Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Russian Warships to Syrian waters

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Russian Warships to Syrian waters

    Russian Warships to Syrian waters



    (DP-News - agencies) According to Russian sources, Russia is sending its warships to Syrian waters in a move aimed at preventing any foreign attacks against Syrian territories. The recent move conveys the message that Moscow will block any NATO-led attack under the guise of “humanitarian intervention,” The Nation reported.

    Russia has been voicing support for Syria, which it says is currently going through a civil war.

    The Western military alliance, NATO, has been making efforts to demonize the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his forces, while downplaying attacks by opposition forces.






    Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has also recently warned the West against any “Libya-style” military intervention in Syria.

    Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin on Friday said that Russia rejects using force to solve international problems, adding that Moscow's stance at the UN Security Council concerning Syria was characterized by restraint and foresight.

    In a press conference with his French counterpart in Moscow, Putin downplayed the importance of the British- French- German step manifested in setting draft resolution on Syria in the UN General Assembly.

    He expressed hope that the New York Police Department won't resort to asymmetric force to disperse the demonstrators of Occupy Wall Street Movement, adding that human rights should be respected in France, Russia, Syria and the USA.

    He criticized the attempts of some sides at changing the reality of matters in Syria, adding that Syria's issue is very sensitive to Russia because Syria is close to Russia's borders.

    Co-Chairman of the Russian Committee for Solidarity with the Syrian People Oleg Fomin said that the Arab League has behaved according to the US and Europe instructions and to satisfy the Nato-member, Turkey .

    "The Arab League resolution against Syria was unfair… it was adopted by the Arab countries in the Gulf area that don't want to see any state realize development and justice, but they want to return to the occupation ear following the World War I," Fomin said in a speech to SANA correspondent in Moscow.

    He was confident that the Russian stance towards Syria is firm, hoping this stance would remain clear in defending principles of justice and right.

    Fomin said that the Syrian external opposition delegation who visited Moscow failed to change the Russian leadership's stance over Syria.

    Syria has been experiencing unrest since mid-March, with demonstrations being held both against and in support of Syrian President Assad.

    According to the United Nations more than 3,000 people, including members of the security forces, have been killed in the turmoil.

    The opposition and Western countries accuse Syrian security forces of being behind the killings in the country, but the government blames what it describes as outlaws, saboteurs and armed terrorist groups for the deadly violence, stressing that the unrest is being orchestrated from abroad.

    Russian Warships to Syrian waters | English | NEWS | DayPress

  • #2
    A very complex situation developing here which draws many parallels to Afghanistan in the time right before the Soviet war which was supported by the Militant Secularists/Communists who assassinated Daud Khan, this war against Afghanistan led to Soviet defeat, resulting in an aftermath engulfed in Afghan infighting which was the cause of so many crimes and killings.

    The era of disorder, murder, and crimes which plagued Afghanistan then gave rise to the Taliban which was a direct response to this disorder and insecurity.

    Same could happen in Syria now, but the Syrian opposition unlike the Libyan opposition has rejected US help.

    Muslim Brotherhood reject NATO intervention in Syria - YouTube
    Last edited by Guest; 11-20-2011, 02:52 AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Assad was involved with the US and assisted them in the rendition program, permitting supposed "suspects" that the US could torture and interrogate in Syrian prisons or having Syrian officials doing the torturing for the US. Gaddafi was also involved in this too. One of the Libyan opposition leaders, Belhaj, was tortured at these US sites within Gaddafi run Libya. http://news.antiwar.com/2011/09/04/l...ition-torture/

      Libya's new Sharia government is acutely aware of this and Belhaj (now government) leader is one of the most influential voices in Libya, so it is doubtful that a pro- American Libyan (Ali Tarhouni) will have any sway over the new government there.
      Last edited by Guest; 11-20-2011, 05:08 AM.

      Comment


      • #4
        A "very complex" situation is correct. I'm hesitant to make any statements regarding this situation yet. The obvious is that the Syrian people should be VERY suspicious of Russian involvement in anything, even if it appears on the surface to be purely humanitarian or anything else positive. What something seems to be initially, is not necessarily what it actually is. Make sure the Russians REMAIN in the water if you know what I mean.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Zmarak View Post
          A "very complex" situation is correct. I'm hesitant to make any statements regarding this situation yet. The obvious is that the Syrian people should be VERY suspicious of Russian involvement in anything, even if it appears on the surface to be purely humanitarian or anything else positive. What something seems to be initially, is not necessarily what it actually is. Make sure the Russians REMAIN in the water if you know what I mean.
          I'm on the same boat as you. Let's wait and see how this unfolds. Passing judgements now are premature.
          Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.

          A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai

          For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."


          The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!

          -Ferishta, 1560–1620

          Comment

          Working...
          X