Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Shooting at Connecticut Sandy Hook Elementary School

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 12
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 template Next
  • #136
    Originally posted by Shah-i-Kot View Post
    Sorry, It is not my job to look for this mysterious source of yours that doesnt show up in your link that just shows that you typed "Abdali Hindu Women."

    This is not some game.

    Quote the source right here. Thats your job. I still need multiple sources.

    You are a funny man.
    Anyway check later

    hahaha that's what they call evasion; I posted a screen shot that it's on there.

    Fair enough ...this is conceding ...you conceded by using Ad-Hominem fallacy anyways ...I warned you about that
    [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

    2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

    Comment

    • #137
      Originally posted by Shah-i-Kot View Post
      Again, I need MULTIPLE AND AUTHENTIC SOURCES.

      Not some HINDU author who is grinding his axe.


      Ad-Hominem fallacy.

      Just a moment...
      http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/ad-hominem.html


      Description of Ad Hominem

      Translated from Latin to English, "Ad Hominem" means "against the man" or "against the person."

      An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument. Typically, this fallacy involves two steps. First, an attack against the character of person making the claim, her circumstances, or her actions is made (or the character, circumstances, or actions of the person reporting the claim). Second, this attack is taken to be evidence against the claim or argument the person in question is making (or presenting). This type of "argument" has the following form:

      Person A makes claim X.
      Person B makes an attack on person A.
      Therefore A's claim is false.

      your refutation is logically false; therefore the sources have not been shown to lack credibility.
      [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

      2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

      Comment

      • #138
        What makes Judanath Sarkar so credible? seems biased to me.
        ----------

        *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

        Originally posted by Karachi
        like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

        Comment

        • #139
          Originally posted by Manzareh View Post
          What makes Judanath Sarkar so credible? seems biased to me.


          what makes him not credible ...and don't say because he's a Hindu ..that is a logical fallacy.
          [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

          2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

          Comment

          • #140
            Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
            what makes him not credible ...and don't say because he's a Hindu ..that is a logical fallacy.
            lol

            he is your father

            Comment

            • #141
              Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
              what makes him not credible ...and don't say because he's a Hindu ..that is a logical fallacy.
              for this fool these are credible sources.

              any source that has anti Afghan agenda is good source for him.

              his NO1 source is Afghanprofile.com
              Last edited by ډګروال; 12-19-2012, 10:17 AM.

              Comment

              • #142
                Originally posted by Manzareh View Post
                What makes Judanath Sarkar so credible? seems biased to me.
                We dont really know what Judanath Sarkar is saying, we are only shown bits and pieces. This is called quote mining, its a strategy only to quote certain parts to make RTR seem he is right. He is leaving out the evidence which would doubt his accusations.
                I have not read this book but it seems the author is saying that marathas newletter were reporting such things. There is no such confirmation of such things happening by primary sources. That is why the best he could do is show a book that has bits and pieces otherwise there would have been other sources confirming such things. He cant find it.

                His inability to win arguments have transformed him into a mentally ill fool.

                Comment

                • #143
                  Originally posted by ډګروال View Post
                  for this fool these are credible sources.

                  any source that is has anti Afghan agenda is good source for him.

                  his NO1 source is Afghanprofile.com


                  How do you know it is "anti-Afghan" ?
                  [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                  2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                  Comment

                  • #144
                    Originally posted by khushal View Post
                    We dont really know what Judanath Sarkar is saying, we are only shown bits and pieces. This is called quote mining, its a strategy only to quote certain parts to make RTR seem he is right. He is leaving out the evidence which would doubt his accusations.
                    I have not read this book but it seems the author is saying that marathas newletter were reporting such things. There is no such confirmation of such things happening by primary sources. That is why the best he could do is show a book that has bits and pieces otherwise there would have been other sources confirming such things. He cant find it.

                    His inability to win arguments have transformed him into a mentally ill fool.


                    Untrue ....that's all I could get from the preview available; If I had the books I'd copy them, but regardless I showed where I got the evidence, so that is sufficient.

                    But the quote mining would only be true if I was deliberately leaving out the other parts of the quotes.
                    [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                    2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                    Comment

                    • #145
                      Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
                      How do you know it is "anti-Afghan" ?
                      how do you know its not?

                      Comment

                      • #146
                        Originally posted by ډګروال View Post
                        lol

                        he is your father


                        Every man in Islamabad is your father, they had to draw a lottery ticket when you were given birth to
                        [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                        2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                        Comment

                        • #147
                          Originally posted by ډګروال View Post
                          how do you know its not?

                          You made the claim, the burden of proof is on you.
                          [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                          2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                          Comment

                          • #148
                            Originally posted by ډګروال View Post
                            for this fool these are credible sources.

                            any source that has anti Afghan agenda is good source for him.

                            his NO1 source is Afghanprofile.com
                            Dont attack the author because of his affiliation with a certain religion or group. Question the evidence that the author is presenting. WE dont really know what the author is presenting because its in bits and pieces. For all we know he could be saying he had a dream about such things happening. WE need to see all of what the author is saying and what evidence he is presenting to back up such things. Without evidence, what he says is meaningless.

                            Comment

                            • #149
                              Originally posted by khushal View Post
                              seems the author is saying that marathas newletter were reporting such things. There is no such confirmation of such things happening by primary sources.
                              See you're interpolating, where does it indicate it's from a Maratha newsletter? They didn't have "newsletters" back then.
                              [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                              2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                              Comment

                              • #150
                                Originally posted by khushal View Post
                                Dont attack the author because of his affiliation with a certain religion or group. Question the evidence that the author is presenting. WE dont really know what the author is presenting because its in bits and pieces. For all we know he could be saying he had a dream about such things happening. WE need to see all of what the author is saying and what evidence he is presenting to back up such things. Without evidence, what he says is meaningless.

                                Ok that's a fair criticism; but I presented sources, so this is sufficient for now. I didn't just pull them out of the air.

                                So if you have access to the original source itself, which I don't sadly, please post the full page, a scanned copy would suffice.. However I think this is legitimate and that they do use primary sources because ALL secondary sources seem to be saying the same things.
                                Last edited by RevolutionThroughReason; 12-19-2012, 10:28 AM.
                                [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                                2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 template Next
                                Working...
                                X