Secularism kills 12 and injuries 71 in Colorado , EMKhan News Reports

[کیش]

Coincidence, that the UN was going to pass the unpopular "UN Small Arms Treaty 2012", next week. Now everyone and their grandma supports Gun Control.

What kind of pussy wussy kills 12 and injures 81 people then wilfully turn himself in to the police?

How does a Doctoral student sheep, afford to pay, perhaps, up to $20,000 for all that gear: Pistols, AR-15, Ammunition, gas mask, bullet proof vests, groin protection, explosives? Where do you get a bullet proof vest without working for/getting hooked up by the military, or a security contracting firm?

[faye]

'elementary, my dear watson.'

[RevolutionThroughReason]

Coincidence, that the UN was going to pass the unpopular "UN Small Arms Treaty 2012", next week. Now everyone and their grandma supports Gun Control.

What kind of pussy wussy kills 12 and injures 81 people then wilfully turn himself in to the police?

How does a Doctoral student sheep, afford to pay, perhaps, up to $20,000 for all that gear: Pistols, AR-15, Ammunition, gas mask, bullet proof vests, groin protection, explosives? Where do you get a bullet proof vest without working for/getting hooked up by the military, or a security contracting firm?

[RevolutionThroughReason]

still yapping
dreadful cross breed, you yappers.

is this somehow supposed to divert attention away from how much of a massive hypocrite you are by degrading the merits of science and yet shamelessly using its privileges afforded to you regardless? Shows much much conviction you lack.

[کیش]

says the man who says he "reasons," yet has never done so in his life.

That pictures doesn't even attempt to debunk my statements, you lose. So Solly

[RevolutionThroughReason]

says the man who says he "reasons," yet has never done so in his life.

That pictures doesn't even attempt to debunk my statements, you lose. So Solly

The lack of evidence in support of them debunks the statement itself. You did all the work for me. You clearly have not the slightest clue of how reason works.

Your challenge is like someone who claims Santa Clause exists, gets laughed at and then claims that others lose because his absurd claim isn't responded to. Learn what reason is first.

[randolph85]

this would of never happened at a viewing of the notebook.

[faye]

The lack of evidence in support of them debunks the statement itself. You did all the work for me. You clearly have not the slightest clue of how reason works.

Your challenge is like someone who claims Santa Clause exists, gets laughed at and then claims that others lose because his absurd claim isn't responded to. Learn what reason is first.

is 'reason' where you use dirty talk and sexual innuendos to intimidate people who are more intelligent than you?
is 'reason' where you flip out and accuse other men of being gay becuse you can't intimidate them in a debate?
is that how mutazillah wrecked the islamic golden age?

[faye]

did IT? I think I made a successful mockery of your constant obsession and secret romantic fixation with secularism quite nicely.

and now your grannyitis/nappy fixation is in the open and we all know what makes you happy.

[کیش]

The lack of evidence in support of them debunks the statement itself. You did all the work for me. You clearly have not the slightest clue of how reason works.

Your challenge is like someone who claims Santa Clause exists, gets laughed at and then claims that others lose because his absurd claim isn't responded to. Learn what reason is first.

Right, because Wal-Mart sells Bullet proof vests, and gas masks

Such reasoning by you.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

Right, because Wal-Mart sells Bullet proof vests, and gas masks

Such reasoning by you.

Yes because some guy on the internet figured out that the government would send some spastic idiotic to go shoot out a movie theater to tyrannize the populace who'll clumsily leave behind traces, when they have the capacity to use much more sinister means


such reasoning indeed

[کیش]

It is reasoning when I say how a dorky graduate student can buy bullet proof vests and gas masks.

Your not reasoning, just obeying what you hear from the mainstream media, which isn't reasoning at all.

Do you remember Operation Fast and Furious? DEA and ATF willingly sold automatic weapons to Mexican drug cartel members to "track" where they were going. One of those guns was used to kill DEA agents in Mexico. Not to mention the thousands of Mexicans were killed because of this program

[RevolutionThroughReason]

is 'reason' where you use dirty talk and sexual innuendos to intimidate people who are more intelligent than you?
is 'reason' where you flip out and accuse other men of being gay becuse you can't intimidate them in a debate?
is that how mutazillah wrecked the islamic golden age?

The use of controversial remarks doesn't change reason or rationality; The content of a debate or discourse of a topic is where rationality and logic are applied Anything outside of the context of the debate like insults is perfectly fine and don't compromise reason or rationality. All that intimidation mumbo jumbo is just an excuse you use to over compensate for your incompetence in being able to handle either scenario.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

It is reasoning when I say how a dorky graduate student can buy bullet proof vests and gas masks.

Your not reasoning, just obeying what you hear from the mainstream media, which isn't reasoning at all.

It's reasoning for people who can't think logically sure; but people who are better informed, it sounds like utter garbage and like a gullible moron who is easily swayed by half cocked theories that would appear on Alex Jones.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

Do you remember Operation Fast and Furious? DEA and ATF willingly sold automatic weapons to Mexican drug cartel members to "track" where they were going. One of those guns was used to kill DEA agents in Mexico. Not to mention the thousands of Mexicans were killed because of this program

So because something happened somewhere else it means the same thing happened here? That's what you're calling reasoning???