Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

U.S. and Gulf Allies Pursue a Missile Shield Against Iranian Attack

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • U.S. and Gulf Allies Pursue a Missile Shield Against Iranian Attack

    U.S. and Gulf Allies Pursue a Missile Shield Against Iranian Attack

    By THOM SHANKER

    Published: August 8, 2012


    WASHINGTON — The United States and its Arab allies are knitting together a regional missile defense system across the Persian Gulf to protect cities, oil refineries, pipelines and military bases from an Iranian attack, according to government officials and public documents.




    Follow @nytimesworld for international breaking news and headlines.
    Twitter List: Reporters and Editors



    It is an enterprise that is meant to send a pointed message to Tehran, and that becomes more urgent as tensions with Iran rise. But it will require partner nations in the gulf to put aside rivalries, share information and coordinate their individual arsenals of interceptor missiles to create a defensive shield encompassing all the regional allies.
    Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, among the first to raise the need for the missile shield three years ago, sought to spur the gulf allies on during a recent visit to Saudi Arabia.
    “We can do even more to defend the gulf through cooperation on ballistic missile defense,” she said during a session in March of the Gulf Cooperation Council, which includes Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
    “Sometimes to defend one nation effectively you might need a radar system in a neighboring nation,” she said, adding, “But it’s the cooperation — it’s what they call ‘interoperability’ — that we now need to really roll up our sleeves and get to work on.”
    That would include deploying radars to increase the range of early warning coverage across the Persian Gulf, as well as introducing command, control and communications systems that could exchange that information with missile interceptors whose triggers are held by individual countries.
    For that purpose, the Pentagon late last year announced a contract for the sale of two advanced missile defense radars to the United Arab Emirates. And early this year, officials disclosed that a similar high-resolution, X-band missile defense radar would be located in Qatar, as well.
    The objective in the gulf is shared by a more widely publicized missile defense shield being installed in Europe: to deter any Iranian attack and, if required, to blunt the effect of missiles launched against allied territory and American forces.
    But the similarities end there. The administration’s European initiatives have been embraced by NATO and are being put into place after formal negotiations with countries that will host early warning radars, ground-based interceptors and Navy warships equipped to track ballistic missiles and shoot them down.
    In contrast, the Persian Gulf effort is mostly behind the scenes — and on a country-by-country basis — with billions of dollars in arms sales negotiated bilaterally between the United States and nations in the region. Thus, the next challenge is coaxing gulf nations to put aside their rivalries and share early warning radar data, and then integrate the capabilities of their unilateral missile interceptor systems to extend defenses over the entire region.
    While officials would not provide a full list of the weapons sales, a study of the public record — Defense Department contract announcements, foreign arms transfer notifications required by law and studies conducted for Congress — offered a detailed picture of the American initiatives.
    If the planned European missile defense system is growing from a full engineering blueprint, the approach in the Persian Gulf is more like assembling a jigsaw puzzle. And with the latest arms sales, important pieces are coming together that, when connected, will bring toward fruition a project that American officials have pursued for years.
    Three weeks ago the Pentagon announced the newest addition to Persian Gulf missile defense systems, informing Congress of a plan to sell Kuwait $4.2 billion in weaponry, including 60 Patriot Advanced Capability missiles, 20 launching platforms and 4 radars. This will be in addition to Kuwait’s arsenal of 350 Patriot missiles bought between 2007 and 2010.
    The United Arab Emirates acquired more than $12 billion in missile defense systems in the past four years, documents show. In December, the Pentagon announced a contract to provide the Emirates with two advanced missile defense launchers for a system called the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, valued at about $2 billion, including radars and command systems. An accompanying contract to supply an arsenal of interceptor missiles for the system was valued at another $2 billion, according to Pentagon documents.
    Saudi Arabia also has bought a significant arsenal of Patriot systems, the latest being $1.7 billion in upgrades last year.
    The United States’ own military forces provide a core capability for ballistic missile defenses in the Persian Gulf, in particular the American Navy vessels with advanced tracking radars and interceptor missiles. According to Navy officials, these Aegis missile defense systems, carried aboard both cruisers and destroyers, are in the region on continuous deployments.
    And the United States has deployed a number of land-based missile defense systems to defend specific American military facilities located around the gulf.
    Even so, the challenges to creating an integrated regional missile defense system are both technological and political.
    On the technical side, no missile defense system can promise 100 percent effectiveness. And the task is made more difficult by the fact that the capability emerging in the Persian Gulf is more ad hoc than the carefully designed architecture for Europe. Also, Iran is increasing both the type and number of missiles it is fielding.
    Political challenges stem from historic rivalries, prompting the Persian Gulf partner nations to enhance their security through bilateral relationships with the United States. And while all six members of the Gulf Cooperation Council share concerns over Iran, all have resisted multilateral security initiatives.
    Kitty Bennett contributed reporting.




  • #2
    idiot iranians should of built good relations with the gulf arabs in the last 10 years.
    There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

    Sayyid Qutb

    Comment


    • #3
      the question is , would have built the gulf arabs any good relations with the iranians . ?

      one should not underestimate the short leash on which they are and dragged by the americans .

      the only arabs who dared to walk their own way and make their own decisions , well ...

      saddam , ghadaffi ,asad ...

      Comment


      • #4
        gulf arabs are american puppets and Iranians are crazy

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by randolph85 View Post
          idiot iranians should of built good relations with the gulf arabs in the last 10 years.
          lol, the gulf arab countries are american puppets.

          It would have been possible for Iran to build good relations with them if they were free and could make their own decisions but thats not the case.

          Iran has good relations with Syria and Lebanon which are not american puppets and now Egypt.

          Ofcourse Iran is not a saint in all this but it is still better compared to the gulf states.

          Comment


          • #6
            ^^Egypt is still an America puppet. Its foreign policy and military are in control of the foreign imposed puppets and not the egyptian people.

            Comment


            • #7
              Is the attack coming? I dont think Iran would retaliate even when they are bombed. They have no leverage.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by randolph85 View Post
                idiot iranians should of built good relations with the gulf arabs in the last 10 years.
                It tried by supporting Sunni Hamas. It has good relations with Asad, Iraq, lebenon. the others are prevented to do good relations with Iran. The empire wants to keep the region divided.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by khushal View Post
                  It tried by supporting Sunni Hamas. It has good relations with Asad, Iraq, lebenon. the others are prevented to do good relations with Iran. The empire wants to keep the region divided.
                  hamas is not even a player, i am talking about the real players in the region. hamas has already left syria because it is a sinking ship and has aligned with egypt and jordan.

                  iran has good reason to have poor relations with the gulf arabs because of their support of iraq in their war against them. strategically speaking though, iran should swallow its pride, stop supporting shia movements among the arabs and try to rebuild ties.

                  look at the issue of iran occupying uae islands for example, the islands are worthless but iran would rather stir **** rather than have good relations with the uae and by extention the gcc.

                  iran has shown nothing but short sightedness in the last decade. alienate the important arab states, revive a nuclear program while you haven't procured defensive weaponry against an attack, export oil while still importing refined petroleum because they haven't built the facilities to do so.
                  There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

                  Sayyid Qutb

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by randolph85 View Post
                    hamas is not even a player, i am talking about the real players in the region. hamas has already left syria because it is a sinking ship and has aligned with egypt and jordan.

                    iran has good reason to have poor relations with the gulf arabs because of their support of iraq in their war against them. strategically speaking though, iran should swallow its pride, stop supporting shia movements among the arabs and try to rebuild ties.

                    look at the issue of iran occupying uae islands for example, the islands are worthless but iran would rather stir **** rather than have good relations with the uae and by extention the gcc.

                    iran has shown nothing but short sightedness in the last decade. alienate the important arab states, revive a nuclear program while you haven't procured defensive weaponry against an attack, export oil while still importing refined petroleum because they haven't built the facilities to do so.
                    Iran is an independent nation whereas the Gulf Arab states are not independent since they are occupied by US bases, and have illegally imposed regimes in place that support Western policy/wars.

                    End of story.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      and who are the "real players in the region?" Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, Bahrain? These are petrodollar worshiping puppet/satellite states of America, actually one could even say they serve Zion.
                      yes, states are real players.

                      The Gulf Arabs and Saddam started a war with Iran and had the full support of the US/the West.
                      well no ****, hence my post saying iran has reason to have poor relations with them. but while the west supported iraq, they with israel also supported iran so they could destroy each other.

                      This actually really has nothing to do with Sunni-Shiite rift as it is made out to be. Its about the petrodollar.

                      The Gulf Arabs are puppets. Even Morsi has turned out to be Americas new puppet.
                      this has everything to do with sunni vs shia. syria is controlled by shias, hezbollah is shia, and those opposed to them are sunnis. **** is not rocket science.

                      and how is morsi americas puppet? you go from supporting one thing one week to the opposite the next. morsi has the support of 10s of millions of egyptian muslims, what do you have?

                      Its disputed territory.
                      you are missing the point. no **** its disputed territory, hence the dispute. the point is that its worthless territory and it causes a big rift between iran the uae and the gcc. iran holds it out of pride, not out of strategic common sense. if these states were merely puppets, than iran would not accept the invites or visit them. but they do.

                      Iran is an independent nation whereas the Gulf Arab states are not independent since they are occupied by US bases.
                      again, no ****.

                      Since Iran is independent, it gets to do whatever it wants, and that also means pursuing a nuclear program.
                      you are not too bright are you? iran can do whatever it wants, but the question is if it can maintain what it does. what good is a bomb if no countries will buy your oil? what good is developing nukes if you don't have the weaponry to defend against attacks on the program?

                      do you realize iran exports oil while importing refined oil?



                      a few months ago under another sn you were berating iran over them supporting the US, now you are all over their nuts lol.
                      Last edited by randolph85; 08-10-2012, 08:19 PM.
                      There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

                      Sayyid Qutb

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by lynx View Post
                        Iran is an independent nation whereas the Gulf Arab states are not independent since they are occupied by US bases, and have illegally imposed regimes in place that support Western policy/wars.

                        End of story.

                        yet a little while ago you were saying iran is guilty of supporting the NATO war in afghanistan LOL

                        bachem, you are an idiot and out of your league.
                        There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

                        Sayyid Qutb

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by randolph85 View Post
                          yet a little while ago you were saying iran is guilty of supporting the NATO war in afghanistan LOL

                          bachem, you are an idiot and out of your league.
                          When you speak nonsense and are dumbfounded, you detract. First of all, I said Iran should not interfere in Afghanistan by supporting the illegal Karzai regime which is propped up by NATO. They should not, and nor should the Pakis by giving NATO supplies.


                          Now, back to it. Iran is an independent country. The Gulf Arab states are occupied by US bases and have illegal and imposed regimes in place.

                          What they do or say is insignificant as America is their master, and they do what America tells them to do.

                          End of story
                          Last edited by Shah-i-Kot; 08-10-2012, 08:24 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by lynx View Post
                            When you speak nonsense, you detract. First of all, I said Iran should not interfere in Afghanistan by supporting the illegal Karzai regime which is propped up by NATO. They should not.


                            Now, back to it. Iran is an independent country. The Gulf Arab states are occupied by US bases and have illegal and imposed regimes in place.

                            What they do or say is insignificant as America is their master.

                            End of story

                            you also said you were a girl, an indian, and other ridiculous things under your various screen names. you were also banned for harassing the women here.

                            if arab states are not important, than iranian leaders would not visit them, but they have and they do.

                            i love how you an afghan, are all over irans nuts, while the iranian government treats afghans like less than dirt in iran.
                            There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

                            Sayyid Qutb

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by randolph85 View Post
                              you also said you were a girl, an indian, and other ridiculous things under your various screen names. you were also banned for harassing the women here.

                              if arab states are not important, than iranian leaders would not visit them, but they have and they do.

                              i love how you an afghan, are all over irans nuts, while the iranian government treats afghans like less than dirt in iran.
                              Buddy,

                              I dont know what you are talking about.

                              Now, stick to the topic that you have lost.

                              So to you, stating that Iran is independent is a matter of praise? Are you like stupid?

                              Me stating that Iran is independent is not praise. Its a fact dude. Do you use reason when you think or is it all clouded by what you want and desire?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X