Ask an American, agnostic and atheist man pretty much anything

[faye]

[QUOTE=RevolutionThroughReason;656490]You mean deliberately, sort of like how you deliberately try to use the Depleted Uranium scapegoat constantly in a deceitful attempt to discredit science or how you cosstantly present STRAWMAN versions of other peoples claims?
It seems you project yourself onto others a lot.
Defending dumb broads? I haven't defended you in months. You hallucinating again? Furthermore it's not anyone I am defending, I explaining how you distort and misrepresent what people are saying, so it is intellectual honesty I'm defending. Not her, she needs none of my defense.[/QU


ah, so you just couldn't stop your blabbermouth from blabbering.

why does it upset you that i point out defects of scientific creations? the intelligent members of the human race are well aware of the crap that has been invented by scientists that is polluting, the air, the ocean. the earth.
all the toxic crap didn't just climb out from a hole in the ground and change into dangerous pollutants on it's own.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

I see so now you know "why" and "how" I'm doing things, even though I wrote "metaphorically speaking"

If this is not an example of how you mindlessly reject evidence to desperately cling to your own delusion despite it I don't know what is.

It also gives insights as to why you think you've never been debunked by science, self delusion.

[faye]

why would a metaphor contain a demon if one does not have demons in ones head before placing it there?
i never saw a metaphor with a demon, ever, because i don't believe in them. but i do believe that others believe in them, catya.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

That's a commonly used metaphor for someone in an internal struggle with reality.Your thesis that only having demons in ones, would mean that by you writing demons that you now have demons in your head and thus nullified your previous post,

You even contradicted yourself in the same post here. You believe that a person has demons in their heads if they mention demons, but you don't believe in demons? Contradiction!

check-mate....you've become erratic.

[faye]

ohhhhh, commonly used by you common folk, eh?

[DaZahroJaam.]

did i say an ongoing process should have a conclusion?

if you are going to attempt to be clever, in betweeen your jealousy bitch sessions with other women, be a bit more astute and read peoples comments with more awareness.

you were complaining that science keeps changing it's conclusion everyday! how can it have a conclusion when new discoveries are made and have yet to be made every day?
if you disagree with a man, you want him. if you disagree with a woman, you are a jealous bitch. what of you would i be jealous of?? my comments have plenty of awareness in them. it's you who keeps blabbering on and on about nothing in particular.
seeing how nothing new can be discussed here for the next month or two since you just happened to this subject, i would like to take my leave. i get irritated when people repeat the same stuff over and over and you seem to have the habit of doing just that.

[faye]

where did i complain that science keeps changing it's conclusions? you still have not shown me us where i did that.
so stop ranting please, and heal your damaged psyche or go bitch on the younger women. know your place woman.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

we know you're senile and you forget things easily, but just scroll down.

your own words are a testimony against you

[faye]

we know you're senile and you forget things easily, but just scroll down.

your own words are a testimony against you

darling, show granny. her memory is defective, you know that, so be a good boy and show me where i complained about science changing it's conclusions.

[faye]

logic is a system of developing a conclusion based on ascertainable variables

well you sure can't do that with the invisible, and peoples personal experiences, now can you?

BTW, as a supposed muslim, do you believe that your prophet recieved information from god, via gabriel, to help heighten the consciousness of humans?

[faye]

faiath means belief without evdence; .

faith-complete trust in someone or something. (online dictionary definition.)
ozy appears to have FAITH in the beliefs he has chosen to accept.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

faith-complete trust in someone or something. (online dictionary definition.)
ozy appears to have FAITH in the beliefs he has chosen to accept.

hmmm you seem to be using a convenient but very contextually irrelevant definition

faith [feyth] Show IPA
noun
1.
confidence or trust in a person or thing: faith in another's ability.
2.
belief that is not based on proof: He had faith that the hypothesis would be substantiated by fact.

that second definition would be more descriptive of the faith you represent

[RevolutionThroughReason]

well you sure can't do that with the invisible, and peoples personal experiences, now can you?

BTW, as a supposed muslim, do you believe that your prophet recieved information from god, via gabriel, to help heighten the consciousness of humans?

exactly, which means such claims can be easily forged and are undeliable

I don't answer tangential questions.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

darling, show granny. her memory is defective, you know that, so be a good boy and show me where i complained about science changing it's conclusions.

It's already on this page my decaying haggard prune. Why should I show you something you already have done blatant;y?

you're one of those dense people

[faye]

abscence of evidence is not evidence of abscence.....
so, with logic, you need to have the proof before you can deny the existence of what you don't know exists, no?