
    Iran negotiator says not optimistic on nuclear talks with West


    • Tweet
    • Share this
    • Email
    • Print





    Related News







    Analysis & Opinion







    Related Topics










    Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:07am EST

    * Iran open to inspection of military complex, with conditions
    * Negotiator says U.S. putting pressuring IAEA
    * Sees no reason for Iran to stop enriching uranium
    By Nidhi Verma and Frank Jack Daniel
    NEW DELHI, Dec 14 (Reuters) - A member of Iran's nuclear negotiation team said talks between Iran and world powers were unlikely to yield results and it makes no sense for Tehran to stop enriching uranium to 20 percent fissile purity.
    "Personally speaking, I am not optimistic," Mostafa Dolatyar told reporters at the Iranian embassy in New Delhi on Friday.
    "They have made certain connections with purely technical issues and something purely political. As far as this is the mentality and this is the approach from 5+1 or whatever else you call it, definitely there is no end for this game."
    Britain, France, Germany, United States, Russia and China, a group known as P5+1, are hopeful of setting dates with Iran to continue talks, a spokesman for EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, who oversees contacts with the Islamic Republic on behalf of the six countries, said on Wednesday.
    'MOUSE AND CAT GAME'
    Dolatyar said Iran was open to an inspection of its Parchin military complex by the U.N. atomic agency, but said there was still disagreement about the framework for such a visit, especially the amount of time inspectors would be allowed.
    "This is possible, as we did several times before. But if they want do it as a mouse and cat game of course it is not possible," he said.
    He accused the United States of putting political pressure on the International Atomic Energy Agency to obstruct progress.
    The agency's meetings with Iran are separate from but closely linked to broader efforts by six world powers to resolve the nuclear dispute.
    The IAEA failed to gain access to the military site in talks with Iran on Thursday but expects to reach a deal in January to resume its stalled nuclear investigation, the chief U.N. inspector said after returning from Tehran on Friday.
    The Vienna-based U.N. agency believes Iran has conducted explosives tests with possible nuclear applications at Parchin, southeast of Tehran, and has repeatedly asked for access.
    Iran says Parchin is a conventional military site and has dismissed allegations that it has tried to clean up the site before any visit.
    Dolatyar is a career diplomat who heads the Iranian foreign ministry's Institute for Political and International Studies and is a member of the nuclear negotiation team.
    He said Iran talked to the United States through different channels of communication, and said Iran was waiting to see Washington's approach in the second administration of President Barack Obama.
    "We have to see the signals and the indications. I don't see yet any indications, just talks," he said.
    The six countries are particularly concerned about Iran enriching uranium to 20 percent fissile purity, an important technological advance that brings it significantly closer to the threshold of weapons-grade material.
    Dolatyar said Iran needed the fuel for its research reactor in Tehran and for medical purposes and could not rely on the international community to supply it. He said Iran was now enriching uranium between 20 and 22 percent fissile purity.
    "One year ago we needed it very much, we were ready to pay cash for it but now we now have it. Why should we close our installations and to buy from somewhere else? It is not logical."
    However, he did not rule out a change of position.
    "You cannot take something as predecided, everything could be subject to negotiation," he said. "It depends on the framework of negotiations and the end game."
    50 PERCENT URANIUM?
    Dolatyar also appeared to allude to Iran's announcement in July that it was in the preliminary stages of developing an nuclear submarine. He said Iran would enrich 50 percent uranium for peaceful and civilian purposes if it needed and supplies were not available from international sources.
    "If the Iranian navy wants to change its vessels, which want to go to the Indian Ocean and beyond, instead of conventional fuel, it will use for example a small reactor."
    He said Iran did not currently need to enrich uranium to such a level and reiterated that the nuclear program was entirely peaceful.
    "For many reasons, theoretical, religious and practical reasons, there is no place whatsoever in Iranian defence doctrine for nuclear weapons."


    https://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/14/nuclear-iran-dolatyar-idUSL5E8NE9PI20121214

    Comment

    Working...
    X