Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Two British terror suspects killed in US drone strikes in Pakistan

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Two British terror suspects killed in US drone strikes in Pakistan

    Two British terror suspects killed in US drone strikes in Pakistan

    Pair, both Muslims from east London, believed to have been killed in separate incidents in the South Waziristan region

    Ibrahim Adam, who is believed to have been killed in a US drone attack in Pakistan. Photograph: Metropolitan Police/PA


    Two young British men have been killed in US drone strikes against suspected militants in Pakistan's tribal belt, according to reports from the country. The pair, both Muslims from London, are reported to have been killed in separate drone strikes two weeks apart in South Waziristan.

    One of the men has been named as Ibrahim Adam, 24, who fled from the UK with his brother four years ago, while both were the subject of control orders. The second is said to be Mohammed Azmer Khan, 38, the brother of another British Muslim, Abdul Jabbar, who was killed in a drone attack last year.

    The Foreign Office was unable to confirm the deaths on Friday but said: "We are aware of reports and looking into them further."

    Adam's father said: "We can confirm that we have heard that our son has been killed in a drone strike."

    He said the family regarded him as having been "executed" without having committed any crime. "We now wish to be left alone and grieve for our son."

    Reports from the region suggest the number of suspected militants being killed by missiles fired by unmanned US aircraft may be escalating sharply.
    One strike on Wednesday, in which missiles are said to have been launched against a suspected militant base near the Afghan border, is reported to have killed up to 18 men. Another on Thursday is said to have killed between four and seven men.

    The two Britons were from Ilford in east London. Although news of their deaths has just emerged, both are said to have been killed weeks ago. Adam is said to have been killed six weeks ago while riding a motorcycle, and the second man is said to have been killed two weeks later.
    Adam and his older brother, Lamine, were described as dangerous by then home secretary John Reid when they absconded in May 2007, along with a third man who later surrendered and whose control order was subsequently quashed.

    The pair are thought to have fled the UK on a flight to Pakistan by using passports belonging to associates from the south of England. Adam is understood to have left behind a wife and two children in east London. Shortly before they fled, a third brother, who changed his name to Anthony Garcia while pursuing a career as a male model, was jailed for life after being found guilty at the Old Bailey of conspiring to cause explosions.
    Although the Adam brothers were assessed as not posing a direct threat to the UK when they went on the run, MI5 is thought to have since suspected that Ibrahim Adam may have been involved in a Mumbai-style plot to mount a gun attack on targets in the UK.

    The second British man whose death is being reported was in his 30s and was also the subject of a control order before travelling to Pakistan.
    Previously, MPs have expressed concern at a drone attack that claimed a British life. In November 2008 when Rashid Rauf, a terrorism suspect from Birmingham, was reported to have been killed in South Waziristan, MPs demanded to know what the British government had known in advance of the strike.

    Patrick Mercer, Conservative MP for Newark, said the attack had "ultimately led to the execution of a British subject" and called for a statement from the government.

    US intelligence officials insist the number of civilians killed in drone attacks is low, while local and international media reports have put the number at several hundred.

    Earlier this year, human rights activists in Pakistan said they were planning to bring legal proceedings against CIA lawyers, who have given legal advice approving such strikes, and the UK government, which they accuse of providing targeting intelligence

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011...drone-pakistan

  • #2
    What amuses me is the fact that how did these two British citizens get into Waziristan so easily. It took me hours and lots of inspection of my passport/luggage.

    What also amuses me, is the fact, that why are they in Waziristan for? and how dare his family regard him as not having committed a crime.

    The first crime he done, was leave his wife and children and set off to kill the husbands of Pashtun wives and fathers of Pashtun children.

    Secondly, he has given fuel to British political parties who oppose immigrant community actions to accuse them of having terrorist elements present.

    thirdly, he has absolutely no remorse to the development of Pashtun land, and the future, while his family lives a cosy life on the benefit system of the secular Shaytaan state of Britain, he decided to live the rest of his life, carrying a AK47 and attacking the natives of those lands.

    Terrible!

    Comment


    • #3
      Some idiots claim that as long US is in the region, the region won´t experience peace. I say, as long terrorists are in the region, the region won´t experience peace. No terrorists, no US.

      Comment


      • #4
        Well that is one fact one must accept. Even when America was not never present in Afghanistan, but also when America cut off all funds to the Mujahideen when the Soviets withdrew, there was still war, fighting and a civil war going all aided and funded by the government of Pakistan and its intelligence agencies.

        Where was the protests from the West and Muslim world over the large number of innocent Afghans who were killed by constant rocket attacks by bickering Jihadi leaders, or when women were subjected to one of the worst living standards ever given to them during the rule of the Taliban?

        Nobody cared about our people, only until America came into Afghanistan and made its double crossing neighbours nervous, do we all see the whole "America is to blame, America causes this and West is causing that", ohhh "the Muslim blood is being split" etc!

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Soldat_Amir View Post
          Well that is one fact one must accept. Even when America was not never present in Afghanistan, but also when America cut off all funds to the Mujahideen when the Soviets withdrew, there was still war, fighting and a civil war going all aided and funded by the government of Pakistan and its intelligence agencies.

          Where was the protests from the West and Muslim world over the large number of innocent Afghans who were killed by constant rocket attacks by bickering Jihadi leaders, or when women were subjected to one of the worst living standards ever given to them during the rule of the Taliban?

          Nobody cared about our people, only until America came into Afghanistan and made its double crossing neighbours nervous, do we all see the whole "America is to blame, America causes this and West is causing that", ohhh "the Muslim blood is being split" etc!
          Wrong, the historical record offers you no support. Absolutely none. In fact, you confuse cause and effect. The Muj commanders and their wars were an event that occured in the first place after the war. The war occured because Russia was stupid enough to make the same mistake the Americans made in Vietnam, ie. to intervene and the Afghan government was stupid enough to think they could play off two powers against eachother.

          You also forget about Operation Ajax in Iran, the arming of saddam in response to the blowback (as documented by the CIA in regard to the first time blowback was used in the literature as a word), the subsequent aftermath in terms of the Saudi involvement, the dispersing of jihadi elements outside of the arab states due to the interventions that April Glaspie, in her now famous wikileaked memo, promised would not happen.

          You are naive to assume that a guerrilla insurgency will just cease the minute the occupier power leaves a place. Vietnem festered and the Vietcong was even a more powerfully united force then the disarrayed muj fighters, all at odds with eachother.

          So the muj effect was a direct result of idiotic interventions by world powers into Afghanistan. Moreover, the Western bast-ards had just yet been out of Afghanistan or nears its borders for a little less than half a century as per the British involvements there.

          And emprically your logic is false too the muj fighting sequences were an internal affair between Afghans and locally in the region. The world protests and did protest during the iraq and afghan interventions and even the recent Libya intervention because the US has no place involving itself in the internal affairs of people unless its ready to deal with the blowback it causes itself.
          "2 crackheads don't become any better or stronger by sharing the same crack pipe." - Greatest PF quote

          Comment

          Working...
          X