Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

US to leave a private army in Iraq

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • US to leave a private army in Iraq

    Yesterday, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki set off for the United States, where he will meet with top American officials to discuss the future of the two countries' strategic partnership following US withdrawal from Iraq, which is to be completed this month. Meanwhile, the State Department is deploying thousands of diplomats and private security guards to help Iraqi authorities maintain order. The Iraqi delegation's composition show just how serious the talks will be. On his trip, al-Maliki is accompanied by key members of the Iraqi government: Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, acting Defense Minister Saadoun al-Duleymi, Transport Minister Khairullah Hassan Babakir, Trade Minister Hadi al-Ameri, and National Security Adviser Falah al-Fayadh.

    The Prime Minister will meet with President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and US congressmen. The official agenda of the visit covers a wide range of topics – from security and energy, to education and the justice system. However, the main subject of discussions will be the new phase in the strategic partnership between the US and Iraq, which will now act as a fully sovereign state.

    The US is expected to complete its full withdrawal from Iraq by the end of this month. Any remaining troops will either be packing their things, or patrolling Iraqi roads for roadside bombs and traps, so as to ensure a safe passage for convoys headed for the Kuwaiti border.

    Currently, 6,000 US soldiers and officers are stationed at four bases in Iraq; following the withdrawal, there will be only 157 soldiers and 763 civilian Pentagon employees, who will focus primarily on training Iraqi forces. In particular, the instructors will assist Iraqis in the usage and maintenance of F-16 fighter jets and other US-made military equipment.

    The total number of Iraqi troops and police has reached 900,000 people, a team large enough to independently maintain stability within the country. However, Iraqi forces are not yet ready to repel foreign aggression while controlling their airspace and territorial waters.

    American officials initially planned to leave a limited contingent of troops in Iraq after the New Year, but these plans hit an unexpected obstacle after Baghdad refused to grant US soldiers immunity from prosecution. This means that, in the event of civilian death or injury, American soldiers will be tried in Iraqi courts, accepting any potential consequences. The Pentagon was not satisfied with this scenario.

    Therefore, a contingent of 16,000 US diplomats and private security personnel will remain in Iraq, effectively ensuring an American military presence in the country. These “diplomatic” expeditionary forces – who are granted immunity from prosecution – will be stationed at four major (Baghdad, Basra, Irbil, and Kirkuk) and seven secondary sites resembling fortresses or military bases. At certain sites, the number of security guards will be twice that of the diplomats. Moreover, special companies are being hired to provide aviation support and to escort diplomatic convoys.

    According to the Wall Street Journal, the projected cost of supporting such an extended diplomatic mission is nearly $3.8 billion. In any case, this constitutes major savings when compared to the $40 billion spent this year alone on military operations in Iraq.

    US to leave a private army in Iraq — RT
    Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.

    A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai

    For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."


    The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!

    -Ferishta, 1560–1620

  • #2
    It means US was not there in Iraq to occupy but to oust the dictator and now having democracy there its leaving Iraq.

    One day the same will happen in Afghanistan. Afghanistan will be modern democratic country and US will leave the country and Afghans will be the rulers.US is not here to occupy but to to defeat the Sadam of Afghanistan, the Taliban and Al-Qa'ida.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by osho View Post
      It means US was not there in Iraq to occupy but to oust the dictator and now having democracy there its leaving Iraq.

      One day the same will happen in Afghanistan. Afghanistan will be modern democratic country and US will leave the country and Afghans will be the rulers.US is not here to occupy but to to defeat the Sadam of Afghanistan, the Taliban and Al-Qa'ida.
      Keep living in your delusional little kafir world.

      I hope this private army will be burnt alive like the thousand of other contractors and occupiers who killed civilians for fun and occupied my country based on false information.

      Comment


      • #4
        osho. you still haven't done your homework. read 'the great iraqi heist'.
        that paul bremer, that ripped all those billions of iraqs money and was given control of iraq, by the bush administration, apparently got the iraqis to sign a deal, that the americans would be immune from prosecution for their crimes against humanity, in iraq. i am glad they have finally overturned this 'undemocratic' rule.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by al-arab View Post
          Keep living in your delusional little kafir world.

          I hope this private army will be burnt alive like the thousand of other contractors and occupiers who killed civilians for fun and occupied my country based on false information.
          i cant describe to you how much i love and respect the lions of fallujah

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by osho View Post
            It means US was not there in Iraq to occupy but to oust the dictator and now having democracy there its leaving Iraq.

            One day the same will happen in Afghanistan. Afghanistan will be modern democratic country and US will leave the country and Afghans will be the rulers.US is not here to occupy but to to defeat the Sadam of Afghanistan, the Taliban and Al-Qa'ida.
            I can no longer ever take you seriously after I found out why you call yourself Osho.

            I thought before, it was a mark of intelligence... as in you were using the Pashto word "ausho" as in, "its done."

            Then I found our that you were an adherent to some freak who put salmonella in everyone's drinking water who wore a Star Trek uniform named Osho.

            Thats when I lost all faith in you. You went from being sane, calibrated, and a well honed adversay in debate to loony.
            "2 crackheads don't become any better or stronger by sharing the same crack pipe." - Greatest PF quote

            Comment

            Working...
            X