Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Afghan soldier kills 2 British troops

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Afghan soldier kills 2 British troops

    http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...c08c3ea30dbcf6
    Afghan soldier kills 2 British troops
    By HEIDI VOGT, Associated Press–54 minutes ago
    KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) — An Afghan soldier shot and killed two British troops Monday at a NATO coalition base in southern Afghanistan before being gunned down by international forces, officials said.
    The attack was the latest in a string of so-called "green on blue" attacks in which Afghan security forces have turned their guns on their international colleagues or mentors. Such attacks have become increasingly common over the past year, particularly since the burning of Qurans at a U.S. base in February.
    Fifteen NATO service members, including eight Americans, have been killed by Afghan security officials or militants disguised in their uniforms so far this year.
    Monday's shooting occurred around 11 a.m. in front of the main gate of a joint civilian-military base in Lashkar Gah, the provincial capital of Helmand province, the governor's office said.
    Ghulam Farooq Parwani, deputy commander of the Afghan National Army in Helmand, said the shooter was from the eastern Nangarhar province and had been in the army for four years. The Afghan soldier arrived at the gate of the base in an army vehicle. He was able to get close to the British troops by claiming that he had been assigned to provide security for a delegation of government officials from Kabul who were visiting the base Monday, according to Parwani.
    "He got close to the foreign troops — three or four meters (yards) — and he opened fire," Parwani said. "Then the foreign troops killed him."
    Taliban spokesman Qari Yousef Ahmadi said the shooter was an Afghan soldier who was in close contact with insurgents and had notified the Taliban of his planned attack before carrying it out.
    Since 2007, Afghan security forces have killed an estimated 79 NATO service members and wounded more than 110 others, according to the Pentagon. More than 75 percent of the attacks have occurred in the past two years.
    A Western official in southern Afghanistan confirmed that the attack happened at the main NATO base in Lashkar Gah, Helmand province but declined to give further information. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the information had not been officially released.
    Monday's attack also comes two weeks after a U.S. soldier allegedly went on a pre-dawn shooting rampage in neighboring Kandahar province, killing 17 people and wounding six.
    British Defense Secretary Philip Hammond confirmed the two killed were British service members.
    "Details of the incident are still emerging but it appears that a member of the Afghan National Army opened fire at the entrance gate to the British headquarters in Lashkar Gah," Hammond told the Commons. "Our thoughts, as ever, are with their families, for whom this will be a deeply personal tragedy."
    The killings come at a time when international troops have stepped up training and mentoring of Afghan soldiers, police and government workers so that Afghans can take the lead and the foreign forces can go home.
    The success of the partnership, which is the focus of the U.S.-led coalition's exit strategy, is threatened by the rising number of Afghan police and soldiers — or militants disguised in their uniforms — who are turning their guns on their foreign allies.
    Six American troops were killed in what were believed to be revenge attacks for the burning of the Qurans, although it is impossible to know the exact motive because most the shooters were killed in the incidents.
    On March 1, two U.S. troops were killed by two Afghan soldiers and an accomplice on a joint U.S.-Afghan base in Zhari district of Kandahar province in the south.
    On Feb. 25, two U.S. military advisers were found dead with shots to the back of the head inside the Afghan Interior Ministry in Kabul.
    Two U.S. troops were killed Feb. 23 by an Afghan soldier during an anti-Western protest in Nangarhar province in eastern Afghanistan over the Quran burning.
    The U.S. apologized for the burning, saying the Islamic texts were mistakenly sent to a garbage burn pit Feb. 20 at Bagram Air Field, north of Kabul. But the incident raised what had been simmering animosity toward outsiders to a full boil. Deadly protests raged around the nation for six days — the most visible example of a deep-seated resentment bred by what Afghans view is a general lack of respect for their culture and religion.

  • #2
    obviously, he snapped. Should've been given a day in court to explain his side of the story.

    Comment


    • #3
      I just read on a French newspaper that a third one was killed today in the east by an 'afghan policeman'.

      someone finds the english version of it

      Comment


      • #4
        the whole country should fight these pigs.
        get rid of these virus.

        Comment


        • #5

          Afghan security forces kill 3 NATO troops



          Marine Gen. John Allen, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan gestures during a news conference at the Pentagon, Monday, March 26, 2012. (AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari) (Haraz N. Ghanbari)


          KABUL, Afghanistan — Afghan security forces shot and killed three international troops Monday, one of them an American, in two attacks. They were the latest in a rising number of attacks in which Afghan forces have turned their weapons on their foreign partners.

          The killings reflect a spike in tensions between Afghan and international forces that follow an American soldier's alleged massacre of Afghan civilians, the burning of Muslim holy books at a U.S. base, and uncertainty about Afghanistan's fate as foreign troops prepare to pull out.

          They also come at a time when international troops have stepped up training and mentoring of Afghan soldiers, police and government workers so that Afghans can take the lead and the foreign forces can go home. The success of that partnership is key to the U.S.-led coalition's strategy to withdraw most foreign combat forces by the end of 2014.

          U.S. Marine Gen. John Allen, the top commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, told reporters at the Pentagon that these types of attacks are characteristic of any warfare involving insurgents.

          "We experienced these in Iraq. We experienced them in Vietnam," Allen said. "On any occasion where you're dealing with an insurgency and where you're also growing an indigenous force ... the enemy's going to do all that they can to disrupt both the counterinsurgency operations" and the developing nation's security forces.

          Since 2007, an estimated 80 NATO service members were killed by Afghan security forces, according to an Associated Press tally, which is based on Pentagon figures released in February. More than 75 percent of the attacks have occurred in the past two years.

          Sixteen NATO service members — 18 percent of the 84 foreign troops killed so far this year — have been shot and killed by Afghan soldiers and policemen or militants disguised in their uniforms, according to the AP tally.

          In one incident Monday, two British service members were killed by an Afghan soldier in front of the main gate of a joint civilian-military base in southern Afghanistan, the coalition said. Another NATO service member was shot and killed at a checkpoint in eastern Afghanistan by a man who was believed to be a member of a village-level fighting force the U.S. is fostering in hopes of countering the Taliban insurgency. The Pentagon confirmed Monday that the dead soldier was American but did not release further details.

          Maj. Ian Lawrence, a British military spokesman for Task Force Helmand, said one of the British troops was a Royal Marine and the other was a soldier from the British Adjutant General's Corps. They were killed in front of the base in Lashkar Gah, the provincial capital of Helmand province.

          The soldier, who had been in the Afghan National Army for four years, arrived at the gate in an army vehicle, said Ghulam Farooq Parwani, deputy commander of the Afghan army in Helmand. He was able to get close to the British troops by claiming that he had been assigned to provide security for a delegation of government officials from Kabul who were visiting the base Monday, Parwani added.

          "He got close to the foreign troops — three or four meters (yards) — and he opened fire," Parwani said. "Then the foreign troops killed him."

          It is not the first time that Afghan security forces have killed their British counterparts. On Nov. 3, 2009, a rogue Afghan policeman killed five British soldiers who had been advising Afghan police at a checkpoint in Helmand province.

          Taliban spokesman Qari Yousef Ahmadi said the shooter was an Afghan soldier who was in close contact with insurgents and had notified the Taliban of his planned attack before carrying it out.

          However, Wahid Muzhda, a former Taliban foreign ministry official and an analyst on issues related to the group, said the Taliban were not behind most of the latest killings.

          "All these killings are not linked to the Taliban," Muzhda said. "The recent Quran burnings and the shooting spree — the killing of children— are affecting the minds of the Afghan soldiers. They think the foreigners are looking out for their own interests. They think if the foreigners are coming here to defend Afghanistan, why are they killing children?"

          The trust between the Afghan forces and their international mentors is being undermined, he said.

          "How is the mentor supposed to teach if he is afraid of the Afghan soldiers? They have weapons. How can he relax?"

          While they acknowledge that these type of attacks are on the rise, coalition officials say they must be viewed in context. They say there are about 100,000 coalition troops working side-by-side with more than 300,000 Afghan troops.

          "In most cases, the relationship is very strong. They know each other well," Allen said. "We have taken steps necessary on our side to protect ourselves with respect to, in fact, sleeping arrangements, internal defenses associated with those small bases in which we operate, the posture of our forces, to have someone always overwatching our forces.

          "On the Afghan side, they are doing the same thing. I mean, they're helping the troops to understand how to recognize radicalization or the emergence of extremism in ... individuals who may in fact be suspect."

          Monday's attack came two weeks after a U.S. soldier allegedly went on a pre-dawn shooting rampage in neighboring Kandahar province, killing 17 Afghan civilians — four men, four women and nine children.

          That incident followed the burning of Qurans at a U.S. base north of Kabul last month. The U.S. apologized for the burning, saying the Islamic texts were mistakenly sent to a garbage burn pit Feb. 20 at Bagram Air Field. But the incident raised to a full boil what had been simmering animosity toward outsiders.

          Deadly protests raged around the nation for six days — the most visible example of a deep-seated resentment bred by what Afghans view is a general lack of respect for their culture and religion.

          During the protests, Afghan soldiers killed six American troops. Two were killed in Kandahar province, two in Nangarhar province in the east and the other two were found dead with shots to the back of the head inside the Interior Ministry in Kabul.

          Comment


          • #6
            I think fzpz is being sarcastic

            Comment


            • #7
              smashing
              There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

              Sayyid Qutb

              Comment


              • #8
                I want a moment of silence and our prayers and thoughts are with the family and relatives and with the hero who made this possible,and showed how one should stand up and resist to exist and die for his rights.

                May Allah give him jannah and reward and forgive him for his wrong doings.

                silence.
                High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.

                Comment


                • #9

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

                    Sayyid Qutb

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      yeah Payback, three guys? It will probably take 60 Taliban to get 20 marines. That's pathetic. another reason why Taliban are a disgrace, they fight like women!
                      [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                      2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
                        yeah Payback, three guys? It will probably take 60 Taliban to get 20 marines. That's pathetic. another reason why Taliban are a disgrace, they fight like women!
                        There are more than 50 000 taliban fighters,and if everyone kills three invaders ? 150 000 invaders dead `? or ?.
                        High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          just 1 year left and now suddenly they are waking up....

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            the kill ratio is terrible, they kill significantly more Taliban for every soldier they lose to the Taliban

                            so for the 50,000 Taliban to kill three each means there will be Negative values of Taliban left in the process. Let's assume Every U.S. soldier the Taliban kill there are 3 Taliban killed, that means for 50,000 soldiers to kill 3 U.S. soldiers each means to kill 150,000 U.S. soldiers would mean there would be a -1,300,000 Taliban would have to die. That is a nonsensical number, and this is just based on the assumption a very generous assumption. The actual kill ratios of Taliban per American soldiers is much much higher.
                            [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                            2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Should we count the casualties of the taliban reported by the US and NATO troops ?

                              from wikipedia :

                              The total number of Taliban killed in the period covered is between 36,994 and 41,170, according to the figures below.

                              That means that the Islamic Emirate has some 100 000 + soldiers,because we have now almost 50 000 to 80 000 fighters (including reinforcement). Alhamdulillah.


                              lol if so many taliban were killed we would for sure have seen some mountains out of their bones.
                              High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X