Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Secularism kills 12 and injuries 71 in Colorado , EMKhan News Reports

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Your a big waste of time; never do you debunk or logically converse with others. Just love going circles, and blah blah

    I have better reasoning running towards a pipe

    Comment


    • #32
      Says the guy who thinks that not reading the Qur'an literally sends you to hell, but then uses some metaphorical interpretation of the Qur'an to equate baby burial to abortion.

      Perhaps out of pathetic desperation for denial, you have failed to observe that your arguments have been exposed for their logical incoherence with every response. Which demonstrates when reason is present, you wouldn't even have the ability to know it
      Last edited by RevolutionThroughReason; 07-22-2012, 01:15 PM.
      [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

      2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

      Comment


      • #33

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by کیش View Post
          yeah very reasoned response there ......come up with more kooky conspiracy theories and call it "reason"
          [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

          2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

          Comment


          • #35
            Keep responding without attempting to confront the statements to make you seem smart.

            Until you attempt to debunk my first statements, all respond back with an appropriate emoticon.

            Comment


            • #36
              Your first statement was debunked by lacking evidence.....you're a dimwitted conspiracy theorist with a hyper active imagination, and somehow you expect the world to consider that "reason"
              [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

              2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

              Comment


              • #37
                Last edited by کیش; 07-22-2012, 06:37 PM.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
                  The lack of evidence in support of them debunks the statement itself. You did all the work for me. You clearly have not the slightest clue of how reason works.

                  Your challenge is like someone who claims Santa Clause exists, gets laughed at and then claims that others lose because his absurd claim isn't responded to. Learn what reason is first.
                  so is it 'reason' to accuse men of being gay because they disagree with or outwit you you?
                  is it 'reason' to accuse women over being frustrated, oversexed or raped, when they disagree with or outwit you, muttzeal?
                  i can't see too many 'revolutions through reason', being inspired by your representation of your personal religious/philosophical views. they are more than likely the cause of the downfall of the islamic golden age, if what you show us here is how 'reason' is applied.
                  mutazillah throw tantrums when under stress.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
                    Your first statement was debunked by lacking evidence.....you're a dimwitted conspiracy theorist with a hyper active imagination, and somehow you expect the world to consider that "reason"
                    says the fantacist, lol. so, your 'sexual abuse of old women' fantasies, are 'reason'?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by faye View Post
                      says the fantacist, lol. so, your 'sexual abuse of old women' fantasies, are 'reason'?

                      making an idiot like yourself be on this constant search for redemption definitely is reason
                      [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                      2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by faye View Post
                        so is it 'reason' to accuse men of being gay because they disagree with or outwit you you?
                        is it 'reason' to accuse women over being frustrated, oversexed or raped, when they disagree with or outwit you, muttzeal?
                        i can't see too many 'revolutions through reason', being inspired by your representation of your personal religious/philosophical views. they are more than likely the cause of the downfall of the islamic golden age, if what you show us here is how 'reason' is applied.
                        mutazillah throw tantrums when under stress.
                        you avoided answering my questions.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
                          The use of controversial remarks doesn't change reason or rationality; The content of a debate or discourse of a topic is where rationality and logic are applied Anything outside of the context of the debate like insults is perfectly fine and don't compromise reason or rationality. All that intimidation mumbo jumbo is just an excuse you use to over compensate for your incompetence in being able to handle either scenario.
                          your tactics are classified as 'immature ego defence mechanisms'. so all your adult sounding blabbing, about reason, logic etc, are sabotaged by your out of balance hormones mixed with your anger and frustrations.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
                            is this somehow supposed to divert attention away from how much of a massive hypocrite you are by degrading the merits of science and yet shamelessly using its privileges afforded to you regardless? Shows much much conviction you lack.
                            is this pretentious rant an attempt to divert attention from your persitent yapping, muttzeal?

                            you stll crying because i criticised scientists? stop being an extremist scienofascist and get over it. scientists can do stupid and immoral things, too.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by faye View Post
                              your tactics are classified as 'immature ego defence mechanisms'. so all your adult sounding blabbing, about reason, logic etc, are sabotaged by your out of balance hormones mixed with your anger and frustrations.

                              That's just an emotional black mail tactic you use to cope with your own angst here, which you project on to me
                              Last edited by RevolutionThroughReason; 07-25-2012, 01:17 AM.
                              [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                              2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by faye View Post
                                is this pretentious rant an attempt to divert attention from your persitent yapping, muttzeal?

                                you stll crying because i criticised scientists? stop being an extremist scienofascist and get over it. scientists can do stupid and immoral things, too.


                                You're stuck in broken record mode I see, so you're a hypocrite and just don't want to fess up to it, that much is clear, and you're a poor opponent and hide behind emotional black mail as a scapegoat because you to ease the pain of humiliation. Your falsehood doesn't work on me
                                Last edited by RevolutionThroughReason; 07-25-2012, 01:16 AM.
                                [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                                2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X