Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Housing apartheid flourishes in Delhi

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Housing apartheid flourishes in Delhi



    Finding a home to rent in India's national capital is an arduous task for anyone - but, an investigation by The Hindu has found, almost impossible for citizens who happen to be Muslim. Homeowners and property dealers contacted by reporters often firmed up deals, only to be disqualified as soon as they revealed their religion.
    Housing apartheid was at its worst in New Delhi’s most affluent and educated neighbourhoods: New Friends Colony, Vasant Kunj, Jangpura and Rohini. By contrast, in areas such as Mukherjee Nagar, Karol Bagh, Janakpuri and Ashok Vihar the responses were mixed.
    In one case, a property agent representing a homeowner in New Friends Colony flatly told The Hindu's reporters, “The landlords want only Indians, not Muslims.”
    Told that the applicant was an Indian, the reporter was told not to push matters further. “Another Muslim,” said Radha of Gulshan properties in New Friends Colony, “wanted to take the flat on rent but he was also refused by the owners. Even though it suits your budget and needs, there is no point in showing you the flat. The flat has been vacant for a long time but they will not give it to a Muslim.”
    Deepak Sharma of Balaji Properties in Rohini Sector-8, contacted by The Hindu's reporters, who posed as a young Muslim married couple, said that residents of mainly-Hindu Rohini “avoid renting their flats to Muslims here. I am sorry but you will not be able to get a house in this locality.” Ironically enough, Mr. Sharma’s office proudly displayed a photograph bearing icons of all religions, in perfect harmony.
    For single women, things are even worse. When a reporter posed as a single mother looking for a house in West Delhi’s Janakpuri, an agent of Sharma properties was initially sympathetic. “You don’t have a husband?” said a property dealer, adding in a conciliatory tone “Ok, come tomorrow and I will find you a house.”
    This changed as soon as she revealed that she is a Muslim who eats non-vegetarian food. “It could get a little difficult then,” he said, “I will call you back after speaking to the owner.”
    By contrast, there were considerable options for a female student looking for accommodation in Delhi’s North Campus with brokers even looking out for the safety of their clients. “There is an option for a one-bedroom apartment but it won’t suit a girl since the entry is from the back of the house,” property dealer Varun Kumar said. Men looking for accommodation in the area say that single girls are preferred as tenants since they can be reined in with threats of complaints to their parents.
    Property dealers seemed to operate an informal network of religious segregation, often pointing The Hindu's reporters to supposedly Muslim-appropriate neighbourhoods. More often that not, they were told to look for houses in the fringes of posh colonies. Property dealers in Rohini suggested Rithala, one in Jangpura proposed Bhogal, famous for its Kashmiri population and Afghanistani refugees, a broker in New Friends Colony suggested Sukhdeo Vihar and Jasola both of which are close to another Muslim ‘ghetto’ Jamia Nagar, and one in Vasant Kunj suggested Munirka and Kishangadh.
    Neighbourhoods like these appear to be emerging as enclaves for the growing Muslim middle class in Delhi, which despite its education and economic achievements is denied access to neighbourhoods preferred by Hindus from similar backgrounds.
    On the travails of finding a house, Prof. Rizwan Qaisar, an academician at Jamia Millia Islamia, said while looking for a house in Saket and Munirka DDA Flats he came across instances where his name mattered a lot. “Every thing was fine till I revealed my name. After facing ‘no’ from several property dealers, I had to finally shift to Noor Nagar in Jamia Nagar.” “Several social groups face discrimination in housing but for Muslims the edge is sharper,” Mr. Qaisar said.
    Senior lawyer Ashok Agarwal said a solution to the problem does not lie in the legal sphere. “First of all, practically it is very difficult to prove the existence of this malaise,” he said, adding, “the government cannot regulate private housing.”
    Elsewhere in the region, countries have taken concerted action to end similar housing apartheid. Singapore, for example, introduced a system of mandatory quotas in public housing to better integrate its once-polarised ethnic-Malay, Chinese and Indian communities.
    Interestingly, one property dealer said, Dalits sometimes faced similar problems — but managed to avoid them since their names often did not immediately disclose their caste. “Dalits face some problems when the owner is typically a practicing upper caste Hindu or Jain,” the dealer said. Not every neighbourhood is exclusionary — perhaps a sign of hope that change is possible in the city. There are those who are honest about not caring where in the world one comes from.
    There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

    Sayyid Qutb

  • #2
    Thats what you get when your so called muslim borthers blows up hotels in big citys in the name of Allah. Thank the extremist for making muslim name bad so now everyone hates us and dicriminates us.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thats what you get when your so called muslim borthers blows up hotels in big citys in the name of Allah. Thank the extremist for making muslim name bad so now everyone hates us and dicriminates us.
      maybe the muslim brother blew up , because he was discriminated and hated ???

      Comment


      • #4


        There are many such Muslim only housing societies too.

        Biggest reason is different food habits. Hindus revere cows. Muslims eat them.
        Last edited by drona; 08-31-2012, 10:47 AM.
        Vande Mataram - Lata Mangeshkar - YouTube

        Comment


        • #5
          What a pity. India claims to be a Super Power already. Claims to be the largest Democracy in the world. Claims to be even a larger Secularist country. Delhi was built by the Muslims who has been living here for a thousand years. Not only has this been a Muslim capital, this has been center of Islamic heritage in SA.

          Comment


          • #6
            Biggest reason is different food habits. Hindus revere cows. Muslims eat them.
            Looool... I have to admit, that would hurt so much... No offense to anyone, of course..

            I am no bird, and no nest ensnares me.

            non commercial would cost less if he was in charge himself which he plans on doing. right now it's n herat but soon it will be in qanadahar.

            Comment


            • #7
              Former Indian minister handed 28-year sentence for her role in bloody 2002 riots

              A Gujarat court today handed down harsh sentences to 32 people for their role in bloody riots in which some 2,000 people, mostly Muslims, were killed in 2002. As the convicts were led from the court, one weeping woman stood out in a crowd of people wailing and clutching at the hands of relatives. Mayaben Surendrabhai Kodnani, sentenced to 28 years for murder and conspiracy to murder, is a former cabinet minister in the state government.

              She is also a woman – and a physician, an obstetrician-gynaecologist who once had a thriving practice delivering babies at an Ahmedabad maternity hospital she founded. She held the position of Minister of Women and Child Development in the Gujarat government. She came to court to hear her fate in a silk saree and a string of pearls.

              For a fascinated Indian public, it was a difficult image to reconcile with the one witnesses described to the court: Ms. Kodnani as a hollering Hindu nationalist who doled out swords and jugs of kerosene to the crowd that gathered outside the Muslim neighbourhood of Naroda Patiya on February 28, 2002, and exhorted them to chop and kill.

              Ninety-eight people, including many children, were hacked to death or burnt alive at Naroda Patiya, the court found.

              Whether women are less likely than men to commit acts of violence is the sort of question that can preoccupy an evolutionary biology or neurophysiology seminar for much of an afternoon.

              In India, in any case, women are less frequent participants in public occurrences of all kinds, and Ms. Kodnani is the only woman charged with murder in relation to the events of 2002. She is also the sole physician among the hundreds of people who have been indicted in various courts in the decade since the killings.

              But while Ms. Kodnani was one of the few women on the streets in 2002, numerous human rights reports – and a series of videos made by an undercover reporter for the investigative news organization Tehelka – found widespread female approval of the events, and that many women encouraged the male members of their families to participate in the carnage, exhorting them to kill and rape.

              Ms. Kodnani is the highest-placed official to be convicted for her role, although human rights organizations have documented the role of her right-wing Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government in tacitly permitting and even encouraging the killings.

              “This is the first time that a judgment has implicated the political class – truth has won,” said Teesta Setalvad, a prominent activist working on the Gujarat issue, told reporters at the courthouse when Ms. Kodnani was convicted on Wednesday.

              The Special Investigative Team that made the case against Ms. Kodnani said last year that it did not have sufficient evidence to bring a case against the head of that government, Chief Minister Narendra Modi, who has long denied his complicity.

              The BJP tried to distance itself from Ms. Kodnani after her conviction. “Kodnani was not a minister when the incident happened,” said Gujarat government spokesperson Jai Narayan Vyas. “We are not denying she is an MLA from the party now. But an MLA is not a state government functionary … you can’t link everything to the party.”

              But Harsh Mander, who heads the Centre for Equity Studies and has been one of the most dogged activists attempting to hold government accountable for its role in the killings, scorned that defence. “It’s even worse: Maya Kodnani was spoken about from the very start, she was leading at Naroda Patiya, there was no doubt, and the most outrageous thing is that after all of this, she was appointed as a minister,” he said. “The absence of remorse – it’s rewarding someone who openly led a massacre.”

              Although the special court in Gujarat has now repeatedly rejected the Modi government’s assertion that the riots were spontaneous, saying they were clearly pre-planned, Mr. Modi remains one of the country’s most popular politicians.

              His fortunes do not seem likely to be appreciably dented by this verdict – a survey of 9,000 people in 28 cities (released Thursday although conducted before the verdict) found 42 per cent of those surveyed identified him as their preferred choice for prime minister in the next government; the likely candidate of the ruling Indian National Congress, Rahul Gandhi, had the endorsement of only 26 per cent of those surveyed.

              Ms. Kodnani, 53, is a three-time member of Gujarat’s assembly. Her parents came to India from the Sindh region of what is now Pakistan in partition in 1947 and were both members of Hindu-nationalist organizations. Ms. Kodnani herself joined one as a young woman.

              She went into local politics for the BJP 20 years ago, and rose swiftly up party ranks. She was said to be a powerful speaker, and a charismatic leader of populist protests over issues such as demolition of illegally-constructed Hindu temples. She is married to another doctor, and they have one child, a son, who is pursuing post-secondary education in the United States, according to local media.

              Throughout her career, Ms. Kodnani was often the first woman to hold each post she attained, such as BJP president in the Gujarati capital. She was re-elected by a wide margin after the riots, and appointed to cabinet in 2007.

              Her defence was that she was not at Naroda Patiya on the day of the killings, but her cellphone records said otherwise, as did 11 eyewitnesses who testified in the court.

              Comment


              • #8
                ^
                Good that Indian courts have delivered a strong verdict against these animals. Just one problem:
                bloody riots in which some 2,000 people, mostly Muslims, were killed in 2002.
                I don't know from where they pulled this figure. 790 Muslims and 254 Hindus were killed. If we include the event which triggered these riots - the burning alive of 58 Hindu pilgrims -then the total body count of Hindus reaches 312.
                Vande Mataram - Lata Mangeshkar - YouTube

                Comment

                Working...
                X