Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Serial rapist's Afghan ethnicity no excuse

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Serial rapist's Afghan ethnicity no excuse

    A JUDGE has today rejected an Afghan refugee's claim that he raped an intoxicated and vulnerable teenager because of cultural differences.

    Esmatullah Sharifi, 30, was appearing in the County Court for the second time in less than three years on a charge of rape and Judge Mark Dean said his background as a traumatised Muslim refugee was no excuse.

    The judge said a psychologist told the court Sharifi, who came to Australia in 2001 on a temporary protection visa, had "an unclear concept of what constitutes consent in sexual relationships'' in Australia.

    But the judge said Sharifi's background and flight from the Taliban in Afghanistan could not excuse an extreme act of violence.

    "You well knew the victim was not consenting to the act of sexual penetration you performed,'' Judge Dean said.

    Sentencing Sharifi for the rape of the 18-year-old woman, Judge Dean said that he had driven from his home in Tullamarine to Frankston looking for a victim.

    The woman was alone, intoxicated and sitting on the footpath near the 21st Century nightclub after she had a disagreement with her friends.

    Sharifi sat down beside her, started talking to her and offered to drive her to a hotel in Mornington where her friends had gone.

    Judge Dean said Sharifi drove in a different direction and the victim became concerned and texted her friends but he took her phone and found a dark street where he stopped.

    As she cried and asked if he planned to kill her Sharifi put his hand around her neck and forced her to remove her clothes before raping her.

    "Your offending is of the utmost seriousness,'' Judge Dean said in his County Court sentence.

    "You preyed upon a young vulnerable stranger who was alone and intoxicated at night. Your brutal conduct must be denounced by this court.''

    Sharifi pleaded guilty to one count of rape committed on December 19, 2008.

    Judge Dean said that in 2009 Sharifi was jailed for a minimum of seven years for the abduction and rape of a woman at Frankston on Christmas Eve, 2008, five days after the rape of the teenager.

    In that case he forced the 25-year-old into his car, punched her and raped her and the victim escaped by jumping from his moving car.

    A DNA sample taken after his conviction led to the charge he faced in court today.

    Judge Dean said that he had to sentence Sharifi by taking into account the sentence he is already serving and he set a new term of 14 years with a minimum term of 11 years.

    The effect of the sentence is that he will be eligible for parole in seven years and eight months.

    Read more: http://www.news.com.au/national/seri...#ixzz1rnsVYXTX

  • #2
    I don't know what's sicker; the fact the Defense was trying to use the "he ran away from the Taliban" scapegoat and that in his culture their concept of consent is different as a defense angle or the actual rape itself .

    I mean clearly in Afghanistan consent means going to a nightclub swooping down on a drunk 18 year old who is alone, taking advantage of the situation by deliberately misleading her, stealing her phone when she realizes it was a scheme and is trying to get help.

    It's too bad they don't have the death penalty for rape in Australia; this guy needs to fry.
    [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

    2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

    Comment


    • #3
      What a shame.
      Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.

      A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai

      For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."


      The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!

      -Ferishta, 1560–1620

      Comment


      • #4
        By a guy who looked actually rather more Chinese! Ok what ever.. !

        Comment

        Working...
        X