Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Afghans protest against long-term US pact

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Afghans protest against long-term US pact

    Afghans protest against long-term US pact
    More than 1,000 students demonstrate against decision to back agreement that would allow US troops to remain after 2014.

    Last Modified: 20 Nov 2011 17:41


    inShare7

    Email


    Print


    Share


    Feedback



    The protesters blocked the road to the capital Kabul as they shouted 'Death to America! Death to Karzai!' [AFP] Hundreds of Afghan students have blocked a main highway in the eastern city of Jalalabad, protesting against any agreement that would allow US troops to remain in the country after a planned transfer of authority in 2014.
    More than 1,000 students took part in Sunday's demonstration, which was staged after an assembly of more than 2,000 tribal elders and dignitaries - known as a loya jirga - endorsed the agreement.
    But the assembly backed a series of conditions proposed by Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, including the end of night raids by international troops.

    They also endorsed a complete Afghan control over detainees during a conference that ended on Saturday.
    The protesters in Jalalabad blocked the road to the capital Kabul as they shouted "Death to America! Death to Karzai!".
    They said they would not accept any partnership with the US, whose troops - along with those of NATO - have been battling the Taliban and al-Qaeda in Afghanistan since 2001.

    Taliban resistance
    Both the resolution and the protests reflect the tension in Afghanistan between a desire for real sovereignty and the need to bolster the relatively weak government against the still-strong Taliban resistance.

    Afghan council endorsed the plan for an agreement on a long-term American military presence [Al Jazeera] The idea of the proposed security agreement is to keep a US military presence in Afghanistan past 2014, when most international forces will have left.
    Afghan and US officials envision a force of several thousand US troops, who would train Afghan forces and help with counterterrorism operations.
    The pact would outline the legal status of that force in Afghanistan, as well as the rules under which it would operate and the sites where it would be based.
    The jirga's resolution carries no legal weight, but could bolster Karzai's negotiating position with the US during difficult talks under way to craft what Washington is calling a Strategic Partnership Document.
    For its part, the Taliban condemned the Loya Jirga (grand assembly), saying that the elders and dignitaries were puppets of the Afghan government and therefore also puppets of NATO and US forces it sees as occupiers.
    "They are acting like servants of the invaders of our country by issuing this resolution," Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid said in a statement. He repeated the Taliban position that the only acceptable solution is for international forces to leave the country.

  • #2
    Death to America ! Death to Karzai !

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by SmoothCriminal View Post
      Death to America ! Death to Karzai !
      this words in pink look ajib hehe

      Comment


      • #4
        such sad news... comon karzai wakeup may allah show you the truth and act upon it ameen

        Comment


        • #5
          I wonder how Karzai feels about all this deep down inside.
          Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.

          A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai

          For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."


          The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!

          -Ferishta, 1560–1620

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Admin Khan View Post
            I wonder how Karzai feels about all this deep down inside.
            Admin Khan, you ever wonder, why there is hardly any protests of this scale against suicide bombing, forced marriages of young girls and vast number of innocent women killed in the name of "honor killings"?

            Its because it does not favor the political powers.

            If Nato/America goes, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia will replace them, and I am sure 99 percent of Afghans will be pouring into other countries as refugees due to these two meddling states, and they would have wish they used that aid and development to the betterment of their own nation.

            Comment

            Working...
            X