Islam will dominate the World! Inshallah

[roadrunner]

After the islamic domination, everyone will be in peace.

You got that right! There won't be anyone else left, duhh.

[Espresso]

. A Muslim leader, in fact, would be an abettor of the kafirs and would lend them full support through his treachery. (The accursed Mujiburahman who chose his place in Hell among the Kuffars).

hey what the hell is this??? how their you or your bloody shah sahab abuse my leader how dare you ! where are the
mod ! this is highly ridiculus i have been saying good things about afghanistan & you people & your bloody shah sahab talk like this about my leader i had family members who were mukhti bahini my dad wanted to be mukhti bahini himself man i loved the people from afghanistan from the time we landed here in canada till now man i remember in virginia our family's favourite spot is charakol kabab the afghanistan shop here in canada we buy stuff from afghanistan shops & asks everybody to go there me,my younger brother,my father have always loved you guys we have so many friends from afghanistan be it pashto ,tajiks,hazaras,daris etc & you guys your bloody shah sahab talks like this about our leader that the same guy who supported your pashtun brothers against pakistan how ungrateful you guys are you guys have spited on 3 million bengalis shaheed who gave their life for an independent bangladesh ,you guys have spited on the respect of our mothers,sisters,daughters who were raped by that scoundrel kafir munafiq pakistani army you guys have spited on the bloods of 3 million bengalis how dare you guys
to hell with you guys

joy bangla joy bangla aar jay hind

[roadrunner]

. A Muslim leader, in fact, would be an abettor of the kafirs and would lend them full support through his treachery. (The accursed Mujiburahman who chose his place in Hell among the Kuffars).

What's wrong with that prophecy out of my curious nature.

• He was a Muslim leader was he not?
• He did abet the "kafir" in the sense he made pacts with the Indian military didnt he?
• Militant rebellion is treason too surely?

[KhalsaWarrior]

. A Muslim leader, in fact, would be an abettor of the kafirs and would lend them full support through his treachery. (The accursed Mujiburahman who chose his place in Hell among the Kuffars).

What's wrong with that prophecy out of my curious nature.

• Bonglabonobo was a Muslim leader was he not?
• Bongabongo did abet the "kafir" in the sense he made pacts with the Indian military didnt he?
• Militant rebellion is treason too surely?

Why do you make fun of BD's national icon? If you dont know how to spell Bangabandhu why make the effort? Pakistanis get too emotional when somebody disrespects their Quaid, so why do it for others?

[roadrunner]

How do you spell it? Dont you find it a complicated name?

I don't mind how you spell Quaid.

If there's one thing I cannot stand, it's hypocrisy.

So would you say the prediction was incorrect?

[KhalsaWarrior]

How do you spell it? Dont you find it a complicated name?

I don't mind how you spell Quaid.

If there's one thing I cannot stand, it's hypocrisy.

So would you say the prediction was incorrect?

BangaBandhu. And dont try to act so innocent man. You know what you were trying to do. Having a mature debate is not one of your qualities, so please accept it.

And I think your prediction is cr@p. How old are you again. How could you have predicted what was going to happen in 1971?

[roadrunner]

It's not my prediction. It was some person 900 years ago.

Which part of the prediction do you disagree with? That Bongabunadu or whatever its spelling is did not make a secret pact with India or that it wasn't treachery?

[KhalsaWarrior]

It's not my prediction. It was some person 900 years ago.

Which part of the prediction do you disagree with? That Bongabunadu or whatever its spelling is did not make a secret pact with India or that it wasn't treachery?

Treachery to whom? His own people? No. They were sick of West Pakistanis running over their lands. And when he legitimately won the elections, he wasn't allowed to form a govt. Got any prediction for that?

[roadrunner]

He was a religious man so I presume he meant treachery to Muslims (which i think would have included his own people?)

So it wasn't treachery according to you I suppose..

[roadrunner]

because he fought against QAID -E-KHANZEER,SUAR -e- AZAM'S PAKISTAN thats why got it
& its Bangabandhu you idiot

But that wasn't part of the prophecy.

So how was the prophecy wrong?

[Espresso]

How do you spell it? Dont you find it a complicated name?

I don't mind how you spell Quaid.

If there's one thing I cannot stand, it's hypocrisy.

So would you say the prediction was incorrect?

if you find it complicating then spell simple or if you do then do it correctly otherwise people will spell your leader like that too

[Espresso]

It's not my prediction. It was some person 900 years ago.

Which part of the prediction do you disagree with? That Bongabunadu or whatever its spelling is did not make a secret pact with India or that it wasn't treachery?

oh get lost man you are not worthy of any discussion

[roadrunner]

if you find it complicating then spell simple or if you do then do it correctly otherwise people will spell your leader like that too now its tit for tat & not hypocrisy now as for the predictions was this guy naimatullah a prophet no he was not was he one of the four choosen khalif's no he was not so yes i find these predictions not only incorrect but also nonsense & a waste of time

He wasn't anyone high up the ranks. But isn't that unimportant.

Let's say King Tutankamen made a prediction and it turned out to be correct. You would have to say it was correct.

Now let's say a nobody made a prediction and it turned out to be correct. Wouldn't you have to admit it was correct also?

[KhalsaWarrior]

He was a religious man so I presume he meant treachery to Muslims (which i think would have included his own people?)

So it wasn't treachery according to you I suppose..

His people were Muslims as well. So according to you if one group of Muslims subjugates the other, its treason to fight against it?

[roadrunner]

His people were Muslims as well. So according to you if one group of Muslims subjugates the other, its treason to fight against it?

Yes of course.

When you become a citizen of a country, you take an oath of allegiance.

If you're a citizen of the country, you have pledged your loyalty to that country.

If you take up arms against the country you pledge your loyalty to, it's treason. There's no other option to consider.