Pakistan Turns Against the West
Islamabad is now openly opposing the U.S. Former leaders knew better.
Sadanand Dhume | The Wall Street Journal Asia
May 30, 2012
If there were an award for committing international public relations suicide, Pakistan would be a perennial frontrunner. Last week's effort: the sentencing of Shakil Afridi, a doctor who helped the CIA track Osama bin Laden last year, to 33 years in prison for treason. In response, the U.S. Congress docked a symbolic $33 million from Pakistan's annual aid budget, or $1 million for every year of the doctor's sentence.
Washington's anger is understandable. In the year since bin Laden was discovered in a fortified mansion in the garrison town of Abbottabad, Pakistan has done little to dispel the widespread belief that the world's most wanted terrorist was sheltered by elements in the country's army and its spy agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence. Nobody has been punished for aiding bin Laden, part of a pattern of omissions whose beneficiaries certainly include the rogue nuclear scientist A. Q. Khan and Lashkar-e-Taiba's Hafiz Muhammad Saeed.
But as U.S.-Pakistan relations continue to nosedive, the risks for Islamabad run deeper than a mere PR disaster. For the first time since the country came into being in 1947, Pakistan is in danger of being seen as implacably hostile to the West. Should the U.S. switch from a policy of engagement to active containment, Pakistan's economic and diplomatic problems, already acute by any measure, may become unmanageable.

Comment