Taliban denied responsibility for the killing of an afghan woman

[Master Khan]

Muslims by Shari'ah don't accept Kufar Laws; thus this argument is void.

I know because Kufar law sucks, who wants their sisters or daughter walking outside half naked, only kufar people do.

[IamDZJ]

I feel so suffocated right now. Why did God make it possible for people to be this stupid!?

[Master Khan]

I feel so suffocated right now. Why did God make it possible for people to be this stupid!?

and who are you referring to?

[RevolutionThroughReason]

I know because Kufar law sucks, who wants their sisters or daughter walking outside half naked, only kufar people do.

I'm talking about in respects to International Law. You may find this hard to believe but during Nabi(saw)'s time many of the slave women were topless. None of them were penalized.

[Afghanistan2010]

If a goverment like Usa cant prevent crimes to take place taliban have less than them ability to prevent a rape or murder this happens everywhere in this world,in our times even more often death has become something common (i mean the murder of someone).Noone is against the persecution of such inhuman acts.

[khushal]

I agree, we should not accept Kaffir laws.

I never have and never will.

your living in the west, so by default you have. nothing wrong with that though.

[khushal]

Wrong, if AMerica told us to start drinking alcohol we wouldn't have to obey.....you have no idea what you're talking about. Pleas3e actually LEARN Islamic Law before talking about it. Pshtunwali is NOT Shari'ah

what does that have to do with what we are talking about. It is you who have no idea what your talking about. Where does it say in Islamic law that we cant live in america as law abiding citizens.

[IamDZJ]

and who are you referring to?

I was talking about you.
If you are such a good Muslim then why were you asking shamla if the girls that she lived were "hot" or not?? Is that what Islam has taught you?? Laws other than sharia does not require for people's daughters or sisters to walk around naked. That is something that people choose for themselves on their own. When you have the decency of making the right choice, you make the right choice. When you don't, you don't rearess of what the law says.
You people are used to being treate like cattle. Let the rest of us be.

[khushal]

First you don't believe that there is a reason for them to fix a problem which does not exist. Then you want to know why they are not fixing the problem.
This woman being shot to death is the misinterpretation of islam and its teachings for which the Taliban are responsible. You can't seriously be expecting NATO to teach afghans how to be better Muslims. Taliban can't just sit on their behinds and say they didn't do it. They should have some sense of responsibility too. They have no problem with slaughtering people otherwise, why not use those tactics to prevent crimes that we all consider inhuman.

I never said that problems dont exist. your making up your own version of the argument so you could easily defend it. This is called strawman fallacy.

Anything that happens in afghanistan, the occupiers are responsible according to international law. Taliban can do whatever they want in afghanistan good or bad, it is the job of the occupiers to stop them. If they can not, then get out and let the afghan society fix itself through natural social evolution. Nature is much more powerful than NATO is.

Not only is NATO not doing anything to stop this crap, but they are an obsticle for the society to do something about it themselves. NATO is no idiot, they know exactly what they are doing, It is in NATOs interst for the afghan society to live in turmoil that s is why they have done nothing in the past 11 years.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

what does that have to do with what we are talking about. It is you who have no idea what your talking about. Where does it say in Islamic law that we cant live in america as law abiding citizens.

Everything.......If a Law contradicts the Shari'ah we're not supposed to obey it. Our obedience is not actually obedience to their laws, it's Obedience to Laws that are concurrent with the Islamic Laws already. Laws like Interntional Law which are contradictory to Shari'ah Qanun, are not obeyed. the contexts are totally different.

you're really clueless.

[khushal]

If a goverment like Usa cant prevent crimes to take place taliban have less than them ability to prevent a rape or murder this happens everywhere in this world,in our times even more often death has become something common (i mean the murder of someone).Noone is against the persecution of such inhuman acts.

These western afghans are a bunch of idiot. They need to study law in their own lands before telling afghans how to live. It is their own laws that say the occupiers are responsible for the security of the ones being occupied. Why are they blaming the Taliban. This is how incompetent they are.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

These western afghans are a bunch of idiot. They need to study law in their own lands before telling afghans how to live. It is their own laws that say the occupiers are responsible for the security of the ones being occupied. Why are they blaming the Taliban. This is how incompetent they are.

It doesn't matter what Western Laws say, they don't apply in Shari'ah, in Muslims land, the Muslims living in the West argument is red herring.

[khushal]

Everything.......If a Law contradicts the Shari'ah we're not supposed to obey it. Our obedience is not actually obedience to their laws, it's Obedience to Laws that are concurrent with the Islamic Laws already. Laws like Interntional Law which are contradictory to Shari'ah Qanun, are not obeyed. the contexts are totally different.

you're really clueless.

strawman does not work with me.
The law we are talking about does not contradict Islam, I have stated this numerous times and we have already had a debate about this before where you lost as usual. Your getting desperate to try to mute the international law remark that I have been using. You cant because international scholars are all in agreement about this.

[Afghanistan2010]

Ywa insan ze ghayrat,watan,deen namos na peshany khagah ham da rakam we leka yow za gudakyan alta pe dey forum ke

[RevolutionThroughReason]

strawman does not work with me.
The law we are talking about does not contradict Islam, I have stated this numerous times and we have already had a debate about this before where you lost as usual. Your getting desperate to try to mute the international law remark that I have been using. You cant because international scholars are all in agreement about this.

what straw man argiument? You're claiming because Muslims are forbidden from stealing, murder and public unrest, means obeying Western Laws;

if anyone is making a straw man here, it's you; being a law abidng citizen in America has nothing to do with International Laws applying in a Muslim country.your argument has NO basis in Shari'ah; this is a reality, no matter how many times you repeat the same fallacy.