Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

US officials met Haqqani network with ISI help

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • US officials met Haqqani network with ISI help

    US officials met Haqqani network with ISI help

    No unilateral action inside Pakistan: Clinton

    ISLAMABAD: US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Friday ruled out any unilateral action against terrorists’ safe havens inside Pakistan saying, “We want action against them in concert with our strategic partners like Pakistan.” During her roundtable talks with anchorpersons of various TV channels, she responded to various questions on Pakistan-US relations, particularly their joint efforts to fight the war on terror. When asked if the United States was pondering to send its troops inside Pakistan, she categorically said this option was not being considered.

    “We don’t want to take action unilaterally, we want to act in concert with our strategic partners like Pakistan and other allies.” Replying to a question regarding her reported warning to Islamabad, Clinton said the warning was: “If we don’t handle safe havens together the consequences could be terrific to both the US and Pakistan.” In response to another query that ISI was involved in attack on the US embassy in Kabul through Haqqani network, she categorically said,” We have no evidence of that.”

    Clinton admitted that the United States had held one exploratory meeting with the Haqqani network before a series of massive attacks. “In fact, the Pakistani government officials helped to facilitate such a meeting,” she said. But “we’re not in any kind of negotiations. We’ve had one preliminary meeting just to see if they would show up.” agencies

    Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan

  • #2
    How can the Haqqanis state they are not connected with Pakistan when Pakistani officials are organizing meetings with them and the Americans.

    Comment


    • #3
      And i met Ghaddafi today , he was quite alive.He was staying in a tent near the Algerian border he was well.Then i took my 9mm and shot him in his dirty face.
      High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.

      Comment


      • #4
        Afghanistan2010,
        Who paid for your 9mm gun - was it NATO issued?

        So like Mr Al-Arab, you like to play the game of "good NATO, bad NATO" - sometimes you say that what NATO is doing is good, and then sometimes you say what NATO is doing is bad. So you aren't really anti-NATO at all, because you support them in Libya.

        So why don't you change your name to Libya2010, since your heart is over there?

        Khushal claimed that Brzezinski was opposed to all communists, but in reality Brzezinski similarly played the game of "good communist, bad communist" since Brzezinski was only opposing Soviet communists while at the same time he was also supporting communists like China and Cambodia's Khmer Rouge.

        Mr Libya2010, why don't you understand that such hypocrisies are just political games?
        Qaddafi gave many juicy oil contracts to Italy, but now those oil contracts will go to victors France and Britain.
        Similarly, Saddam had given many juicy oil contracts to France, but after America invaded, then those contracts went to US companies.
        Maybe Libya is being given to Britain and France as compensation for losses in Iraq.

        Obama seems to be very inexperienced. During the 1950s, Britain and France made a deal with Israel to quickly seize the Suez Canal from Egypt, by air-dropping troops there. But US President Eisenhower immediately put his foot down, and strongly warned Britain, France, Israel to stop their games right away. These smaller powers were then forced to back down. Eisenhower was experienced, because he was a top WW2 general. But Obama is inexperienced and has allowed Britain and France to lead him towards whatever they wanted. A more experienced president would have known better.

        Likewise Mr Libya2010 (so-called Afghanistan2010), you are inexperienced and you will allow people like Mr Al-Arab to lead you towards whatever he wants. Because you surrender your judgement to others and blindly let them lead you, then you only increase the suffering of your own family and community. Is this what you want?

        Comment


        • #5
          I claim and regard NATO as terrorist organisation ( i want to print a shirt with i hope soon when i have time i will post you the picture me in public with a shirt : NATO = North Atlantic TERRORIST Organisation)

          And i have never supported NATO nor its operations while they always have an aim to achieve it like Oil of the Libyan people.

          But if i dislike one( Ghaddafi and its regime) does not mean i support the other.

          For me they are both enemies of Allah and i even disliked the killing of this person(Ghaddafi) because execution without judgment from Shariah or selfjustice is against Islam and the laws of Allah.


          There are more than 36 different groups operating alone in Tripoli which have different aims ( they say the enemie of my enemie is my friend until i win).

          And there are groups who are fighting for Allah those who were fighting ones in Afghanistan who operate in Misrata or Berga and they use the Black banner with La ilha ilAllah muhammad rasulAllah ...you may have seen some.
          High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.

          Comment


          • #6
            No, you listen only to your buddy Mr Al-Arab, and then you believe only what he tells you to believe. He doesn't like Qaddafi, so you then you don't like Qaddafi. You just stupidly agree with whatever he wants. Arab Osama wanted to invite a war with the USA by bombing them, and so Taliban stupidly agreed to whatever he wanted. Same process - they say, and you blindly follow. You have no mind to think for yourself.

            Likewise, US has some similar stupidity. People like Brzezinski come up with crazy schemes to start wars, and then American leaders stupidly agree.



            Last edited by Guest; 10-22-2011, 06:27 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Sanman, this is the thing, they follow the wrong people, Afghanistan2010, lives in the west, he hasnt felt the long wack from a stick to stand in line, and neither has he been told to hand over his female members to marry militants as we saw in Swat whereby Fazullah forced parents to give their daughters to Arabs/Uzbeks.

              I have seen this with my own eyes. Our land is infected and infested with vermin from other Muslim countries, and their governments couldnt care less if a Pashtun boy is blown into pieces by a lunatic Uzbek from Uzbekistan or give two dammes if a Pashtun blow is blown up by a Arab whose decided to spiritually cleanse himself by strapping a suicide vest and taking a truck load of innocent Pashtun bystanders with him.

              Afghanistan2010, correct your reality from falsehood, Taliban is just a Proxy tool of Pakistani foreign policy, everyone who has lived in Pakhtunkhwa will tell you the same, Taliban aow Pakistan bhai bhai, the only ones who object to this, are those from Pakistan Army families, go ask the IDP's and they will explain to you how helpless they are infront of a truckloads of bearded long haired fanatics from the middle east, chechnya and central asia/West.

              To be honest, our people are too soft otherwise I am sure Khushal Khattak was alive to this day, he would have rounded every single foreigner and slaughtered them for daring to manipulate the Pashtun people, we need a strong xenophobic Pashtun leader, who isn't soft on issues such as Religinoust emotional blackmail/confronting the clerics!

              Comment


              • #8
                You guys are again making conspiracy theories,oh mon dieu.

                Ghaddafi was my enemy or a terrorist because he slaughtered hundreds, thousands of people and sold them to the American and European terrorists for some Dollars.
                He was enemy of Allah and his Messenger,for they are our enemies.

                Im a Muslim everyone who acts in anyway against a muslim we will fight him and act against them.

                So if Ghaddafi tortured muslims who are my brethern i will wait til we retaliate.

                We as muslims we are a tribe,nation,a single body we are an Ummah.

                there is the lack of your understanding.

                Fazlulllah and his men were great warriors who fought a dog state an apostate state and its armies,and slaughtered pakistani soldiers in masses.

                I remember that pakistani soldiers did not act against soldiers of the islamic emirate of afghanistan because they fear the soldiers of the Islamic Emirate will capture this dirty state(Pakistan).

                And i want to remember you that Mullah Sangeen (hz) leader of the eastern sector of Paktika and Paktia province of the islamic emirate and his men were responsible for numerous attacks in Pakistan (like 18-hour raid on the Navy base) because he is allied to Hakim and Baitullah mehsud.
                Last edited by Afghanistan2010; 10-23-2011, 10:07 AM.
                High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.

                Comment


                • #9
                  What are you talking about? You think that Pakistani soldiers respect Afghans?

                  The Pakistanis rule over the Afghans using their henchmen, the Taliban. And you pretend that Taliban are independent, and standing up for Afghan honour?

                  Do you remember when Taliban first appeared, as security guards for Naseerullah Babar's "trade convoy" to Kabul? You obviously don't remember that.

                  Why were all those Pakistani soldiers airlifted out of Kunduz? Why were they fighting there, as part of Taliban?

                  Next you will tell me that Haqqani does not work for ISI, and has no ties with them. You will tell me that he is a loyal Afghan Pashtun. His loyalty is only to ISI, which gives him privileges in return. That's why ISI will never hand over the Haqqanis.

                  Unlike your tagline, you are indeed a Slave For A Lifetime. The worst kind of slave is the one who doesn't even realize he's a slave.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by sanman View Post
                    What are you talking about? You think that Pakistani soldiers respect Afghans?

                    The Pakistanis rule over the Afghans using their henchmen, the Taliban. And you pretend that Taliban are independent, and standing up for Afghan honour?

                    Do you remember when Taliban first appeared, as security guards for Naseerullah Babar's "trade convoy" to Kabul? You obviously don't remember that.

                    Why were all those Pakistani soldiers airlifted out of Kunduz? Why were they fighting there, as part of Taliban?

                    Next you will tell me that Haqqani does not work for ISI, and has no ties with them. You will tell me that he is a loyal Afghan Pashtun. His loyalty is only to ISI, which gives him privileges in return. That's why ISI will never hand over the Haqqanis.

                    Unlike your tagline, you are indeed a Slave For A Lifetime. The worst kind of slave is the one who doesn't even realize he's a slave.

                    This is just baseless and fabricated propaganda that you are spreading even this enemy of the islamic emirate told you you are making up tales ( scimitarxonedge to hell),

                    It has been greatly explained even by people like the RAWA (Women rights organisation) that Taliban are not proxies of Pakistan and they are even supporting women rights.
                    High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Taliban were certainly created by ISI, and your claims are simply fabrication.

                      You say these things because you want Afghanistan to become Pakistan's puppet state.
                      You have no ghairat, or personal pride in your culture, and only want to merge with Pakistan.

                      Why you want to become a Pakjabi slave, only you alone can tell us.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X