Ask an American, agnostic and atheist man pretty much anything

[faye]

where did i complain that science keeps changing it's conclusions? you still have not shown me us where i did that, one eyed science worshipper.

[faye]

How's that 1500 year old book you believe is literal truth working out for you?

i believe there are some truths in all the books i have read concerning religion. in fact, i believe the prophet mohammad, jesus, buddha and others are teachers for the heightening of consciousness, but i don't believe in everything in those books.
i get information from many sources including from my own meditations on the reason and meaning for existence. it is ongoing contemplation for me and my favourite subject. each day brings new revelations.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

where did i complain that science keeps changing it's conclusions? you still have not shown me us where i did that, one eyed science worshipper.

if you don't recall your own posts, then that's not my problem, you should have taken the change to look at it when it was told to you to scroll down.

[faye]

in other words, scimitar, you are a LIAR and that is why you have no evidence.

you see, my little man, i LOVE it when science changes it's conclusions. it puts a smile upon my dial, because the arrogance and false self assurance i have seen in those, like ozy, yourself and scientists, in interviews etc....... gets dented.
also because i believe a lot of what scientists believe, is faulty and limited, due to their lack of imagination and personal experience, in some fields.
as we all know, many of their creations are just plain stuff ups.

[faye]

despite being born into, and force fed religion at a young age.

so you are in reaction against being force fed religion. i thought as much.

[faye]

It's a simplistic, graphical explanation of how science works, and why it's not a bad thing that science changes -- it's because we get more, and better data.

never said it was a bad thing that science changes it's mind. as my previous comment will explain to you. that is your false assumption that i think it is bad.

[faye]

Faye is actually not Muslim; she's an Australian of European descent who went through some epiphany and went into a retreat with Aboriginal Australians, she now believes that Australian Witchdoctors knew Quantum Physics before scientists did because they said stuff like "all life is interconnected" and David Bohm remarked "all matter and energy is interconnected" ....I mean clearly those Aborigines and Bohm were discussing the same thing.

her insanity is of the new age mood ring variety.

and scimitar is supposedly a muslim, who believes that mohammad was channelled instructions from god, via gabriel.
he is also into drug induced satanic music that he classifies as esoteric....
he is also an advocate of muslims following a scientific morality and the creation by muslim countries of a neo assassin group for assassination of those who don't agree with his ideas.
he believes he is logical, reasonable and revolutionary.

[کیش]

There is no logic used when you read other peoples evidence and claim your illuminated all of the sudden. That's blind following, indoctrinated by shaky evidence.

[randolph85]

beyond all the bs arguments, this is the only thing that matters.

[کیش]

No one here was arguing. But you have RTR who instigates people like a snake and Flip flops his religious views like his name is John Kerry.

If someone uses real logic, all roads leads to the all-mighty Allah. If you read random "scientist" experiments, they'll make you believe in leprechauns by stamping evidence.

It's sick that hundreds of thousands of Prophets have been send forth to humanity, but in the 21st century, humans are still blind deaf and dumb. Smh

[DaZahroJaam.]

faye's science phobia reminds me of this woman's pickle phobia.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

There is no logic used when you read other peoples evidence and claim your illuminated all of the sudden. That's blind following, indoctrinated by shaky evidence.

"other people's" evidence .....since when did evidence belong to people?

so the way to be logical is to make **** up without being able to back it up like you do?

[RevolutionThroughReason]

No one here was arguing. But you have RTR who instigates people like a snake and Flip flops his religious views like his name is John Kerry.

If someone uses real logic, all roads leads to the all-mighty Allah. If you read random "scientist" experiments, they'll make you believe in leprechauns by stamping evidence.

It's sick that hundreds of thousands of Prophets have been send forth to humanity, but in the 21st century, humans are still blind deaf and dumb. Smh

so according to "real logic" as you state it

visions of angels and mystical spirits = "actual knolwedge" .....

gaining insight into nature's properties by investigating it experimentally = "stamping it evidence"

seems legit.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

No one here was arguing. But you have RTR who instigates people like a snake and Flip flops his religious views like his name is John Kerry.

If someone uses real logic, all roads leads to the all-mighty Allah. If you read random "scientist" experiments, they'll make you believe in leprechauns by stamping evidence.

It's sick that hundreds of thousands of Prophets have been send forth to humanity, but in the 21st century, humans are still blind deaf and dumb. Smh

How do you know all these alleged 100's of Prophet's were legit?
\
yep .."smh"

the pot smoking ghetto trash clearly has the edge here.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

beyond all the bs arguments, this is the only thing that matters.

]

how would we know what matters unless we have evidence of its truth?